Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Islamadina : Jurnal Pemikiran Islam Journal of Islamic and Occidental Studies (JIOS)
Ahmad Rizqi Fadlilah
Universitas Darussalam Gontor
Religion Humanities Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Konsep Hasrat Perspektif Deleuze dan Al-Ghazali (Analisis Perbandingan Makna Hasrat dalam Psikologi) Jarman Arroisi; Ahmad Rizqi Fadlilah
Islamadina : Jurnal Pemikiran Islam ISLAMADINA, Volume 23, No. 1, Maret 2022
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto (UMP)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30595/islamadina.v23i1.8954

Abstract

Desire is becoming an increasingly intense discussion in this era. Not only that, desire is even considered to be the main paradigm of social life. Gilles Deleuze is one of those Western thinkers who focused on the problem of desire. In Islam, there is al-Ghazali who is also no less focused on desire. With a descriptive-comparative method and a philosophical approach, this paper intends to examine the conceptual comparison between the two figures.The results of the analysis show that there are similarities in thought between Deleuze and al-Ghazali, those are (i) Both agree that desire is mechanical and moving, (ii) both agree that desire has an important role in human life, (iii) they both share the view that desire is an entity that must exist in humans. The differences are (i) first, in terms of paradigm. Deleuze describes desire in a completely immanent and materialist paradigm. As for al-Ghazali, he explained desire with a divine (revelation) -philosophical paradigm. Second, Deleuze views desire as something completely positive and creative. As for al-Ghazali, although desire has a positive role, it still needs to be controlled. Because in essence, the nature of desire is bad. Third, Therefore, for Deleuze, desire needs to be freed from various constraints such as social norms, customs, or religion. Meanwhile, according to al-Ghazali, desire needs to be controlled through the mujahada. Fourth, for Deleuze, his idea of desire is not in line with moral values, but it is still ethical. Meanwhile, according to al-Ghazali, human desire should be controlled so that he becomes a moral individual.
Tinjauan Kritis Kerangka Kerja Pengkajian Filsafat Islam Pada Buku ‘History of Philosophy in Islam’ Karya T.J. De Boer: A Critical Review of the Study of Islamic Philosophy Framework's: An Analysis of the book History of Philosophy in Islam by Tjitze Jacobs de Boer Ahmad Rizqi Fadlilah
Journal of Islamic and Occidental Studies Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Journal of Islamic and Occidental Studies
Publisher : Center of Islamic and Occidental Studies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21111/jios.v1i2.32

Abstract

In the study of Islamic philosophy, De Boer is a representative figure and is considered his thought. His work entitled History of Philosophy in Islam is the first writing that is compiled holistically from the initial period of the formation of Islamic philosophy to the Medieval Period. This paper tries to read De Boer's thoughts in his work and critically analyze the framework he uses. This paper is qualitative in nature by taking the text as its data source, which is analyzed descriptively-critically with a philosophical and historical approach. In his work, De Boer chose "philosophy in Islam" as a term for the tradition of critical thinking in Islamic civilization. With this designation, Muslim philosophers are those who have philosophical thought in Islamic history, with al-Farabi as the originator. According to De Boer, philosophy in Islam is limited to the paripathetic tradition. De Boer's choice of the term "philosophy in Islam" shows his doubts about the authenticity of Islamic philosophy, so that Muslim philosophers only continued the Greek tradition of thought. This frame of mind is typical of Western orientalists. This paper discovers the confusion in De Boer's thinking and proves that the tradition of Islamic thought, Islamic sciences, including Islamic Philosophy, has existed since the beginning of Islam and is original based on the unique Islamic worldview.
Co-Authors Jarman Arroisi