Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.947
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (Jupitek) Jurnal Magister Pendidikan Matematika (JUMADIKA) Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Unpatti Measurement In Educational Research Edumatica: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika
Gaspersz, Magy
Unknown Affiliation
Education Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Edumatica: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika

 1 
Penggunaan Model Problem Based Learning (PBL) untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Mainake, Patresya Nova; Laamena, Christina M.; Gaspersz, Magy
Edumatica : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol 11 No 3 (2021): Edumatica: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (Desember 2022)
Publisher : Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (789.822 KB) | DOI: 10.22437/edumatica.v11i03.12863

Abstract

The ability of students to understand the material on the Three Variable Linear Equation System (SPLTV) is still an important problem that must be solved. Teachers as educators need to use various learning models to improve student learning outcomes. This study aims to determine the increase in student learning outcomes of class X SMAN 6 Ambon who are taught using the Problem Based Learning (PBL) model on SPLTV material. The type of research used is classroom action research (CAR) which consists of 2 cycles and each cycle consists of 2 meetings. The data sources are teachers and students of class X-IPA1 SMAN 6 Ambon in the 2019/2020 academic year while the research subjects are 25 students. The research instrument used is the SPLTV learning outcome test which has been validated by experts. To collect data, researchers used test and observation techniques.  The results showed that there was an increase in student learning outcomes. In the first cycle, only 13 students completed (44%) but in the second cycle the number of students who completed increased to 19 students (76%). Based on the completeness in cycle I and cycle II, there was an increase from cycle I to cycle II by 32%.
Co-Authors Binnendyk, Intan Agustina Christina Martha Laamena Farida Agus Setiawati Gaspersz, Netty Heri Retnawati La Moma Mainake, Patresya Nova Sapulete, Lucyana Suranto Aw theresia laurens, theresia