Muammar
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

ILMU JARH} WA AL-TA‘DI Muhamad Basyrul Muvid; Berlian Tahta Arsyillah; Muammar
UNIVERSUM: Jurnal Keislaman dan Kebudayaan Vol. 16 No. 1 (2022): Juni 2022
Publisher : LPPM IAIN Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30762/universum.v16i1.12

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to examine in detail about the science of jarh wa al-ta'dil as a tool to assess hadith narrators in terms of weaknesses (jahr) and also advantages (ta'dil). The research method used is literature study. The study resulted that first, the urgency of the Science of al-jarh} wa al-ta'dil as a step to determine whether the narration of a narrator can be accepted or should be rejected altogether. Second, the history of the science of jahr wa al-ta'dil has grown since the time of the companions. Third, the method or method of the ulama in explaining the behavior of the narrators and the conditions of the critics (al-jarh wa ta'dil) in assessing the narrators. Fourth, the conception and editorial of Jarh wa al-Ta'dil (lafaz-lafaz and maratib alfaz al-jarh wa al-ta'dil, contradictions (khilafiyah) between al-Jarh and al-Ta'dil, how to know al-jarh wa al-ta'dil, the critic (al-jarih) who evaluates the narrators, and the books that discuss the science of al-jarh wa al-ta'dil) Tujuan artikel ini adalah untuk mengkaji secara detail tentang Ilmu jarh wa al-ta’dil sebagai alat untuk menilai perawi hadits dalam segi kelemahan (jahr) dan juga keunggulan (ta’dil). Metode penelitian yang digunakan ialah studi kepustakaan. Kajian yang dihasilkan bahwa pertama, urgensi Ilmu al-jarh} wa al-ta‘dil sebagai langkah untuk menetapkan apakah periwayatan seorang rawi itu dapat diterima atau harus ditolak sama sekali. Kedua, sejarah ilmu jahr wa al-ta’dil ini tumbuh sejak dari zaman sahabat. Ketiga, cara atau metode ulama dalam menjelaskan perilaku para perawi dan syarat-syarat kritikus (al-jarh wa ta’dil) dalam menilai rawi. Keempat, konsepsi dan redaksi Jarh wa al-Ta’dil (lafaz-lafaz dan maratib alfaz al-jarh wa al-ta’dil, pertentangan (khilafiyah) antara al-Jarh dan al-Ta’dil, cara mengetahui al-jarh wa al-ta’dil, kritikus (al-jarih) yang menilai rawi, dan kitab-kitab yang membahas ilmu al-jarh wa al-ta’dil).
ANALYSIS OF READING, WRITING, AND COUNTING (CALISTUNG) BASED ON THE LEARNING STYLE OF CLASS II STUDENTS IN MIN 6 PONOROGO: Calistung, Learning Styles, Students Rodhatul Alawiyah; Hestu Wilujeng; Muammar
El Midad: Jurnal Jurusan PGMI Vol. 15 No. 2 (2023): Volume 15 No 2 Desember 2023
Publisher : Jurusan Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20414/jurnaljurusanpgmi.v15i2.8495

Abstract

This research is about reading, writing, and counting based on the learning styles of students in class II MIN 6 Ponorogo, this research has the following objectives : 1) analyze calistung based on visual learning stylles, 2) analyze calistung based on auditory learning styles, 3) analyze calistung based on kinesthetic learning styles. This research was conducted using qualitative research methods with descriptive data. Data collection techniques using interviews, documentation, and tests, data analysis techniques use three stages, namely, data reduction, data presentation, and data verification. The coclucions in this study are : 1) students with the most dominant visual learning style with a score of 37 the indicators of calistung, he was able to apply it well and preciesely, 2) students with auditory learning styles with a score of 36, he was able to apply these indicators well, but not maximized. 3) kinesthetic category students with a score of 39, he was only able one of the calistung indicators but the orther indicators were not maximized in their application. Keywords: Calistung, Learning Styles, Students