Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Rizki Mustika Suhartono

Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton

Author-ID : 2565148

Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document

Claim Missing Document

Articles

Implementation of State Administrative Court Decisions: Conception, and Barriers Imron Rizki A; Rizki Mustika Suhartono; Safrin Salam
Musamus Law Review Vol 3 No 2 (2021): MuLaRev
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Musamus University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35724/mularev.v3i2.3449

This research aims to analyze how the effectiveness of the implementation of the ruling of the Administrative Court of the State and what are the factors that influence the effectiveness of the Court ruling The country. The research was carried out on the courts of The State of Makassar, data collection techniques are carried out by means of interviews and read scientific books, magazines, newspapers and other readings related to research. Results of the study showed that the effectiveness of the implementation of the ruling of the Court of The Country has not been effective, because so far there are still many Administrative Bodies and Officials of countries that are unwilling to comply with the ruling of the Court of The country, then plus the lack of participation of the parties to the dispute has led to a court could not ascertain whether a State Administrative Court ruling that has a magnitude of law has been implemented or not. As for the factors that influence the Court ruling The Country, among which is the absence of a special eksekutorial institution or institution of sanctions in carrying out the Court ruling The country, The official low awareness Countries in obeying the Court ruling The Country, the absence of more detailed provisions governing sanctions if the verdict is not implemented. Advice from the research is that, should the Government contains provisions governing the institutions eksekutorial institutions or special sanctions ruling of The judiciary of the State, so the State Administrative Court's verdict can be run and judicial administration can emerge again in the eyes of the community.

CONSTRUCTION OF THE CONCEPT OF BUILDING POPULIST ECONOMIC LAW Safrin Salam; Rizki Mustika Suhartono; Imron Rizki A; Mustakim La Dee
Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2021): September 2021
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

The 1945 Constitution does contain the idea of political democracy and at the same time economic democracy. That is, in the highest power holder in our country is the people, both in the political and economic fields. All political and economic resources are controlled by sovereign people. However, in a democratic system built certainly not all of them are directly controlled by the people. The purpose of this research is to formulate the concept of populist economic law based on economic law in Indonesia and to understand the legal comparison between Islamic economic system and conventional economic system in the development of economic law in Indonesia. This research is normative legal research that is conducted by researching and studying the laws and regulations. The research approach used in this study is 2 (two) namely statute approach and conceptual approach. The results showed that the Concept of Economic Law Based on Populist Economy in Indonesia was built through 4 (four) principles of economic law, namely legal justice, legal certainty of benefits and affordable rules so as to realize the main goal of economic law, namely creating economic growth, balanced equality and welfare while the Comparison of Law Between Islamic economic system and conventional economic system in economic law development in Indonesia is Islamic economy based on sharia principles while conventional economy based on human will.

Implementation of State Administrative Court Decisions: Conception, and Barriers Imron Rizki A; Rizki Mustika Suhartono; Safrin Salam
Musamus Law Review Vol 3 No 2 (2021): MuLaRev
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Musamus University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35724/mularev.v3i2.3449

This research aims to analyze how the effectiveness of the implementation of the ruling of the Administrative Court of the State and what are the factors that influence the effectiveness of the Court ruling The country. The research was carried out on the courts of The State of Makassar, data collection techniques are carried out by means of interviews and read scientific books, magazines, newspapers and other readings related to research. Results of the study showed that the effectiveness of the implementation of the ruling of the Court of The Country has not been effective, because so far there are still many Administrative Bodies and Officials of countries that are unwilling to comply with the ruling of the Court of The country, then plus the lack of participation of the parties to the dispute has led to a court could not ascertain whether a State Administrative Court ruling that has a magnitude of law has been implemented or not. As for the factors that influence the Court ruling The Country, among which is the absence of a special eksekutorial institution or institution of sanctions in carrying out the Court ruling The country, The official low awareness Countries in obeying the Court ruling The Country, the absence of more detailed provisions governing sanctions if the verdict is not implemented. Advice from the research is that, should the Government contains provisions governing the institutions eksekutorial institutions or special sanctions ruling of The judiciary of the State, so the State Administrative Court's verdict can be run and judicial administration can emerge again in the eyes of the community.

Title

Found 3 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 3 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 3 Documents
Search