Nur, Imamul Authon
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

TRANSMISI HADIS DAN MISTERI ‘AN Nur, Imamul Authon
Al-Bukh?r? : Jurnal Ilmu Hadis Vol 1 No 2 (2018): Juli - Desember 2018 M/ 1440H
Publisher : Department of Hadis Sciences (IH), Faculty of Usuluddin, Adab, and Da'wah (FUAD), State Islamic Institute of Langsa (IAIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (702.056 KB)

Abstract

Indeed, Hadist in secundar book of hadith consist of 4 kinds they are: matan, sanad, rawi and symbol of transfer hadith. The experts of hadith paid attention against these symbols because the research of the symbols gave information about sanad condition between connected or not. After research about transfer hadith methods, from many imam?s books in ulumul hadith, the writer got that methods which used by rawi are limited eight methods. They are sam??, ar?, ijazah, mun?walah, muk?tabah, i?l?m, wa?iyah and wij?dah. The writer thought that the symbol ?an not from eight methods mentioned. It caused the difference about its result between connected or not. Some of the experts hadith thought that it is not connected. Most of the experts hadith thought it is connected with two requirements the first, the rawi must be safe of tadlish. The second, meeting of mu?an?in and mu?an?an ?anhu.
PASANG SURUT INKAR SUNNAH: Mudrika, Syarifah; Nur, Imamul Authon
Al-Bukhari : Jurnal Ilmu Hadis Vol 3 No 1 (2020): Januari - Juni 2020 M / 1441 H
Publisher : Department of Hadis Sciences (IH), Faculty of Usuluddin, Adab, and Da'wah (FUAD), State Islamic Institute of Langsa (IAIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/al-bukhari.v3i1.1474

Abstract

Although the function of Sunnah is as a second source of Islamic teachings.  however, it has been continously debated and even rejected by certain group of people known as inkarusunnah group. The ideology developed in the late of the second century Hijriyah yet it muffled by Imam Shafie until the greatly long period. Unfortunately,  during  the shift of 19th to 20th centuries, this idea has reemerged and grown up to the present. This article analyzes the development of the ideology using the content analysis method from the various literatures related to the history of InkarSunnah Ideology and movement. This research found the modern InkarSunnah concept is a continuity of the previous movement. According to this group, the rejection of Sunnah due to the fact that Qur?an has cover all matters. In fact, this group lack of understanding on it's real position and function as the second source of Islamic teaching. Whereas, later, they deny it's validity, though it was narrated by a truthful narrators including the companions.
PASANG SURUT INKAR SUNNAH: Mudrika, Syarifah; Nur, Imamul Authon
Al-Bukhari : Jurnal Ilmu Hadis Vol 3 No 1 (2020): Januari - Juni 2020 M / 1441 H
Publisher : Department of Hadis Sciences (IH), Faculty of Usuluddin, Adab, and Da'wah (FUAD), State Islamic Institute of Langsa (IAIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/al-bukhari.v3i1.1474

Abstract

Although the function of Sunnah is as a second source of Islamic teachings.  however, it has been continously debated and even rejected by certain group of people known as inkarusunnah group. The ideology developed in the late of the second century Hijriyah yet it muffled by Imam Shafie until the greatly long period. Unfortunately,  during  the shift of 19th to 20th centuries, this idea has reemerged and grown up to the present. This article analyzes the development of the ideology using the content analysis method from the various literatures related to the history of InkarSunnah Ideology and movement. This research found the modern InkarSunnah concept is a continuity of the previous movement. According to this group, the rejection of Sunnah due to the fact that Qur?an has cover all matters. In fact, this group lack of understanding on it's real position and function as the second source of Islamic teaching. Whereas, later, they deny it's validity, though it was narrated by a truthful narrators including the companions.