Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
2.589
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal E-Journal of Tourism IZUMI Ahmad Dahlan Journal of English Studies PREMISE: Journal of English Education and Applied Linguistics Journal of English Language Studies Bianglala Informatika : Jurnal Komputer dan Informatika Akademi Bina Sarana Informatika Yogyakarta JELLT (Journal of English Language and Language Teaching) LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, dan Sastra PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education) Journal of English Language and Pedagogy Pioneer: Journal of Language and Literature
Sari, Angela Bayu Pertama
Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika
Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences Other

Published : 18 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal of English Language and Pedagogy

 1 
Discrimination index, difficulty index, and distractor efficiency in MCQs English for academic purposes midterm test Sri Rejeki; Angela Bayu Pertama Sari; Sutanto Sutanto; Dwi Iswahyuni; Devita Widyaningtyas Yogyanti; Helta Anggia
Journal of English Language and Pedagogy Vol 6 No 1 (2023): Article in Press
Publisher : Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36597/jelp.v6i1.14738

Abstract

Test item analysis in language learning plays a crucial role in ensuring that the test can be an effective assessment tool in the learning process. It is a quantitative study that aimed to analyze Multiple Choice Questions of reading sections in English for Academic Purposes (EAP) subject for non-English majors to find out the Discrimination Index (DI), Difficulty Index (DIF), and Distractor Efficiency (DE). The participants of this study were first-year students majoring in the civil engineering program at Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. Researchers collected the primary data from the answer sheets of the reading section. The data analysis was conducted by using Microsoft Excel and uploaded to Anates. It quickly gave the result of all the calculations of DI, DIF, and DE. The findings revealed the DI and DIF of this test were not good because most of the results were poor DI and too easy DIF, which meant that most test items needed modifications and distractors. Most distractors used in this test were not functional and must be removed, changed, or modified.
Co-Authors Anik Andriani Catharina Brameswari Devita Widyaningtyas Yogyanti Dwi Iswahyuni Dwi Iswahyuni Eko Saputro Haya Haratikka Haya Haratikka Helta Anggia Paulus Tofan Rapiyanta Sardiarinto Sardiarinto Sri Rejeki Sutanto Sutanto