Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Darma Agung

TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA ABORTUS PROVOCATUS MENURUT UU NOMOR 36 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG KESEHATAN Sonya Airini Batubara; Cindy Cindy; Widodo Saputra Hutagalung; Johannes Sahat Pangihutan Siahaan
Jurnal Darma Agung Vol 28 No 3 (2020): DESEMBER 2020
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Universitas Darma Agung (LPPM_UDA)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46930/ojsuda.v28i3.804

Abstract

The term Abortion Provocatus is one type of abortion whose method is most often used to end an unwanted pregnancy, even though it is the most dangerous and high-risk method. The research method uses empirical juridical. Research is analytical descriptive. Sources of legal materials used in research are primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The technique of collecting data is literature study. The type of analysis used in this journal is qualitative analysis. The results of this study are that abortion is considered a crime by most Indonesian citizens because it is considered to violate human rights. Factors that occur to carry out abortions include economic factors, social factors, Hereditary disease factors, psychological factors and age factors. The regulation of abortion is contained in the Code of Criminal, Law No. 36 of 2009 concerning Health and Government Regulation Number 61 of 2014 concerning Reproductive Health confirms that prohibiting acts of abortion and sanctions is prohibited. Legal efforts in overcoming provocatus abortion have been pursued by formulating sanctions for perpetrators in the Criminal Code and applicable Health Laws.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA KORUPSI TERHADAP DANA HIBAH APBD TERKAIT PENYELENGGARAAN SOSIALISASI PEMILIHAN UMUM DI KPU KABUPATEN PAKPAK BHARAT Bahagia Halawa; Davin Suryamana Barus; Tomi Mangaratua Butar-Butar; Sonya Airini Batubara
Jurnal Darma Agung Vol 27 No 1 (2019): APRIL 2019
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Universitas Darma Agung (LPPM_UDA)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (668.154 KB) | DOI: 10.46930/ojsuda.v27i1.139

Abstract

Corruption is a deviant behavior from normal duties of the government agencies’ role because of personal interest (family, group, friends or colleague) to fulfill status and prestige, or breaking the rules by doing or looking for influence for the sake of personal gain.This research used normative juridical method or used invitation law approach. In other words, it can be said as an approach to a problem researched focused and as a theme of a research toward the responsibility of criminal corruption of Regional Expenditure Budget grant in organizing election socialization in General Election Commissions (KPU) of Pakpak Barat Regency and to know the legal consideration by the judge in giving the decision of corruption in Regional Expenditure Budget grant in Pakpak Barat Regency. The finding of this research is how law arranged toward criminal corruption, that is arranged in constitution No. 31 of 1999 as changed by Constitution No. 31 of 2001 about The Eradiction of Criminal Acts of Corruption, Regional Expenditure Budget grant in election socialization regulated by the Minister of Home Affairs Regulation No. 14 of 2016 about the guidelines for grants and social assistance sourcing of Regional Expenditure Budget. The responsibility of corruption of Regional Expenditure Budget grant in organizing election socialization of General Election Commissions in Pakpak Barat Regency is already accordance with a sense of justice, received by both defendants, in which except of them some of General Election Commissions’ commissioners were made as defendants also but from sentence side it is not appropriate with purpose of eradicting corruption in Indonesia. The judge’s consideration ingiving a corruption decision in the implementation of election socialization at the District Election Commission of Pakpak Bharat was appropriate where the actions of the two perpetrators were illegal acts that participated in the misuse of state finances.