Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Konstitusi JURNAL Al-AZHAR INDONESIA SERI HUMANIORA Jurnal Konstitusi
Zuhad Aji Firmantoro
Universitas Al Azhar Indonesia
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Menimbang Kedudukan Majelis Kehormatan Mahkamah Konstitusi Setelah Terbitnya Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2020 Zuhad Aji Firmantoro
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 4 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (392.711 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1749

Abstract

This research elaborates the Constitutional Court interpretation within Decision No. 49/PUU-IX/2011 on judicial review of Law No. 8 of 2011 on amendments of Law No. 24 of 2003 on the Constitutional Court which its decision has granted mostly the petitioner’s petitions to change the Honorary Council of the Constitutional Court members composition. There are at least two examined issues in this study, they are: Firstly, does the addition of elements House of Representative, Government and the Supreme Court contradict Article 1 paragraph (3) and Article 24 paragraph (1) and (2) of the 1945 Constitution? And secondly, what is the implication of the decision to repeal Article 27A paragraph (2) letters C, D, and E for check and balance between three branches of state government (executive, legislative and judicial) in Indonesia? This research is normative legal research that uses a conceptual approach, also reviewed with case studies related to material research. The results show; Firstly, based on the study to Indonesian Constitutional Court Decision No. 49/PUU-IX/2011 which accepted most of the petitioner’s petitions on judicial review of Law No. 8 of 2011, the Constitutional Court stated that the addition of elements House of Representative, Government and the Supreme Court as members in the Honorary Council of the Constitutional Court then legislators have endangered the freedom of judicial power as regulated Article 1 paragraph (3) and Article 24 paragraph (1) and (2) the 1945 Constitution. Secondly, this decision has an impact on the members of the Honorary Council of the Constitutional Court which only consists of two elements, namely the constitutional court and the judicial commission. Therefore, the Constitutional Court Decision is considered successful in keeping the principle of check and balance between three branches of state government in the Indonesian constitutional state system.
Menimbang Kedudukan Majelis Kehormatan Mahkamah Konstitusi Setelah Terbitnya Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2020 Zuhad Aji Firmantoro
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 4 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (65.199 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1749

Abstract

This research elaborates the Constitutional Court interpretation within Decision No. 49/PUU-IX/2011 on judicial review of Law No. 8 of 2011 on amendments of Law No. 24 of 2003 on the Constitutional Court which its decision has granted mostly the petitioner’s petitions to change the Honorary Council of the Constitutional Court members composition. There are at least two examined issues in this study, they are: Firstly, does the addition of elements House of Representative, Government and the Supreme Court contradict Article 1 paragraph (3) and Article 24 paragraph (1) and (2) of the 1945 Constitution? And secondly, what is the implication of the decision to repeal Article 27A paragraph (2) letters C, D, and E for check and balance between three branches of state government (executive, legislative and judicial) in Indonesia? This research is normative legal research that uses a conceptual approach, also reviewed with case studies related to material research. The results show; Firstly, based on the study to Indonesian Constitutional Court Decision No. 49/PUU-IX/2011 which accepted most of the petitioner’s petitions on judicial review of Law No. 8 of 2011, the Constitutional Court stated that the addition of elements House of Representative, Government and the Supreme Court as members in the Honorary Council of the Constitutional Court then legislators have endangered the freedom of judicial power as regulated Article 1 paragraph (3) and Article 24 paragraph (1) and (2) the 1945 Constitution. Secondly, this decision has an impact on the members of the Honorary Council of the Constitutional Court which only consists of two elements, namely the constitutional court and the judicial commission. Therefore, the Constitutional Court Decision is considered successful in keeping the principle of check and balance between three branches of state government in the Indonesian constitutional state system.
Dampak Penyelenggaraan Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka Kepada Mahasiswa Di Fakultas Hukum Universitas Al Azhar Indonesia Zuhad Aji Firmantoro; Suartini Supendi
JURNAL Al-AZHAR INDONESIA SERI HUMANIORA Vol 8, No 1 (2023): Maret 2023
Publisher : Universitas Al Azhar Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36722/sh.v8i1.1020

Abstract

The Merdeka Learning-Independence Campus Program in Indonesian is abbreviated as MBKM. MBKM, which was initiated by the Minister of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia has been running for one year. The aim is to increase the competency of graduates so that they are better prepared to respond to the needs of the times. This research was conducted with the aim of knowing more accurately the impact of holding the MBKM program on students at the Faculty of Law, University of Al Azhar Indonesia. The research method used was descriptive statistics and Spearman’s coefficient by taking a sample of 340 students from a total population of 600 students. The sampling technique was carried out by using random sampling, i.e., taking samples from members of the entire population at random, without regard to the existing strata in the population. The results of this study show that, first, students interest in participating in the MBKM program is in line with their level of knowledge of MBKM. After conducting a survey of 340 students out of 600, it was found that 93 students were interested in joining the MBKM program. Second, the small number of students participating in MBKM (93 students) was caused by technical selection factors, which limited the MBKM quota. Third, the problems faced by blended students are not resolved, causing a small number of blended students to join MBKM Keywords – MBKM, FH UAI, Students
Co-Authors Suartini