Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
3.701
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa ELTIN Journal: Journal of English Language Teaching in Indonesia PREMISE: Journal of English Education and Applied Linguistics Tell : Teaching of English Language and Literature Journal KREDO : Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa dan Sastra Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching Language Literacy: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Language Teaching Langkawi: Journal of The Association for Arabic and English BASIS (BAHASA DAN SASTRA INGGRIS) Loquen: English Studies Journal Edulingua: Jurnal Linguistiks Terapan dan Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Journal of English Language and Pedagogy PANYONARA: Journal of English Education IJOLTL (Indonesian Journal of Language Teaching and Linguistics) LEXEME: Journal of Linguistics and Applied Linguistics CALL Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning (JETLE) Paradigm: Journal of Language and Literary Studies JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching Journal of English Language Teaching, Linguistics, and Literature Studies Leksema: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra
Rohmani Nur Indah
Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Arts Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Physics Social Sciences Other

Published : 25 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Paradigm: Journal of Language and Literary Studies

 1 
ENGLISH AND INDONESIAN TYPES OF WARRANTS IN CLAIMS OF FACT, VALUE AND POLICY Rohmani Nur Indah; Wenyk Ambarwati; Burhanudin Syaifulloh
PARADIGM: Journal of Language and Literary Studies Vol 4, No 1 (2021): Paradigm: Journal of Language and Literary Studies
Publisher : English Letter Department, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/prdg.v4i1.11082

Abstract

Warrant is a crucial element in argumentative essay which connects the claim and support in order to give proves that the supports are valid and credible. This study seeks the comparison between the warrant inn English and Indonesian argumentation. The rhetorical analysis in this study is to get deep understanding on the types of warrant that is used by the writers in the opinion section of www.theaustralian.com.au and www.seputar- indonesia.com in the claim of fact, of value, and of policy.  The finding shows that on claims of fact, English writers show authoritative and substantive warrants while Indonesian writers prefer substantive and motivational warrants. In constructing the support for claims of value, almost similar result shown by both English and Indonesian writers that is the domination of motivational warrant. The writers attempt to strengthen the claims of policy show the use of substantive and motivational warrants by English writers. Meanwhile the Indonesian writers make use of substantive and authoritative warrants to convince the readers on the need to accept the proposed policy. Further studies are expected to dig more on the critical discourse analysis of warrants across different languages within different context, types of issue presented and different form of publication.
Co-Authors Ahmad Takhfif Andini Khoirunnisa Anggi Yusuf Mustofa Arswenda Dini Mulia Aziz Mashudi Burhanudin Syaifulloh Dewi Karimah Edwin Nuvianto Al Aziz Fathor Rasyid Gaizka Naufal Winalda Galuh Nur Rohmah Indah Maria Ulfa Irwan Abdullah Istiadah Istiadah Linatul Laili Izzah Lu'luul Wafiroh Miftaqur Rochmah Ayu Saputri Mochammad Yusril Ihza Maldini Moh. Ana Usuludin Moh. Gholib Wahibullah Muassomah Muassomah Musleh Fajri Nadira Dinda Prastiwi NANDA FITRI MAR'ATHUS SHOLIKHAH Nuzulur Rohmah Rosabila Hardi Irfandina Rovita Jayaning Shoimmah Santi Istiqomah Siti Masitoh Wenyk Ambarwati Widya Nindi Hardianti Wildana Wargadinata