Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Bisnis dan Akuntansi Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis, dan Akuntansi
Warsidi Warsidi
Universitas Jenderal Soedirman
Economics, Econometrics & Finance

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
PENGARUH KESESUAIAN KOMPENSASI, KOMITMEN ORGANISASI DAN BUDAYA ORGANISASI TERHADAP KEADILAN DISTRIBUTIF DI DINAS KABUPATEN BANYUMAS NANDA PUTRI; Eliada Herwiyanti; Warsidi Warsidi
Jurnal Bisnis dan Akuntansi Vol 20 No 1 (2018): Jurnal Bisnis dan Akuntansi
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (156.481 KB) | DOI: 10.34208/jba.v20i1.411

Abstract

This research is a quantitative research that was conducted in Banyumas Regency. The purpose of this research is to determine the effect of compensation suitability, organizational commitment and organizational culture to distributive justice. Hypothesis testing in this research using the method of multiple linear regression analysis. The population in this research are all Financial Officer in Banyumas Regency. Samples were taken using purposive sampling technique and Slovin Formula to determining the sample size, thus there are 52 samples in this research. Data was collected trough questionnaires to all of the respondents. Based on the results, it shown that the compensation suitability, organizational commitment, and organizational culture have a positive coefficient on distributive justice. All three independent variables simultaneously influenced to distributive justice, whereas the most influential variable is compensation suitability. It can be conclude that the higher level of compensation suitability, organizational commitment, and organizational culture, the higher level of distributive justice.
The effect of professional skepticism, client pressure, auditor experience, and audit regulation on audit fraud (Empirical study in Headquarter Office of Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan RI) Warsidi Warsidi; Siti Maghfiroh; Larasati Nanda
Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis dan Akuntansi (JEBA) Vol 20, No 1 (2018)
Publisher : Ilmu Ekonomi Pembangunan Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Unsoed

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (987.051 KB) | DOI: 10.32424/jeba.v20i1.1149

Abstract

Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan is a state institution authorized to audit reports on the management and accountability of state finances to the Central Government, Regional Government, Bank Indonesia, State-Owned Enterprises, Public Service Bodies, and Regional-Owned Enterprises. In carrying out its duties, BPK has several authorities that are BPK examine the object of examination, plan and conduct an inspection, determine the time and method of examination, and compile and present the report of the examination result. Based on the 1945 Constitution, BPK is an independent state institution so that in carrying out its duties, BPK perform independently and freely without any parties that can interfere or influence the examination report. But in fact, there are still many phenomena in which auditors conduct audit fraud by selling buying audit opinions and bribes to change the contents of the examination report. There are several factors that lead to audit fraud, such as professional skepticism, client pressure, auditor experience, and audit regulation. This study aims to examine the effects of professional skepticism, client pressure, auditor experience, and audit regulation on audit fraud. This research is a quantitative study with primary data from questionnaires distributed to BPK with respondents AKN II, III and IV. Sampling technique uses a convenience sampling method. Data analysis technique used is multiple regression analysis. The results of this study indicate that professional skepticism and audit regulation have a significant negative effect on audit fraud, the auditor's experience has a negative insignificant effect on audit fraud, while client pressure has an insignificant positive effect on audit fraud.Keywords: professional skepticism, client pressure, auditor experience, audit regulations, audit fraud.
Co-Authors ELIADA HERWIYANTI Larasati Nanda NANDA PUTRI Siti Maghfiroh