Ilham Yuli Isdiyanto
Faculty Of Law, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

Problematika Teori Hukum, Konstruksi Hukum, dan Kesadaran Sosial Isdiyanto, Ilham Yuli
Jurnal Hukum Novelty Vol 9, No 1 (2018)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Ahmad Dahlan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (999.422 KB) | DOI: 10.26555/novelty.v9i1.a8035

Abstract

This theoretical-normative study aims to determine the problematic use of legal theory and its impact on the construction of the law itself. This is very important because the construction of todays law has not created a social awareness of the law so that law enforcement becomes difficult. The discussion in this study raises several issues to be studied, such as; what is the dependencies pattern between law and social awareness? Then how to reconstruct them in the current of the Theory of Law? And the last is; what is the proper direction of legal creation? The results of this study conclude: First, the problem of alienation and distortion between law and society is just like an iceberg phenomenon because the main problem lies within the understanding theoritical of the law itself. Second, the relationship between law and social awareness is the dependence relationship, where the legal product must reflect social awareness so that the actualization of the law is accepted by society as its need. Third, discussing the correlation between law and society is not enough with normative thought (prescriptive), but also empirical (descriptive), so the theory of law plays a very important role to bring this multidisciplinary understanding back to normative thought that prescriptive. Fourth, the legal product which is not based on normative thought is very dangerous because it will be very liberal and far from social morality based on social values, thus there will be alienation and distortion between law and society, or in other words law does not reflect the social awareness.
Village Sovereignty in Dispute Resolution after Law No 6 of 2014 concerning Village Isdiyanto, Ilham Yuli
Jurnal Media Hukum Vol 26, No 2, December 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jmh.20190136

Abstract

The research was conducted in order to strengthen the position of the village as a form of social control institution in solving problems that is present in the village setting which began to disappear since the independence era. A descriptive-qualitative approach with a historical-normative method is used to find the concept of the village sovereignty, obtained from studies of primary and secondary legal data. The research aims to get a historical picture as a conceptual reflection and judicial basis for developing and legitimizing the village as the place for resolving disputes among the populace. Since the monarchy until the colonial era, the village was given the authority to solve the problems of its people independently, this authority is severed after entering the independence era. The government finally began to realize the importance of village as autonomous and independent through Law No. 6 of 2014 concerning Villages and strengthened by Supreme Court Regulation; PERMA No. 1 of 2016 concerning the Mediation Process in the Court. Through the Regulation, the village head now has the authority to resolve the problems among its populace and create agreements regarding it. Hence, support from the government is needed to the respective village heads and the chosen delegates through regulation and mediation training
Village Sovereignty in Dispute Resolution after Law No 6 of 2014 concerning Village Isdiyanto, Ilham Yuli
Jurnal Media Hukum Vol 26, No 2, December 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jmh.20190136

Abstract

The research was conducted in order to strengthen the position of the village as a form of social control institution in solving problems that is present in the village setting which began to disappear since the independence era. A descriptive-qualitative approach with a historical-normative method is used to find the concept of the village sovereignty, obtained from studies of primary and secondary legal data. The research aims to get a historical picture as a conceptual reflection and judicial basis for developing and legitimizing the village as the place for resolving disputes among the populace. Since the monarchy until the colonial era, the village was given the authority to solve the problems of its people independently, this authority is severed after entering the independence era. The government finally began to realize the importance of village as autonomous and independent through Law No. 6 of 2014 concerning Villages and strengthened by Supreme Court Regulation; PERMA No. 1 of 2016 concerning the Mediation Process in the Court. Through the Regulation, the village head now has the authority to resolve the problems among its populace and create agreements regarding it. Hence, support from the government is needed to the respective village heads and the chosen delegates through regulation and mediation training
Urgensi Lembaga Mediasi Desa sebagai Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa: Kasus Desa Wukirsari di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Ilham Yuli Isdiyanto; Anom Wahyu Asmorojati
Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan Vol. 9 No. 2 (2021): Sodality
Publisher : Departement of Communication and Community Development Sciences, Faculty of Human Ecology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22500/9202134212

Abstract

This research discusses an important issue in the rural administration, that is the urgency of institution transformation of the status and position of the Village Head in dispute resolution among villagers. The purpose of this research is to highlight the urgency of institutionalization of dispute resolution through the Village Mediation Institution. The first concern is to find the status and legal basis of the Institution; the second is to describe the urgency of establishing this institution as a dispute resolution mechanism among villagers; and the third is to build the model or system that matches with the condition in Wukirsari. The research method used was a normative-empirical-concept and the data were analyzed qualitatively to be presented as a descriptive-prescriptive analysis. The result of this research shows that there is an urgency for Wukirsari Village government to form a Village Mediation Institution due to socio-geographic considerations and also as an implementation of Article 26 paragraph (4) letter K of Village Law No. 6 of 2014. The Village Mediation Institution in Wukirsari Village should consist of a balance composition between the elements of Village Government and professionals so that it will become an effective and efficient institution in resolving disputes among the members of Wukirsari Village society.
Perlindungan Hukum atas Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional dan Eksistensi Masyarakat Hukum Adat Kampung Pitu Ilham Yuli Isdiyanto; Deslaely Putranti
Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum Vol 15, No 2 (2021): JULY EDITION
Publisher : Law and Human Rights Research and Development Agency

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/kebijakan.2021.V15.231-256

Abstract

Masyarakat Kampung Pitu masih memegang tradisi dan budaya asal usulnya hingga sekarang, bahkan jumlah Kepala Keluarga yang tidak boleh lebih dari 7 (tujuh) juga masih bertahan hingga sekarang. Sebagai masyarakat tradisional yang khas, masyarakat Kampung Pitu memiliki berbagai macam bentuk Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional (EBT) yang disisi lain hal ini perlu mendapatkan perhatian serius oleh pemerintah. Regulasi di Indonesia mengatur perlindungan EBT melalui UU No. 28/2014 tentang Hak Cipta, sehingga dapat menjadi perlindungan EBT masyarakat Kampung Pitu agar tetap lestari. Penelitian ini menjadi sangat penting karena tidak banyak masyarakat tradisional yang mempertahankan hak asal-usulnya di wilayah Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis-normatif dan pengumpulan data baik primer maupun sekunder yang diperoleh secara daring serta analisa deskriptif-kualitatif. Hasilnya, masyarakat Kampung Pitu dapat dikategorikan sebagai Masyarakat Hukum Adat yang memiliki hak identitas dan tradisional atas asal-usulnya sehingga harus dilindungi dalam pelestariannya. Walaupun tidak ada regulasi ataupun penetapan dari tingkat Pusat sampai Daerah terkait Kampung Pitu, namun Kampung Pitu sudah ditetapkan sebagai Warisan Budaya Takbenda sehingga menjadi dasar perlindungan.
Tracing the roots of Muhammadiyah thought on the concepts of Dār Al-‘Ahdi Wa Al-Syahādah Ilham Yuli Isdiyanto; Fauzan Muhammadi; Umair Fahmiddin
Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 30 No. 1 (2022): March
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/ljih.v30i1.20661

Abstract

This paper aimed to discuss the concept of Dār Al-’Ahd Wa Al-Syahādah initiated by Muhammadiyah, which requires strong historical-normative legitimacy, so it does not necessarily lose its genealogy to be applied to the legal and constitutional system in Indonesia. The big question is how is the relationship between historical aspects and the concept of Dār Al-’Ahd Wa Al-Syahādah so that it has strong foundations to be implemented later in the state and nation. This normative-conceptual research is a historical reflective study that focuses on literacy aspects as the basis to build normative and conceptual constructions. The result reveals that the idea of ​​Dār Al-’Ahd Wa Al-Syahādah in the constellation of Pancasila is a strategy to realize Baldatun Thayyibatun wa Rabbun Ghafur state with the principle of Amar Ma’ruf Nahi Munkar. The concept of Dār Al-’Ahd Wa Al-Syahādah has a reference in Al Maun Theology which from the beginning became the basis of the movement pioneered by KH Ahmad Dahlan. Therefore, this strategy must be directed to a more concrete form and a more concrete movement to realize Baldatun Thayyibatun wa Rabbun Ghafur state.
MENYOAL AKREDITASI PENDIDIKAN MEDIATOR OLEH MAHKAMAH AGUNG Muhammad Radhi Abdullah; Puthut Syahfarudin; Ilham Yuli Isdiyanto
Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol 9 No 4 (2021)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (300.402 KB) | DOI: 10.24843/KS.2021.v09.i04.p07

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini yakni memberikan masukan kepada penegak keadilan khususnya Mahkamah Agung agar bisa mencetak mediator yang alami dan dapat menekan jumlah perkara dalam lingkup peradilan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penulisan ini adalah metode penelitian kualitatif. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah normatif, yaitu penelitian hukum yang mempunyai objek atas sasaran peraturan perundang – undangan dan bahan hukum lainnya. Hasil dari penelitian ini bahwa yang seharusnya menjadi solusi pada Lingkup Mahkamah Agung tentang diwajibkannya suatu proses mediasi untuk menekan jumlah perkara justru hal tersebut menjadi suatu kendala. Kewajiban yang telah ditetapkan oleh Mahkamah Agung yang mengharuskan mediator memiliki sertifikat menjadi salah satu kendala kekurangan mediator pada tingkat pertama (Pengadilan Negeri). Kekurangan tersebut justru menjadi kendala, mengingat perkara tiap tahun bertambah dan bertambah. Selanjutnya bahwa mediator yang diakui hanya yang telah mengikuti pelatihan sertifikasi mediator. Hal ini telah menyimpulkan bahwa kepada setiap manusia yang menjadi suatu pilar penting dalam masyarakat tidak diakui secara sah oleh Mahkamah Agung sebagai mediator yang dapat memimpin jalannya musyawarah (mediasi) yang sejatinya dapat menekan jumlah konflik pada tingkat dilingkup masyarakat. The purpose of this research is to provide input to justice enforcers, especially the Supreme Court, so that they can produce natural mediators and can reduce the number of cases within the scope of justice. The research method used in this writing is a qualitative research method. The type of research used in this research is normative, namely legal research which has the object of the objectives of statutory regulations and other legal materials. The result of this research is that what should be the solution in the scope of the Supreme Court regarding the necessity of a mediation process to reduce the number of cases is actually an obstacle. The obligation that has been determined by the Supreme Court that requires mediators to have a certificate is one of the obstacles to the shortage of mediators at the first level (District Court). This deficiency is actually an obstacle, considering the number of cases each year increases and increases. Furthermore, the only recognized mediators who have attended the mediator certification training. This has concluded that every human being who is an important pillar in society is not legally recognized by the Supreme Court as a mediator who can lead the course of deliberation (mediation) which can actually reduce the number of conflicts at the community level.
Problematika Teori Hukum, Konstruksi Hukum, dan Kesadaran Sosial Ilham Yuli Isdiyanto
Jurnal Hukum Novelty Vol 9, No 1 (2018)
Publisher : Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (999.422 KB) | DOI: 10.26555/novelty.v9i1.a8035

Abstract

This theoretical-normative study aims to determine the problematic use of legal theory and its impact on the construction of the law itself. This is very important because the construction of today's law has not created a social awareness of the law so that law enforcement becomes difficult. The discussion in this study raises several issues to be studied, such as; what is the dependencies pattern between law and social awareness? Then how to reconstruct them in the current of the Theory of Law? And the last is; what is the proper direction of legal creation? The results of this study conclude: First, the problem of alienation and distortion between law and society is just like an iceberg phenomenon because the main problem lies within the understanding theoritical of the law itself. Second, the relationship between law and social awareness is the dependence relationship, where the legal product must reflect social awareness so that the actualization of the law is accepted by society as its need. Third, discussing the correlation between law and society is not enough with normative thought (prescriptive), but also empirical (descriptive), so the theory of law plays a very important role to bring this multidisciplinary understanding back to normative thought that prescriptive. Fourth, the legal product which is not based on normative thought is very dangerous because it will be very liberal and far from social morality based on social values, thus there will be alienation and distortion between law and society, or in other words law does not reflect the social awareness.
Dediametralisasi Living Law Dan Kepastian Hukum Dalam Pasal 2 RKUHP Ahmad Rif'an; Ilham Yuli Isdiyanto
Ahmad Dahlan Legal Perspective Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (329.315 KB) | DOI: 10.12928/adlp.v1i1.3555

Abstract

Living law dan kepastian hukum sering diposisikan sebagai sesuatu yang diametral atau berlawan, dimana living law dianggap tidak memberikan kepastian hukum karena sifatnya tidak tertulis. Namun, menjadi pertanyaan besar jika kemudian konsep living law diakomodir dalam hukum tertulis sebagaimana yang muncul dalam Pasal 2 RKUHP sehingga apakah konsep living law yang tidak tertulis namun diakomodir dalam sistem hukum tertulis dapat berkorelasi dengan prinsip kepastian hukum sebagaimana salah satu ciri hukum tertulis. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis kedudukan Pasal 2 RKHUP dalam menjamin eksistensi living law sekaligus pelaksanaan prinsip kepastian hukum. Untuk dapat mengetahui hal ini, penelitian normatif  ini menggunakan pendekatan historis-normatif-konseptual dengan teknik analisa deskriptif dan kualitatif, terakhir adalah membuat kesimpulan secara preskriptif. Pokok permasalahan yang diangkat dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimana analisa Pasal 2 RKHUP dalam perspektif living law dan kepastian hukum serta bagaimana korelasi kedua perspektif ini dalam implementasinya? Hasilnya, living law sebagai memiliki legitimasi historis dan budaya tidak bisa dinegasikan, sedangkan kepastian harus dimaknai bahwa hukum itu benar-benar ditegakkan, terlepas dari hukum yang tertulis atau tidak tertulis. Pasal 2 RKUHP adalah upaya untuk mengakomodir living law dalam bingkai kepastikan penegakan hukumnya, dan dalam hal ini tidak ada pertentangan berarti antara living law dan kepastian hukum. 
PROVIDING JUDGES DECISIONS BASED ON JUSTICE THAT LIVE IN SOCIETY (STUDY OF LIVING LAW IN SOCIETY) Ilham Yuli Isdiyanto; Wita Setyaningrum
Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum Vol 9 No 1 (2023): Februari, Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Singaraja

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jkh.v9i1.56094

Abstract

Juridically, judges have the capacity to decide based on living law therefore justice can be fulfilled in society (Article 5 paragraph (1) of Law No. 48/2009), but the legal-formal perspective often places law enforcers as technocrats who are only able to apply an sich regulation so it will broke the side of justice. The basic question is, why do judges who decide legal cases must be based on living law and living justice in society? This research is normative-conceptual with a critical theory paradigm which focuses on legal materials (secondary data) and analyzed qualitatively-prescriptively. As a result, judges in deciding cases must be oriented towards living justice in the society, this is because in the law enforcement process the use of living law can't be ignored. Judges have a key role in how to realize this justice, therefore in deciding a case the judge must really pay attention not only to the formal side, but also to the material side thus it is in line with the objectives and philosophical basis of law in Indonesia.