Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.751
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal The 2nd Proceeding Indonesia Clean of Corruption in 2020" Unes Law Review
Sukmareni Sukmareni
Unknown Affiliation
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
AN INVESTIGATION AUTHORITY OF CRIMINAL ACT ON CORRUPTION IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM IN INDONESIA Sukmareni Sukmareni
The 2nd Proceeding “Indonesia Clean of Corruption in 2020" Table Of Content
Publisher : The 2nd Proceeding “Indonesia Clean of Corruption in 2020"

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Investigation of corruption, requires special provisions nonscheduled general criminal law. Investigation of corruption that were previously carried out by the police or the prosecutor's office, it turns out in practice raises legal issues at the level of implementation. Therefore, the establishment of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) is going forward in the study referred to by the Commission through Act No. 30 of 2002 as an independent agency is expected to help accelerate the eradication of corruption in Indonesia. Establishment of the Commission resulted in differences in investigation and prosecution of corruption, has been authorized to investigate the criminal acts of corruption only at the police investigators and prosecutors, now compounded one another institution which has the authority investigation in Indonesia, namely the Commission. Investigator Police authority in the investigation of corruption offenses based on Law No. 8 of 1981 on the Law of Criminal Procedure Code and Law No. 2 of 2002 on the Police, while the authority of the Attorney Investigator by the Criminal Procedure Code and the Law No.16 of 2004 on the Prosecutor and Law No. 28 of 1999 on Corruption, Collusion and Nepotism and Act 8 of 2010 on Money Laundering. KPK investigators and the authority under the Act No. 30 of 2002 on Corruption Eradication Commission . Giving investigative authority at 3 above institutions (police investigation, prosecutor investigators and the KPK investigators) turned in its implementation raises several issues, among others, 1) differences in interpretation of the respective authorities of investigating corruption, 2) the willingness of the parties to protect fellow colleagues who indicated to corruption, 3) lack of coordination among the three agencies authorized to conduct the investigation corruption itself. This could hamper the acceleration of the eradication of corruption in Indonesia. Therefore it is necessary to do further research to find a model investigation of corruption are ideal to be applied in the Indonesian criminal justice system, which is expected to be able to help accelerate the eradication of corruption itself Keywords : Authorities, Investigation of Corruption, the Criminal Justice System Indonesia
Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penggelapan dalam Hubungan Kerja (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 90/Pid.B/2021/PN Bkt) Abdul Gafur; Sukmareni Sukmareni; Syaiful Munandar
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.663

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pertimbangan hakim dalam tindak pidana penggelapan dalam jabatan dan untuk mengetahui penerpan sanksi dalam putusan Nomor 90/Pid.B/2021/PN Bkt. Penelitian ini tertuju pada penelitian kepustakaan, mempelajari, mengkaji dan menjelaskan mengenai tindak pidana penggelapan dalam jabatan. Hasil dari penulisan ini menunjukan bahwa 1) pertimbangan hukum bahwa fakta-fakta dipersidangan sekaligus kesesuaian diantara keterangan saksi-saksi akan serta hal-hal yang meringankan dan hal-hal yang memberatkan akan mempengaruhi putusan Hakim. Dalam hal ini terdakwa Eka Sari panggilan Eka memang telah terbukti bersalah sesuai dengan pasal yang didakwakan oleh Jaksa Penuntut Umum. 2) Terkait pertimbangan hukum oleh hakim terhadap pelaku tindak pidana penggelapan dalam hubungan kerja, nomor putusan 90/pid.B/2021/PN Bkt. Ini masih kurang tepat, karena sanksi pidana yang diterima terdakwa belum sebanding dengan jumlah kerugian materil yang diterima oleh cv merapi argo sejati. Dengan kerugian materil yang mencapai Rp. 87.092.000,- (delapan puluh juta Sembilan puluh dua ribu rupiah) dan kerugian non materil seperti nama baik perusahaan yang sudah dinilai menurun sehingga membuat perusahaan tersebut tutup sementara.
Pelaksanaan Penyidikan oleh Penyidik Polresta Bukittinggi dalam Menetapkan Status Tersangka Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik Melalui Media Sosial Salsa Zhafira Ayudia; Sukmareni Sukmareni; Yenny Fitri. Z
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.771

Abstract

One form of crime committed in cyberspace (cyber crime) is defamation through social media. One example of a defamation case through social media that occurred in the city of Bukittinggi was addressed to one of the candidates for mayor of Bukittinggi. This case started with a post in the form of a fake letter linking Ramlan Nurmatias with the Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle. This led to the criminal act of defamation considering that Ramlan Nurmatias was a candidate for mayor from an individual or without any supporting party. The purpose of this research is to find out how the carrying out an investigation by investigators from the Bukittinggi Police in determining the status of a suspect in a criminal act of defamation through social media. The result of this study is the implementation of the investigative process carried out by investigators from the Bukittinggi Police in establishing the status of a suspect in the crime of defamation through social media by involving several related parties in gathering evidence. Obstacles experienced by investigators in carrying out the investigative process require a long time in collecting evidence, obtaining witness statements and investigating investigators in handling cases related to the ITE Law, especially in cases of defamation through social media. Efforts made by investigators to overcome these obstacles, namely by coordinating with the National Police Criminal Investigation Unit in Jakarta in sending evidence carried out at the Jakarta forensic laboratory center, conducting special training for investigators in handling defamation cases through social media and shortening the time during the examination of the witnesses presented.
PENERAPAN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE OLEH KEJAKSAAN NEGERI PASAMAN TERADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PENYALAHGUNAAN NARKOTIKA Bunga Roswari; Sukmareni Sukmareni; Syaiful Munandar
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.772

Abstract

The application of restorative justice by the Pasaman District Prosecutor's Office to perpetrators of criminal acts of narcotics abuse is an approach in the criminal justice system that focuses on restoration, reconciliation and restoration of relationships damaged by criminal acts. The aim of this research is to examine the implementation of restorative justice by the Pasaman District Prosecutor's Office towards perpetrators of criminal acts of narcotics abuse using empirical juridical methods. The results of this research show that restorative justice for perpetrators of narcotics abuse has been implemented but is not optimal because there are still obstacles, based on Attorney General Regulation Number 18 of 2021 which can only be applied to narcotics addicts, narcotics abusers and victims of narcotics abuse, in the event that they are caught or arrested by the police, evidence of usage expires in one day and also the prosecutor must check whether the suspect is the final user (end user), check the suspect's profile in relation to financial transactions and the suspect's way of life (know your suspect), and must meet the requirements of the results The perpetrator's integrated assessment team tested positive for using narcotics. The obstacle faced by the prosecutor's office is because the prosecutor's office is not directly involved in the investigation process, so the prosecutor's office does not yet know whether the perpetrator can actually implement restorative justice or not, whether the perpetrator is really a narcotics addict, whether the evidence has been used up so The prosecutor's office must coordinate between sectors. And the effort to overcome the obstacles is by profiling or mapping, where the prosecutor's office must look at the perpetrator's legal status, user history, to his involvement in using the narcotics
Co-Authors Abdul Gafur Bunga Roswari Salsa Zhafira Ayudia Syaiful Munandar Yenny Fitri. Z