Zainal Azwar
Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

The Role of Substantive Understanding Approaches in The Changes of Fiqh Firdaus Firdaus; Zainal Azwar
al-'adalah Vol 17, No 1 (2020): al-'Adalah
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (247.347 KB) | DOI: 10.24042/adalah.v17i1.6031

Abstract

This study aims to offer an approach in changing fiqh to stay in line with the demands of the texts and, at the same time, to create benefits for Muslims in their lives. This research is entirely library research whose data sources are obtained from several sources, including the Tarikh Tasyri Tasyri written by Khudari Bek, Tarikh al-Mazahib al-Islamiyyah fi Tarikh of al-Mazahib al-Fiqhiyyah written by Abu Zahrah, and al-Ittihad al-Fiqhiyyah inda Ashab al-Hadis fi al-Qarni al-Tsalits al-Hijri by Abd al-Majid Mahmud Abd al-Majid, and several other sources relevant to the topic studied. The analysis technique used is content analysis, which is the only technique used in analyzing the information process. This research finds the fact that fiqh changes are a necessity to respond the social development as well as to create benefit for society. Efforts to change fiqh can be done by using a substantive understanding of the syara 'texts which are the basis and source of change. It is in these aspects does appear the importance of the role of substantive understanding in the process of legal changes, as a solution in responding to the current and future development of society.
Penolakan Permohonan Itsbat Nikah Oleh Hakim di Pengadilan Agama Kelas 1A Padang Aldianto Ilham; Zainal Azwar
Al-Qisthu: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-Ilmu Hukum Vol. 20 No. 1 (2022): Al-Qisthu: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kerinci

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32694/qst.v20i1.1741

Abstract

This article explains the application for marriage certificate which was rejected by the Religious Court. This research is focused on what are the reasons that lead to the rejection of the application and what are the efforts, both legal and non-legal, made by the applicant whose application was rejected. This study uses a normative-empirical legal research method with a judicial case study approach. Data was collected from documents and from informants through interviews. The source of the document is in the form of a request document and a judge's decision at the Class 1A Padang Religious Court; while interviews were conducted with applicants whose applications were rejected, from officials at the Office of Religious Affairs, and from officers from the Population and Civil Registry Service. This study shows that there are five reasons for rejection by the Religious Court Class 1A Padang of filing a marriage certificate application, namely because the applicant is still married to another person, the guardian who is marrying is invalid, the marriage is still under public, witnesses cannot provide information that can accepted, and the applicant was not present at the trial. The efforts made by the applicant whose application was rejected were only in the form of non-legal efforts. Of all the cases examined, none of the applicants made further legal efforts in the form of cassation due to their ignorance. They made other efforts in the form of re-marriage at the Office of Religious Affairs and determining the origin of the children.
TANAH ULAYAT DI MINANGKABAU DITINJAU DARI HUKUM ADAT DAN HUKUM ISLAM Arysmen Arysmen; Zainal Azwar; Aldianto Ilham; Aldy Darmawan
SUPREMASI: Jurnal Pemikiran, Penelitian Ilmu-ilmu Sosial, Hukum dan Pengajarannya Vol 18, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26858/supremasi.v18i1.42256

Abstract

Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui tanah ulayat perspektif hukum adat dan hukum Islam. Tulisan ini menggunakan metode kepustakaan (library research) yaitu dilakukan dengan mempelajari, menelaah dan memeriksa bahan-bahan kepustakaan yang relevan dengan pokok pembahasan. Teknik analisis data yang penulis gunakan adalah analisis konten. Hasil tulisan ini menemukan fakta bahwa hukum adat dan hukum Islam berbeda dalam melihat tanah ulayat. Konsep kepemilikan Tanah Ulayat Minangkabau dalam termasuk dalam arti sempit yaitu berupa harta kekayaan yang tergolong pusaka tinggi yang mempunyai kekuatan berlaku ke dalam maupun keluar baik dapat dimanfaatkan oleh anggota masyarakatnya ataupun diluar masyarakatnya dengan pemberian berupa adat diisi limbago dituang (suatu pemberian berupa uang oleh pihak ketiga yang mengelola dan menguasai tanah ulayat, kepada penguasa  dan atau pemilik ulayat berdasarkan kesepakatan masyarakat adanya).
Consistency of the Indonesian Ulama Council in Using Istiṣlāḥ as a Method for Legal Istinbath Zainal Azwar; Farid Afif Rinaldi
AL-ISTINBATH : Jurnal Hukum Islam Vol 9, No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29240/jhi.v9i1.7680

Abstract

This article aimed to analyze the consistency of the Indonesian Ulama Council (MUI) in using Istiṣlāḥ (public interest) as a method for legal determination when issuing fatwas. There were fatwas where the use of Istiṣlāḥ was very evident with the goal of safeguarding human lives, while in other fatwas, the opposite seemed to be the case. The objective of this study was to analyze the background of the emergence of fatwas and the consistency of MUI in using Istiṣlāḥ. This article is a normative legal study with an usul al-fiqh (principles of Islamic jurisprudence) approach. The data used represented secondary data in the form of Fatwa No. 14 of 2020 and Circular No.: Kep-1702/DP MUI/IX/2020 as the primary legal materials. Other legal materials, such as books and scholarly articles, were also used. The data obtained were analyzed descriptively using the techniques of reduction, display, and verification. The research results indicated the following: first, the emergence of both ijtihad products was caused by two conflicting government objectives; the desire to prohibit gatherings during worship and the desire to allow gatherings during regional elections. Second, these fatwas and circulars demonstrated inconsistency in the use of Istiṣlāḥ. In Fatwa No. 14 of 2020, MUI showed consistency in using Istiṣlāḥ. On the other hand, MUI appeared inconsistent in using the same method even though the primary goals of both ijtihad products were the same, preventing the spread of Covid-19 through mass gatherings.