cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota bandung,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA
Published by Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
ISSN : 14120917     EISSN : 24433616     DOI : -
Core Subject :
Journal of Mathematics and Science Teaching or Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (JPMIPA) was founded in 1993 and published qualitative and or quantitative research concerning mathematics and science teaching. JPMIPA is published by Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (FPMIPA-UPI) in association with Indonesian Society for Science Educators (JPII), twice a year in April and October with 16 articles per number or 32 articles per year.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 7 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 26, No 1 (2021): JPMIPA: Volume 26, Issue 1, 2021" : 7 Documents clear
COMPETENCE OF PRIMARY SCHOOL SCIENCE TEACHERS IN TEACHING SCIENCE SUBJECTS: THE CASE OF PRIMARY SCHOOLS IN NORTH SHEWA ZONE, AMHARA REGION - ETHIOPIA Sisay Hailu
Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA Vol 26, No 1 (2021): JPMIPA: Volume 26, Issue 1, 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18269/jpmipa.v26i1.41721

Abstract

Primary school science teachers’ competencies were analyzed in this paper. The importance of science teachers’competencies in teaching science is underlined and also the existing primary school science teachers’ competency of subject matter knowledge (SMK);methodology; laboratory utilization; planning of lesson and implementation of the plan and competency of formative continuous assessment were studied. While schools were selected using purposive sampling, the data sources were selected through random sampling techniques. Data was collected through close-ended and open-ended questionnaires, focused group discussion, classroom observation with rating scale and  semi-structured interview. The data were analyzed by statistical analysis using chi-square, one way ANOVA, f-test, and Tukey’s HSD test. The result of the research revealed that primary school science teachers in the sample schools were found less competent in all the areas. They lack fundamental competence in some areas under investigation. Based on this some recommendations were forwarded.
UNDERSTANDING MOLECULAR BONDING AND GEOMETRY THROUGH FLIPPED CLASSROOM IMPLEMENTATION Sri Mulyanti; Mutista Hafshah; Nana Misrochah
Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA Vol 26, No 1 (2021): JPMIPA: Volume 26, Issue 1, 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18269/jpmipa.v26i2.32868

Abstract

Understanding molecule bonding and geometry are essential requirements in learning organic chemistry. Studies found that students cannot fully grasp the meaning of these abstract concepts, and pandemic conditions become an added challenge for learning organic chemistry virtually. In this study, We implement flipped classroom model for teaching organic chemistry, particularly for molecule bonding and geometry. Results indicated the benefit of the flipped classroom for students' improved understanding, and advanced analysis for several learning aspects also corroborated this finding.
APPLICATION OF INQUIRY LEARNING WITH A FLIPPED CLASSROOM APPROACH TO IMPROVE STUDENTS' SCIENCE PROCESS SKILLS ON DYNAMIC FLUID MATERIALS Julia Edwina Hasbi; Didi Teguh Chandra; Winny Liliawati
Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA Vol 26, No 1 (2021): JPMIPA: Volume 26, Issue 1, 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18269/jpmipa.v26i1.45072

Abstract

This study aims to obtain an overview of improving students' science process skills by applying inquiry learning with a flipped classroom approach on dynamic fluid materials. This study applies a pre-experimental design using a pretest-posttest control group design. The research subjects were students of class XI in one of the public high schools in Kampar Regency, Riau Province with a sampling technique based on certain considerations (purposive sampling). The sample in this study was one class of XI IPA students which was reopened by 25 students with an average age of 17 years. The research data was obtained through a science process skills test in the form of multiple choice as many as 20 items that have been validated and tested. The results showed that inquiry learning with a flipped classroom approach on dynamic fluid materials can improve science process skills after learning activities with an N-gain of 0.31 are categorized as moderate.
RESEARCH SKILLS, PRODUCT MAKING SKILLS, AND STUDENTS' PROCEDURAL KNOWLEDGE ON BIOLOGICAL LEARNING USING ENGINEERING DESIGN PROCESS (EDP) Husna Dita Rahmah
Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA Vol 26, No 1 (2021): JPMIPA: Volume 26, Issue 1, 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18269/jpmipa.v26i1.48789

Abstract

Nowadays, Human resources in Indonesia need more skills to succeed in facing the competition in the 21st century. One of the skills that must have is research and product-making skills. This study aimed to analyze students' research skills, product-making skills, and procedural knowledge in learning biology, especially the concept of food processing technology using the Engineering Design Process (EDP). EDP is a learning approach through idea, design, creation, and test activities skills to develop STEM-based learning that can strengthen research and product skills. This study used a quasi-experimental method with a non-equivalent control group research design. The research sample consisted of 24 EDP and 21 students in non-EDP classes. Data was collected using a rubric to measure research and product-making skills—also multiple choice questions to measure students' procedural knowledge. The results of this study indicated that EDP learning strengthened the research skills of students in EDP classes, especially the skill of determining the topic of problems, determining tools and materials, and making product designs. On the other hand, students in non-EDP classes are better at determining the research variables and making hypotheses. Students in EDP classes outperformed all indicators of skills in making products. EDP learning strengthened students' product-making skills in selecting, packaging, and making packaging on food products. Likewise, procedural knowledge, especially on indicators determining the research variables.
DYNAMICS OF STUDENTS’ SELF-REGULATED LEARNING WITHIN A MULTI-USER VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT IN ECOLOGICAL LEARNING Khalifatulloh Fiel’ardh
Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA Vol 26, No 1 (2021): JPMIPA: Volume 26, Issue 1, 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18269/jpmipa.v26i1.48790

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the dynamics of students’ self-regulated learning within a Multi-User Virtual Environment (MUVE). Qualitative data collection and analysis were carried out within a one-group posttest-pretest design. Thirty-two students from a bilingual private school in Bandung were chosen to complete the questionnaire to measure students’ self-regulated learning and evaluate students’ conceptual understanding about ecosystem. The result showed that MUVE had an adequate impact on self-regulated learning and the conceptual understanding. The qualitative analysis provided that the most commonly used learning strategy was help-seeking. Pathway analysis showed that the self-regulated learning component significantly affects students’ conceptual understanding.
PRE-SERVICE MATHEMATICS TEACHERS’ SYMBOL SENSE BEHAVIOR: THE CASE OF EQUATIONS Al Jupri
Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA Vol 26, No 1 (2021): JPMIPA: Volume 26, Issue 1, 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18269/jpmipa.v26i1.52930

Abstract

Symbol sense refers largely to an ability to give meaning and to see important structures in symbols, expressions, formulas, and equations. This ability shows an algebraic proficiency in dealing with symbolic representations and is considered important for pre-service mathematics teachers for their future careers. This study aims to investigate pre-service mathematics teachers’ symbol sense ability when dealing with equations. To do so, we set up a qualitative case study. First, after conducting a literature study, we designed symbol sense tasks according to symbol sense characteristics on the topic of equations. Second, we administered an individual written test involving 31 pre-service mathematics teachers (18-19-year-old) at the beginning of the School Mathematics course. Third, we analyzed written work using a symbol sense perspective. The results showed that about two-thirds of the participants lacked symbol sense since they tend to use more procedural strategies than symbol sense strategies in solving equations.ABSTRAKKepekaan simbol secara umum dapat diartikan sebagai kemampuan untuk memaknai dan melihat struktur penting dalam simbol, bentuk aljabar, rumus, dan persamaan. Kemampuan ini menunjukkan kecakapan aljabar dalam menghadapi representasi simbolik dan dipandang penting sebagai bekal bagi calon guru matematika. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menginvestigasi kepekaan simbol calon guru matematika ketika menyelesaikan persamaan. Untuk mencapai tujuan ini, kami melakukan penelitian kualitatif dengan desain studi kasus dengan langkah-langkah sebagai berikut. Pertama, setelah melakukan studi literatur, kami mendesain soal-soal kepekaan simbol sesuai dengan karakteristik kepekaan simbol pada topik persamaan. Kedua, kami mengadakan tes tertulis individu yang melibatkan 31 calon guru matematika (18-19 tahun) di permulaan perkuliahan Matematika sekolah. Ketiga, berdasarkan hasil tes, kami menganalisis pekerjaan tertulis calon guru tersebut menggunakan perspektif kepekaan simbol. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa sekitar dua pertiga dari jumlah peserta yang terlibat dalam tes tertulis kurang memiliki kepekaan  simbol karena mereka cenderung menggunakan strategi prosedural daripada strategi kepekaan simbol dalam menyelesaikan persamaan.
Finding Your Place in Science: Factors Influencing Students' Decision in Choosing Science as a Subject to Study N.N. Azizah
Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA Vol 26, No 1 (2021): JPMIPA: Volume 26, Issue 1, 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18269/jpmipa.v26i1.58673

Abstract

Studies have uncovered that educators, scientists, and policymakers are concerned that students' interest in pursuing science has grown visibly smaller. Recent Indonesian Ministry of Education data even suggested that the number of students enrolled in science majors was only a fifth of students enrolled in economics majors. This paper investigated factors contributing to why students' decided to pursue science majors as subjects to study and how these factors illuminated the steps that can be taken to improve how students see science and renew their faith and interest in pursuing science for their future careers.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 7

 1 

Filter by Year

2021 2021


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 27, No 2 (2022): JPMIPA: Volume 27, Issue 2, 2022 Vol 27, No 1 (2022): JPMIPA: Volume 27, Issue 1, 2022 Vol 26, No 2 (2021): JPMIPA: Volume 26, Issue 2, 2021 Vol 26, No 1 (2021): JPMIPA: Volume 26, Issue 1, 2021 Vol 17, No 2 (2012): JPMIPA: Volume 17, Issue 2, 2012 Vol 25, No 2 (2020): JPMIPA: Volume 25, Issue 2, 2020 Vol 25, No 1 (2020): JPMIPA: Volume 25, Issue 1, 2020 Vol 25, No 2 (2020): Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA - Oktober 2020 Vol 25, No 1 (2020): Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA - April 2020 Vol 24, No 2 (2019): JPMIPA: Volume 24, Issue 2, 2019 Vol 24, No 1 (2019): JPMIPA: Volume 24, Issue 1, 2019 Vol 24, No 1 (2019): Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA - April 2019 Vol 23, No 2 (2018): JPMIPA: Volume 23, Issue 2, 2018 Vol 23, No 1 (2018): JPMIPA: Volume 23, Issue 1, 2018 Vol 23, No 2 (2018): Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA - Oktober 2018 Vol 23, No 1 (2018): Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA - April 2018 Vol 22, No 2 (2017): JPMIPA: Volume 22, Issue 2, 2017 Vol 22, No 1 (2017): JPMIPA: Volume 22, Issue 1, 2017 Vol 22, No 2 (2017): Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA - Oktober 2017 Vol 22, No 1 (2017): Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA - April 2017 Vol 21, No 2 (2016): JPMIPA: Volume 21, Issue 2, 2016 Vol 21, No 1 (2016): JPMIPA: Volume 21, Issue 1, 2016 Vol 20, No 2 (2015): JPMIPA: Volume 20, Issue 2, 2015 Vol 20, No 1 (2015): JPMIPA: Volume 20, Issue 1, 2015 Vol 19, No 2 (2014): JPMIPA: Volume 19, Issue 2, 2014 Vol 19, No 1 (2014): JPMIPA: Volume 19, Issue 1, 2014 Vol 18, No 2 (2013): JPMIPA: Volume 18, Issue 2, 2013 Vol 18, No 1 (2013): JPMIPA: Volume 18, Issue 1, 2013 Vol 17, No 1 (2012): JPMIPA: Volume 17, Issue 1, 2012 Vol 16, No 2 (2011): JPMIPA: Volume 16, Issue 2, 2011 Vol 16, No 1 (2011): JPMIPA: Volume 16, Issue 1, 2011 Vol 15, No 2 (2010): JPMIPA: Volume 15, Issue 2, 2010 Vol 15, No 1 (2010): JPMIPA: Volume 15, Issue 1, 2010 Vol 14, No 2 (2009): JPMIPA: Volume 14, Issue 2, 2009 Vol 13, No 1 (2009): JPMIPA: Volume 13, Issue 1, 2009 Vol 12, No 2 (2008): JPMIPA: Volume 12, Issue 2, 2008 Vol 11, No 1 (2008): JPMIPA: Volume 11, Issue 1, 2008 Vol 9, No 2 (2007): JPMIPA: Volume 9, Issue 2, 2007 Vol 9, No 1 (2007): JPMIPA: Volume 9, Issue 1, 2007 Vol 8, No 2 (2006): JPMIPA: Volume 8, Issue 2, 2006 Vol 8, No 1 (2006): JPMIPA: Volume 8, Issue 1, 2006 Vol 6, No 2 (2005): JPMIPA: Volume 6, Issue 2, 2005 Vol 6, No 1 (2005): JPMIPA: Volume 6, Issue 1, 2005 Vol 5, No 2 (2004): JPMIPA: Volume 5, Issue 2, 2004 Vol 5, No 1 (2004): JPMIPA: Volume 5, Issue 1, 2004 Vol 4, No 2 (2003): JPMIPA: Volume 4, Issue 2, 2003 Vol 4, No 1 (2003): JPMIPA: Volume 4, Issue 1, 2003 Vol 3, No 1 (2002): JPMIPA: Volume 3, Issue 1, 2002 Vol 2, No 2 (2001): JPMIPA: Volume 2, Issue 2, 2001 Vol 2, No 1 (2001): JPMIPA: Volume 2, Issue 1, 2001 Vol 1, No 1 (1993): JPMIPA: Volume 1, 1993 More Issue