Doddy M. Soebadi
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

COMPARISON OF PAIN INTENSITY BETWEEN LIDOCAINE GEL AND INTRAURETRAL TRAMADOL WITH LIDOCAINE GEL IN THE DJ STENT REMOVAL Wijayanto, Cahyo; Doddy M. Soebadi; Djatisoesanto, Wahjoe
Indonesian Journal of Urology Vol 28 No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Indonesian Urological Association

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32421/juri.v28i1.696

Abstract

Objective: To determine the difference in pain intensity between the administration of a combination of tramadol and intraurethral lidocaine gel with only lidocaine gel during the removal of DJ stents. Material & Methods: This study was a prospective randomized clinical trial with 22 patients that were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 was given a combination of tramadol and lidocaine gel urethral injection 3 to 5 minutes before DJ stent removal, whereas group 2 was given lidocaine gel urethral injection 3-5 minutes before the removal. The inclusion criteria in this study was all patients with a DJ stent placement with 1 to 3 months prior to release who were willing to participate. The Wong-Baker scale was used directly to determine the scale of pain during the procedure. Mann Whitney analysis was used to analyze the findings. Results: Most patients in group 1 are shown to have a pain rating of 2. There are 2 patients with a high pain rating scale of 6 and 7. In group 2, most patients claimed that the procedure was painless. The average Wong-Baker pain scale in group 1 (2.9) compared to group 2 (0.36) was significantly different. Conclusion: The combination of intraurethral tramadol and 2% lidocaine gel can significantly decrease pain during DJ stent removal more effectively than sole intraurethral 2% lidocaine gel based on the Wong-Baker pain scale.
COMPARISON OF S.T.O.N.E. SCORE AND GUY SCORE IN PREDICTING STONE FREE RATES OF PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY PROCEDURES IN THE SOETOMO GENERAL HOSPITAL I Dewa Gede Reza Sanjaya; Doddy M. Soebadi; Djojodimedjo, Tarmono; Bambang Soeprijanto
Indonesian Journal of Urology Vol 28 No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Indonesian Urological Association

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32421/juri.v28i1.703

Abstract

Objective: To determine the effectiveness of Modified Guy's Stone Score (GSS) and S.T.O.N.E score (SS) as predictors of stone free rates in patients undergoing PCNL. Material & Methods: The design of this study was a prospective observational analytic. Samples were patients with kidney stones who came to the Urology Polyclinic of Soetomo0 General Hospital Surabaya, which was planned to undergo PCNL surgery, patients who met the inclusion criteria will have a CT stonographic examination then counted for the S.T.O.N.E score and Modified Guy's Stone Score before the PCNL procedure. Postoperative stone size evaluation used KUB X-ray (BOF) to assess Stone Free Rate (SFR). Results: In the ETA statistical test there was a strong relationship between GSS and SFR with a relationship strength value of 0.609, the direction of the relationship between these two variables was positive. This means that the greater the GSS, the less likely the SFR could be achieved. The relationship between these two variables was significant with p= 0.05. While between SS and SFR with a relationship strength value of 0.55, the strength of the relationship in these two variables was positive which indicated the higher the SS, the less likely the occurrence of SFR. But both of them were not statistically significant with p= 0.228. Conclusion: Guy Stone Score (GSS) gives a better predictive value than the STONE score (SS) on the stone free rates in patients undergoing PCNL procedures.