cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
lawreviewuph@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Lippo Karawaci, Tangerang - 15811
Location
Kota tangerang,
Banten
INDONESIA
LAW REVIEW
Published by Universitas Pelita Harapan
ISSN : 14122561     EISSN : 26211939     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Law Review is published by the Faculty of Law of Universitas Pelita Harapan and serves as a venue for scientific information in the field of law resulting from scientific research or research-based scientific law writing. Law Review was established in July 2001 and is published triannually in July, November, and March. Law Review provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The aim of this journal is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers, and practitioners for publishing original research articles or review articles. The scope of the articles published in this journal deals with a broad range of topics, including Business Law, Antitrust and Competition Law, Intellectual Property Rights Law, Criminal Law, International Law, Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, Agrarian Law, Medical Law, Adat Law, and Environmental Law.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 6 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Volume XXI, No. 2 - November 2021" : 6 Documents clear
SKEMA DESENTRALISASI ASIMETRIS PASCA BERLAKUNYA UU CIPTA KERJA [The Decentralization Scheme after the Implementation of the Omnibus Law] Fradhana Putra Disantara; Azzahra Ayu Sabilla; Raraniken Ayuning Bintari
Law Review Volume XXI, No. 2 - November 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Village, Tangerang 15811 - Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lr.v0i2.3936

Abstract

The problems of implementing decentralization and principle of centralization cause emergence the concept of asymmetric decentralization. The concept of asymmetric decentralization is believed to be able to handle and overcome various conflicts between central government and local governments. However, in Indonesia the implementation of asymmetric decentralization experienced dynamics idea after the enactment of Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation law (Omnibus Law). This type of research is legal research. This study uses a statutory and conceptual approach by using primary and secondary legal materials. The two legal materials are inventoried to obtain a prescriptive legal analysis, as well as providing a holistic conceptual study of legal issues discussed. This legal research aims to analyze the dynamics of decentralization as the cause of the birth of asymmetric decentralization and analyze the implementation of asymmetric decentralization in Indonesia after enactment of Job Creation Law. The results of this study stated that the idea of asymmetric decentralization was caused by failure of implementation of the key to success of decentralization. Furthermore, the implementation of asymmetric decentralization was reduced by the introduction of the Job Creation Law, because of the presence of various provisions in the Job Creation Law which tend to be oriented towards re-centralization. Suggestions that can be done is to conduct a material test on various provisions that include a “greater” authority of the central government in the asymmetrical decentralized regional autonomy circles.Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Problematika penerapan desentralisasi dan asas sentralisasi menyebabkan munculnya konsep desentralisasi asimetris. Konsep desentralisasi asimetris dipercaya dapat menangani dan menanggulangi berbagai konflik antarpemerintah pusat dengan pemerintah daerah. Meskipun demikian, di Indonesia implementasi gagasan desentralisasi asimetris mengalami dinamika pasca berlakunya Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja (UU Ciptaker) atau Ominbus Law. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual dengan menggunakan bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Kedua bahan hukum tersebut diinventarisasi untuk mendapatkan analisis hukum yang bersifat preskriptif, serta memberikan studi konseptual holistik tentang masalah hukum yang dibahas. Penelitian hukum ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dinamika desentralisasi sebagai sebab lahirnya desentralisasi asimetris, serta menganalisis penerapan desentralisasi asimetris dalam otonomi daerah di Indonesia pasca berlakunya UU Ciptaker. Hasil penelitian menyatakan bahwa gagasan desentralisasi asimetris disebabkan kegagalan dari implementasi dari kunci keberhasilan desentralisasi. Selanjutnya, penerapan desentralisasi asimetris direduksi dengan hadirnya UU Ciptaker, oleh sebab hadirnya berbagai ketentuan dalam UU Ciptaker yang cenderung berorientasi pada resentralisasi. Saran yang dapat diberikan adalah melakukan uji materil mengenai berbagai ketentuan yang mencantumkan kewenangan pemerintah pusat secara “lebih besar” dalam pusaran otonomi daerah desentralisasi asimetris.
IMPLIKASI HUKUM PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTIUSI NOMOR 16/PUU-XVIII/2020 TERHADAP NOTARIS SEBAGAI SAKSI DALAM KASUS PIDANA [Implications of Constitutional Court Decision Number 16/PUU-XVIII/2020 towards Notaries as Witnesses in Criminal Cases] Jamin Ginting; Helfinsi Raportina
Law Review Volume XXI, No. 2 - November 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Village, Tangerang 15811 - Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lr.v0i2.4152

Abstract

There have been a few times attempt to cancel article 66 paragraph (1) UUJN 2014 after previously Article 66 paragraph (1) UUJN 2004 was canceled by the Constitutional Court through Decision No. 49/PUU-X/2012. With similar redactional but changing the authority of the MPD to MKN, the petitioner argued that Article 66 paragraph (1) UUJN 2014 also violates Article 27 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia where every citizen is equal before the law without exception, this principle is called equality before the law as well as Article 28D paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia which states that “everyone has the right to recognition, guarantee, protection, legal certainty and equal treatment before the law” as has been declared so for Article 66 paragraph (1) UUJN 2014. The existence of authentic deed and the appointment of a notary as a public official is the state’s effort to guarantee the constitutional rights of citizens of legal protection in document in the form of authentic deed. Notary as public officials have oaths and regulation to keep secret as regulated by laws while legal process often require notary as witness. Notaries as public officials are protected and under the care the Notary Honorary Council which established by laws and regulations to ensure that Notaries maintain the secrecy and dignity of their position. Notary shall always be in care and diligence corridor because criminal, civil, ethic sanction but above all, is morale.Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Pasal 66 ayat (1) UUJN 2014 telah diajukan permohonan pembatalan beberapa kali setelah sebelumnya Pasal 66 ayat (1) UUJN 2004 telah dibatalkan oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi melalui Putusan No. 49/PUU-X/2012. Dengan redaksional yang hampir sama, namun mengganti kewenangan MPD menjadi MKN, maka Pemohon berargumen bahwa Pasal 66 ayat (1) UUJN 2014 juga melanggar Pasal 27 ayat (1) UUD 1945, di mana setiap warga negara sama di muka hukum tanpa terkecuali, prinsip ini dinamakan equality before the law dan Pasal 28D ayat (1) UUD 1945, di mana dinyatakan bahwa setiap orang berhak atas pengakuan, jaminan, perlindungan, dan kepastian hukum yang adil, serta perlakuan yang sama di hadapan hukum, sebagaimana telah ditetapkan demikian untuk Pasal 66 ayat (1) UUJN 2004. Adanya akta otentik dan penunjukkan Notaris sebagai pejabat umum untuk hal tersebut merupakan upaya negara dalam menjamin hak konstitusional warga negara untuk memberikan perlindungan hukum atas dokumen berupa akta otentik. Notaris sebagai pejabat publik memiliki sumpah dan aturan untuk menjaga rahasia jabatan sebagaimana diatur oleh peraturan perundang-undangan, sementara proses hukum kerapkali membutuhkan keterangan Notaris sebagai saksi. Notaris sebagai pejabat publik dilindungi dan dibina oleh Majelis Kehormatan Notaris yang dibentuk oleh peraturan perundang-undangan untuk memastikan bahwa Notaris menjaga rahasia dan martabat jabatan. Notaris dalam menjalankan jabatannya tetap harus dalam koridor kehati-hatian dengan sanksi pidana, perdata, kode etik, dan di atas itu semua adalah moral.
URGENSI PENEGAKAN HUKUM PERDAGANGAN KURA-KURA BRAZIL DENGAN JASA EKSPEDISI MELALUI SHOPEE [Urgency for Law Enforcement of the Trade in Brazilian Tortoises using Expedited Delivery Services through Shopee] Risa Gia Anjani; Rianda Dirkareshza
Law Review Volume XXI, No. 2 - November 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Village, Tangerang 15811 - Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lr.v0i2.3832

Abstract

The development of the times that affect the sophistication of technology makes people tend to choose to use online buying and selling facilities. The Brazilian Tortoise trade can be found easily on the Shopee e-commerce site and sent with the goods delivery service facility. The lack of firmness from the freight forwarder in re-examining the contents of the package to be sent is one of the factors causing the deviation. That often irregularities committed by individuals go unnoticed, sometimes law enforcement only focuses on the trade of protected animals. This research uses empirical juridical method with statute approach and analyzed by descriptive technique. In essence, the individual has violated the Traffic and Road Transport Act and the Livestock and Animal Health Law. In practice, people smuggle live animals by telling the expedition officer that the contents of the package are souvenirs or toys. This endangers the condition of the animals because the packaging and shipping processes are not in accordance with the procedures. This deviation can be stopped if the expedition service inspects the goods on the package submitted by the consumer. In response to this phenomenon, Shopee has issued a policy against sellers who use Shopee's services regarding the provision of delivery services for the sale of traded live animals. Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Perkembangan zaman yang memengaruhi canggihnya teknologi membuat masyarakat cenderung memilih untuk menggunakan fasilitas jual beli online. Bahwa perdagangan Kura-Kura Brazil dapat ditemukan dengan mudah di laman e-commerce Shopee dan dikirimkan dengan fasilitas jasa pengiriman barang. Kurangnya ketegasan dari pihak jasa pengiriman barang dalam memeriksa kembali isi paket yang akan dikirimkan, menjadi salah satu faktor penyebab terjadinya penyimpangan tersebut. Bahwa seringkali penyimpangan yang dilakukan oknum luput dari perhatian, terkadang penegakan hukum hanya tertuju pada perdagangan satwa yang dilindungi. Penelitian dalam artikel ini menggunakan metode yuridis empiris dengan pendekatan statute approach dan dianalisis dengan teknik deskriptif. Pada hakikatnya, oknum telah melanggar Undang-Undang Lalu Lintas dan Angkutan Jalan serta Undang-Undang Peternakan dan Kesehatan Hewan. Dalam praktiknya, oknum menyelundupkan satwa hidup dengan mengatakan pada petugas ekspedisi bahwa isi paket berupa souvenir atau mainan. Hal ini membahayakan kondisi satwa karena proses pengemasan dan pengiriman yang tidak sesuai prosedur. Penyimpangan ini dapat dihentikan jika pihak jasa ekspedisi melakukan pemeriksaan barang terhadap paket yang diserahkan oleh konsumen. Dalam penyikapi fenomena ini, pihak Shopee telah menerbitkan kebijakan terhadap penjual yang menggunakan layanan Shopee mengenai ketentuan jasa pengiriman atas penjualan satwa hidup yang diperdagangkan.
PROSPEK KECERDASAN BUATAN SEBAGAI SUBJEK HUKUM PERDATA DI INDONESIA [Prospects of Artificial Intelligence As a Subject of Civil Law in Indonesia] FL. Yudhi Priyo Amboro; Khusuf Komarhana
Law Review Volume XXI, No. 2 - November 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Village, Tangerang 15811 - Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lr.v0i2.3513

Abstract

AI is a technology that refers to the simulation of human intelligence programmed into an electronic medium to think and act like a human. It is necessary to know the status and position of artificial intelligence in law, especially in the civil field. It can be thought of as an object. But, AI moves autonomously like humans. Of course, this becomes a problem of identifying its status. This study will discuss on the existence of AI and its regulations, also the prospects for AI as legal subject of civil law in Indonesia. This is juridical-normative research with comparative law, legal history, and legislation approaches. The data used is secondary data. The qualitative method is used to analyze and describe the data descriptively. From the research results, it is known that AI is now growing, however it is still having many perspectives of regulations. The way of thinking on legal entity theory could be the measure to regulate the AI. AI can be seen as legal subject, but it will be a problem when AI cannot be held accountable independently. AI can be valued as an object; thus, AI will be attached to the responsibility of its owner. AI can also be considered as legal subject that has partial legal capacity as the doctrine of in loco parentis, which means it is judged as a child. Whatever the choice, it is time for Indonesia to have a legal concept to be the basis for regulations related to AI.Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Kecerdasan buatan merupakan teknologi yang mengacu pada simulasi kecerdasan manusia yang diprogram ke dalam suatu media elektronik untuk berpikir layaknya manusia dan meniru tindakan manusia. Karenanya perlu diketahui status dan kedudukan kecerdasan buatan di dalam hukum, terutama dalam bidang perdata. Di satu sisi, ia dapat dianggap sebagai benda. Namun di sisi lain ia bergerak secara otonom layaknya manusia. Tentunya hal ini menjadi sebuah permasalahan identifikasi statusnya. Oleh sebab itu, dalam penelitian ini akan dibahas terkait eksistensi kecerdasan buatan dan pengaturannya, serta prospek kecerdasan buatan sebagai subjek hukum perdata di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian yuridis-normatif dengan pendekatan perbandingan hukum, sejarah hukum, dan perundang-undangan. Data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder. Metode kualitatif digunakan untuk menganalisa dan memaparkan data secara deskriptif. Dari hasil penelitian, diketahui bahwa kecerdasan buatan kini kian berkembang, tetapi pengaturannya masih beragam. Kecerdasan buatan bisa dipandang sebagai subjek hukum, tetapi akan menjadi permasalahan ketika kecerdasan buatan tersebut tidak dapat dimintakan pertanggungjawaban mandiri. Kecerdasan buatan dapat dinilai sebagai benda, dengan demikian kecerdasan buatan akan melekat dengan pertanggungjawaban pemiliknya sebagaimana hukum kebendaan. Kecerdasan buatan dapat juga dianggap sebagai subjek hukum yang mempunyai legal capacity parsial sebagaimana doktrin in loco parentis, yang berarti dinilai seperti anak. Apapun pilihannya, sudah waktunya Indonesia memiliki konsep hukum untuk menjadi landasan dalam pengaturan terkait kecerdasan buatan.
HARMONIZATION OF COMMERCIAL TRANSACTION LAW IN THE ASEAN REGION: THE IMPORTANCE, POSSIBILITIES AND CHALLENGES Jovanka Lingkanaya
Law Review Volume XXI, No. 2 - November 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Village, Tangerang 15811 - Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lr.v0i2.3823

Abstract

The Southeast Asian region is viewed as a united block that is ASEAN. The ASEAN roots from a diverse economic system, culture, ethnic, technical, and educational system. In the modern-day globalization, economic globalization continues to develop as well. This economic globalization pushes the importance of having an integrated commercial transaction law of the ASEAN member states. The idea of integration that stems from a rapidly growing economic globalization results in an unavoidable demand for harmonization of commercial transaction law within the ASEAN region. As a united region that is the ASEAN, having different regulations to govern matters of cross border commercial transactions inter-ASEAN would hinder the effectiveness of each country’s law itself. Yet, the importance of having a harmonized commercial transaction law within the ASEAN region is still questioned. This paper will analyze on the importance of having a harmonized commercial law among the ASEAN member states, the possibility and challenges of developing such a harmonization and if possible, how the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) is planning to develop a form of harmonization in its commercial transaction law.
KAJIAN GOOD GOVERNANCE SINGAPURA DAN INDONESIA: STUDI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI [Singapore and Indonesia's Good Governance Review: An Anticorruption Study] Andreas Sulardi; Anna Erliyana
Law Review Volume XXI, No. 2 - November 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Village, Tangerang 15811 - Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lr.v0i2.3950

Abstract

Eradication of Corruption in Indonesia in 2015-2019 in a row did not experience significant progress. In contrast to Indonesia, in 2019 Singapore actually occupied the number two position for the Asia Pacific region and number one in the ASEAN region in eradicating corruption. How to compare the eradication of corruption in the two countries? This article will explore the eradication of corruption in Singapore and Indonesia with a Good Governance approach and analysis of data reading from the two countries’ corruption eradication institutions. The results show that there are three key pillars in eradicating corruption in Singapore which consist of political will, independence, and effectiveness of corruption eradication institutions, and the application of good administrative services. The results of the next study explained that the eradication of corruption in the 2015-2019 period in Indonesia was deemed not optimal due to three things: political patronym and the power of investors that hindered the eradication of corruption, the ineffectiveness of taking action against the KPK, and the vision of Jokowi’s leadership that was too focused on the development and economic growth but did not pay attention to it. bureaucratic reform agenda. The benefits of this paper are primarily intended to assist Indonesia in optimizing the eradication of corruption by learning from Singapore. It is hoped that good and corruption-free governance can be implemented in Indonesia.Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia pada 2015-2019 secara berturut-turut tidak mengalami kemajuan yang berarti. Berbeda dengan Indonesia, pada 2019 Singapura justru menduduki posisi nomor dua untuk wilayah Asia Pasifik dan nomor satu di wilayah ASEAN dalam pemberantasan korupsi. Bagaimana membandingkan pemberantasan korupsi pada kedua negara tersebut? Artikel ini hendak mengupas pemberantasan korupsi Singapura dan Indonesia dengan pendekatan Good Governance dan analisa pembacaan data dari kedua lembaga pemberantasan korupsi negara tersebut. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat tiga pilar kunci dalam pemberantasan korupsi di Singapura yang terdiri dari political will, independesi dan efektivitas lembaga pemberantasan korupsi, dan penerapan pelayanan administrasi yang baik. Hasil penelitian berikutnya memaparkan bahwa pemberantasan korupsi pada kurun 2015-2019 di Indonesia dirasa tidak optimal karena tiga hal: patronisme politik dan kuasa pemodal yang menghambat pemberantasan korupsi, ketidakefektifan penindakan KPK, dan visi kepemimpinan Jokowi yang terlalu fokus pada pembangunan dan pertumbuhan ekonomi namun kurang memperhatikan agenda pembaharuan birokrasi. Manfaat penulisan ini terutama ditujukan untuk membantu Indonesia dalam optimalisasi pemberantasan korupsi dengan belajar dari Singapura. Harapannya kepemerintahan yang baik dan bebas korupsi dapat terselenggara di Indonesia.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 6

 1 

Filter by Year

2021 2021


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Volume XXII, No. 3 - March 2023 Volume XXIII, No. 1 - July 2023 Volume XXI, No. 3 - March 2022 Volume XXII, No. 2 - November 2022 Volume XXII, No. 1 - July 2022 Volume XX, No. 3 - March 2021 Volume XXI, No. 2 - November 2021 Volume XXI, No. 1 - July 2021 Volume XIX, No. 3 - March 2020 Volume XX, No. 2 - November 2020 Volume XX, No. 1 - July 2020 Volume XVIII, No. 3 - March 2019 Volume XIX, No. 2 - November 2019 Volume XIX, No. 1 - July 2019 Volume XVII, No. 3 - March 2018 Volume XVIII, No. 2 - November 2018 Volume XVIII, No. 1 - July 2018 Vol 11, No 2 (2011) Vol 11, No 1 (2011) Vol 6, No 2 (2006) Vol 6, No 1 (2006) Vol 5, No 3 (2006) Vol 5, No 2 (2005) Vol 5, No 1 (2005) Vol 4, No 3 (2005) Vol 4, No 2 (2004) Vol 4, No 1 (2004) Vol 3, No 3 (2004) Vol 2, No 3 (2003) Vol 2, No 2 (2002) Vol 2, No 1 (2002) Vol 1, No 3 (2002) Vol 1, No 2 (2001) Vol 1, No 1 (2001) More Issue