Panji Asmara, Gregorius Yoga
Faculty Of Medicine, Soegijapranata Catholic University

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

MODEL SISTEM PERADILAN ANAK DENGAN PENDEKATAN PSIKOLEGAL Panji Asmara, Gregorius Yoga; Mangesti, Yovita Arie
Mimbar Keadilan Vol 13 No 1 (2020): Februari 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/mk.v13i1.2922

Abstract

Child protection is a constitutional right to realize human rights even though it is aimed at child offenders. The problem of saving culture (deviant culture) is still a major consideration as a cause of the emergence of bad behavior by children. Psycholegal approach found that crime committed by children is influenced by the process of imitation. Incorrect socialization in this imitation process, or exposure to violations of the law, is obtained from the family or social environment around children during prenatal, Christmas, adolesencence until adulthood. Starting from the wrong socialization process and the inability to understand the law in childhood. become one of the triggers of crime. The juvenile justice system model with a psycholegal approach requires diversion by strengthening the legal substance, namely (a) right to as soon as possible without delay by a free/impartial judiciary, (b) standardization of parents/supervisors who are monitored, (c) revitalization of roles Bapas as the oversight body diversion. (d) the elimination of stigmatization and (e) respect for children's privacy rights.Perlindungan anak merupakan hak konstitusional untuk mewujudkan hak asasi manusia meskipun itu ditujukan bagi anak pelaku kejahatan. Masalah sub-budaya menyimpan (deviant culture) masih menjadi pertimbangan utama sebagai penyebab munculnya perilaku jahat oleh anak. Pendekatan psikolegal menemukan bahwa kejahatan yang dilakukan anak dipengaruhi proses peniruan. Sosialisasi yang salah pada proses peniruan ini, atau terpaparnya tindak pelanggaran hukum, didapat dari keluarga atau lingkungan sosial di sekitar anak semasa prenatal, natal, adolesencence hingga dewasa.. Bertitik tolak dari proses sosialisasi yang salah  serta ketidakmampuan memahami hukum di masa kanak-kanak ini menjadi salah satu pemicu munculnya kejahatan. Model sistem peradilan anak dengan pendekatan psikolegal menghendaki diversi dengan penguatan substansi hukum, yaitu (a) hak untuk sesegera mungkin tanpa penundaan oleh badan pengadilan yang bebas/tidak memihak, (b) standarisasi orang tua/pengampu yang terpantau, (c) revitalisasi peran Bapas sebagai badan pengawas diversi. (d) penghapusan  stigmasi dan (e) penghargaan terhadap hak privasi anak.
Protection Relevance of the Execution of Separatic Creditors Based on Pancasila Justice Gregorius Yoga Panji Asmara
Jurnal Akta Vol 8, No 1 (2021): March 2021
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v8i1.15289

Abstract

The execution of the execution by separatist creditors without going through court adjudication as stipulated in Article 55 and Article 56 of Act No. 37 Of 2004 is contrary to Pancasila justice. The method used is the normative juridical method. Based on the data obtained, it can be seen that the implementation of bankruptcy executions as regulated in Article 55 and Article 56 of Act No. 37 of 2004 prioritizes the interests of separatist creditors, this is further complicated by the existence of a legal culture that shows that bankruptcy executions are guaranteed with mortgage without having to go through anmaning in court, the meaning of the debtor's insolvency should be a trial in court or through anmaning regarding the debtor's ability to pay off his debt, not solely based on the analysis and views of the separatist creditors. This is clearly implicitly based on Article 28D of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and automatically contradicts the value of Pancasila social justice.
Elaboration of Libertarianism takes the view of humanity in the dual profession law Gregorius Yoga Panji Asmara; Yovita Arie Mangesti
SOEPRA Vol 6, No 1: Juni 2020
Publisher : Universitas Katolik Soegijapranata Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (408.921 KB) | DOI: 10.24167/shk.v6i1.2628

Abstract

The advancement of civilization has led to the creation of a dual form of the doctor-advocate profession which is confronted with many conflicts of interest between two opposing interests between doctors who are also advocates. This paper uses a legal, conceptual, and eclectic approach to positive law in the dual profession of doctor-advocate with humanitarian paradigm libertarianism. The results of this study resulted in the construction of the dual law of the doctor-advocate profession, providing an understanding that each individual has the right to decide on goals to be achieved based on morality and sensitivity to fair and civilized human values, so that in constructing the dual law of the doctor-advocate profession it is done only to defend the weak, without having to leave the identity and independence of the profession as doctors and advocates.