Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
2.286
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i Jurnal Cita Hukum Al-Ahkam Jurnal Edukasi dan Penelitian Informatika (JEPIN) STAATSRECHT: Indonesian Constitutional Law Journal SAMARAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam Mizan: Journal of Islamic Law STAATSRECHT: Indonesian Constitutional Law Journal JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Legal Protection for the Partnership Agreement Parties
Kamarusdiana Kamarusdiana
Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
Religion Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 15 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Cita Hukum

 1 
Disparity In The Judge's Ruling About Community Property Disputes After Divorce (An Analysis of The Verdict In The South Jakarta Religious Court, Religious Court of Jakarta And Supreme Court) Kamarusdiana Kamarusdiana
Jurnal Cita Hukum Vol 6, No 1 (2018)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jch.v6i1.8266

Abstract

Abstract. There is a discretion in the South Jakarta Religious Court with the provisions of the Compilation of Islamic Law. Thus, the fundamental problem of legal theory and theory which is used by the Judge to decide upon the joint property, why the decision is different between the judges at the first level, the appeal and the cassation, and how the parties' argument in acquiring the common property. The result shows that the argument used by the panel of judges at the first level is in fact of the law property obtained from the income of the wife in addition to meet the sense of justice and benefit. While the judges at the higher level and Cassation in the Supreme Court are more normative to the existing of legal norms. The theoretical approach used by judges at the first level is the theoretical approach of legal realism while the judges at appeal level and Cassation use theories of legal positivism. Keywords: Joint Property, Legal Positivism, The Ijtihad Of Judges, The Disparity Of The Verdict. Abstrak. Terdapat ketidaksesuaian putusan mengenai pembagian harta bersama pada Pengadilan Agama Jakarta Selatan dengan ketentuan dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam. Sehingga, yang menjadi permasalahan mendasar hukum dan teori apa yang digunakan oleh Hakim untuk memutus harta bersama tersebut, kenapa putusan tersebut berbeda antara hakim ditingkat pertama, banding dan Kasasi, serta bagaimana argumentasi para pihak dalam memperioleh harta bersama. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian penulis, Argumentasi yang digunakan majelis hakim ditingkat pertama ialah secara fakta hukum harta yang diperoleh lebih banyak dari hasil penghasilan isteri disamping untuk memenuhi rasa keadilan dan kemaslahatan. Sedangkan hakim ditingkat II (PTA) dan Kasasi di Mahkamah Agung lebih normatif kepada norma hukum yang sudah ada. Pendekatan teori yang digunakan oleh hakim ditingkat pertama lebih kepada pendekatan teori realisme hukum sementara hakim ditingkat banding dan Kasasi lebih banyak menggunakan teori positivisme hukum.Kata Kunci: Harta Bersama, Positivisme Hukum, Ijtihad Hakim, Disparitas Putusan. DOI: 10.15408/jch.v6i1.8266
Implementation of Caning Punishment in Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam Province in a Human Rights Approach Muhammad Taufiki; Sonifah Albani; Kamarusdiana Kamarusdiana
Jurnal Cita Hukum Vol 11, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jch.v11i2.34607

Abstract

One of regional autonomy in Indonesia is the granting of special autonomy to the Provincial Government of Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam which is regulated in Law no. 44 of 1999 concerning the administration of Aceh's privileges. Islamic criminal law in Indonesia was born in the Province of Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam. Which law is different from Indonesian criminal law in general. Currently, the law is summarized in the Aceh Qanun number 6 of 2014 concerning criminal (jinayat) law. The discussion was related to the application of caning punishment in Aceh, which has undergone various changes in its implementation procedures to date. At present there is a conflict between the Aceh Qanun regarding the Jinayat law and the new regulation issued by the Governor of Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam Province regarding the application of the caning law. What was previously carried out in the open (in the courtyard of the mosque) was moved to a closed place, namely in a penitentiary in accordance with Governor Regulation 05 of 2018 concerning the Application of the Jinayat Procedural Law Article 30. The move to the implementation venue has been in the spotlight since the discourse of this rule until the issuance of this legal product, even now, when this material is raised for a more in-depth study, it still reaps extraordinary enthusiasm. 
Co-Authors Azhary Ramadhan Burhanudin Yusuf Harapandi Dahri Ita Sofia Lisa Analisa Maman Rahman Hakim Mara Sutan Rambe Muhammad Ishar Helmi, Muhammad Ishar Muhammad Taufiki Nadia Azza Naili Farohah Najla Nurul Aini Nanda Alivia Rizqy Vitalaya Nurul Adhha Ricko Anas Extrada Siti Aniza Rahmah Siti Hanna Siti Ummi Masruroh Soefyanto Soefyanto Sonifah Albani