Muhammad Syachrofi
UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Reinterpretasi Hadis Mengucap Salam kepada Non-Muslim: Aplikasi Teori Fungsi Interpretasi Jorge J.E Gracia Muhammad Syachrofi; Muhammad Alfatih Suryadilaga
JOURNAL OF QUR'AN AND HADITH STUDIES Vol 10, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Qur'an and Hadith Academic Society

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/quhas.v10i1.19080

Abstract

“Salam” is one of the opening expressions in communication. If an opening greeting to non-Muslims is prohibited, how can communication run smoothly, instead of creating harmony among religious believers? The Prophet's hadith which forbids starting “salam” to non-Muslims seems like discrimination. If it continues to be held in the current context, it will be negative patterns of interaction in religious relations and it will be potential for conflict. Therefore, we try to reinterpret the hadith by using Jorge J.E. Gracia’s theory of interpretation function. Thus, we found that this hadith arises in the condition and the situation of the relationship between Muslims and non-Muslims is not harmonious because of several factors that occur at the time. This hadith is addressed to certain non-Muslims, not generally. In the present context, “salam” can actually be a mediator in efforts to care for religious harmony, especially in Indonesia as a country with multi-religions.
Islam, HAM, dan Diskriminasi: Reinterpretasi Hadis-Hadis Kepemimpinan secara Kontekstual Muhammad Syachrofi
El-Afkar: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman dan Tafsir Hadis Vol 10, No 1 (2021): Juni
Publisher : IAIN Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/jpkth.v10i1.3998

Abstract

This paper discusses one of the humanitarian problems that still often occurs today, discrimination. Discrimination is not only contrary to human rights but also contrary to the Islamic view which is raḥmah fī al-‘ālamīn. But, in fact, Islam is always suspected as a religion that teaches various forms of discriminatory treatment. The accusation is based on Islamic religious texts which narratively teach discrimination. I find that there are two hadiths that are discriminatory about electing leaders. The first hadith is about having to elect a leader from the Quraysh clan. The second hadith is about the prohibition for women to be a leader. Textually, these hadiths are quite problematic because they contain the narration of racial-ethnic discrimination and gender discrimination. Therefore, in this article, I attempt to reinterpret these hadiths by using a contextual approach by analyzing the language and socio-historical context. My conclusion is that these hadiths were stated by the Prophet Muhammad in temporary cases. Substantially, these hadiths contain the significances that are relevant today.
Hadis Dalam Pandangan Sarjana Barat: Telaah Atas Pemikiran G.H.A. Juynboll Muhammad Syachrofi
AL-DZIKRA: JURNAL STUDI ILMU AL-QUR'AN DAN AL-HADITS Vol 15, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (826.1 KB) | DOI: 10.24042/al-dzikra.v15i1.7970

Abstract

AbstractThe study of hadith among Western scholars has developed quite significantly, especially after the appearance of Ignaz Goldziher with his work entitled Muhammedanische Studien. This development ultimately mapped the study of hadith in the West to become one-way. Western scholars have different thoughts from one another. Herbert Berg divides into three groups of Western scholars who study hadith based on their attitudes and thoughts, namely scepticism, sanguine, and middle ground. However, some experts in hadith studies only divide it into two groups, namely skeptics and non-skeptics. So, thus, there are differences of opinion regarding the position of some orientalists. For example, Juynboll was positioned by Herbert Berg in the middle ground group while other experts positioned him in the skeptical orientalist group. In order to explore this problem, the writer examines Juynboll's thoughts on the Prophet's hadith, especially in relation to the theory that is always embedded with his name, namely the common link theory. The author finds that Juynboll is not as skeptical as to his predecessors, who generalized the Prophet's hadith as questionable its authenticity. Juynboll still idealizes the existence of a hadith that can truly be accounted for its authenticity coming from the Prophet even though it is very small. That was why he was included by Herbert Berg in the middle ground group.  AbstrakKajian hadis di kalangan para sarjana Barat mengalami perkembangan yang cukup signifikan terutama setelah munculnya Ignaz Goldziher dengan karyanya berjudul Muhammedanische Studien. Perkembangan tersebut pada akhirnya memetakan kajian hadis di Barat menjadi tidak satu arah. Para sarjana Barat memiliki pemikiran yang berbeda antara satu dengan lainnya. Herbert Berg membagi kepada tiga kelompok sarjana Barat yang mengkaji hadis berdasarkan sikap dan pemikirannya yaitu scepticism, sanguine, dan middle ground. Akan tetapi, sementara pakar kajian hadis hanya membagi kepada dua kelompok yaitu skeptis dan non-skeptis. Sehingga, dengan demikian, terdapat perbedaan pendapat mengenai posisi sebagian orientalis. Misalnya, Juynboll diposisikan oleh Herbert Berg dalam kelompok middle ground sementara pakar lain memosisikannya pada kelompok orientalis skeptis. Untuk mendalami permasalahan tersebut penulis menelaah kembali pemikiran Juynboll terhadap hadis Nabi terutama terkait dengan teori yang selalu disematkan dengan namanya yaitu teori common link. Penulis menemukan bahwa Juynboll tidak se-skeptis pendahulunya yang menggeneralisasi hadis Nabi sebagai sesuatu yang diragukan autentisitasnya. Juynboll masih mengidealkan adanya hadis yang benar-benar dapat dipertanggungjawabkan keotentikannya berasal dari Nabi meskipun itu sedikit sekali. Itulah mengapa dia dimasukkan oleh Herbert Berg ke dalam kelompok middle ground. Kata Kunci:Common link, hadis, Juynboll.
Otentisitas al-Qur’an: Bantahan Pandangan Abraham Geiger terhadap Al-Qur’an Lola Pertiwi; Taufik Rahman; Muhammad Syachrofi
Jurnal Riset Agama Vol 3, No 2 (2023): Agustus
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/jra.v3i2.20576

Abstract

Abraham Geiger stated that the Qur'an took a lot from the teachings of the Jewish religion, both cultural and transcendent. This study aims to discuss and refute the views of an orientalist named Abraham Geiger on the authenticity of the Qur'an. This study uses a qualitative method with a literature study approach. The results and discussion of this study indicate that Abraham Geiger's accusation that the Koran is only a reflection of Muhammad on Judaism and Christianity is a false accusation. The accusations made by Abraham Geiger do not eliminate the authenticity of the Qur'an as the holy book of Muslims, because historical facts prove that the entire contents of the Qur'an were narrated by many people who continued the chain to the Messenger of Allah. If the criteria for news of mutawatir are mentioned, then the Qur'an has met that criterion.