Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Halaman Olahraga Nusantara : Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan
Samin, Giofandi
Universitas Muhammadiyah Gorontalo
Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Football Game Development Moving Wicket Ardin Abdul Gani; Arief Ibnu Haryanto; Gilang Ramadan; Giofandi Samin; Iwan Fataha; Sulasikin Sahdi Kadir
Halaman Olahraga Nusantara : Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan Vol 4, No 2 (2021): Halaman Olahraga Nusantara (Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan)
Publisher : Universitas PGRI Palembang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (353.176 KB) | DOI: 10.31851/hon.v4i2.5278

Abstract

The sport of football is a game that is very popular in all circles; it is proven that in every region that has a football field, there must be someone who plays either from achievement or to fill in his spare time. Therefore, this research aims to develop a football game that moves. This research method is development research that has been modified, starting from preliminary studies to testing products that have been designed. The result of this research is that a mobile goal football development product was created as a learning medium for junior high schools, which is adjusted to the level of development and growth of students.
Yogyakarta Team Management Evaluation Giofandi Samin; Gilang Ramadan; Arief Ibnu Haryanto; Iwan Fataha; Sulasikin Sahdi Kadir; Ardin Abdul Gani
Halaman Olahraga Nusantara : Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan Vol 4, No 2 (2021): Halaman Olahraga Nusantara (Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan)
Publisher : Universitas PGRI Palembang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (520.413 KB) | DOI: 10.31851/hon.v4i2.5279

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the 2017 PORDA activity coaching program in Yogyakarta City. This study uses program evaluation research which consists of a context evaluation approach, input, process, product. The sample in this study used purposive sampling with criteria considered to know best about what is expected, which then determined the number of 21 people. The results of this study are that: The context evaluation approach has a good category. The input evaluation approach has a good class. The process evaluation approach has a reasonable level. The product evaluation approach has a week category. Meanwhile, the overall analysis of the context, input, process, and product management evaluation is a good category.
Co-Authors Arief Ibnu Haryanto Iwan Fataha Ramadan, Gilang Sulasikin Sahdi Kadir