Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

THE PRINCIPLE OF NON-DISCRIMINATION IN HEALTH SERVICES IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF GOVERNMENT RESPONSIBILITY Endang Wahyati Yustina; Anggraeni Endah Kusumaningrum
UNTAG Law Review Vol 3, No 2 (2019): UNTAG LAW REVIEW (ULREV)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (312.264 KB) | DOI: 10.36356/ulrev.v3i2.1419

Abstract

Everyone has the right to receive health services. This is guaranteed in the 1945 Constitution. The government is responsible for making this happen through various health service efforts which include individual health service efforts and public health service efforts. The principle of non-discrimination in health services is a principle that originates from Human Rights. This principle must become the foundation in the implementation of health services, so that everyone must be treated equally and humanely and not discriminatory. Health services that are based on the principle of non-discrimination are the responsibility of the government through the implementation of government functions, in the form of regulation, implementation and supervision of the administration of health services. public services and general principles of good governance, one of which is the principle of non-discrimination. Therefore everyone has the right to get the same treatment to get the right to health services.
Hak atas Informasi Publik dan Hak atas Rahasia Medik: Problema Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Pelayanan Kesehatan Endang Wahyati Yustina
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 1, No 2 (2014): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (615.973 KB)

Abstract

AbstrakDalam era keterbukaan informasi publik, semua informasi menjadi hak bagi publik untuk mengetahuinya, salah satunya adalah informasi kesehatan. Pemerintah menyelenggarakan dan mengatur sistem informasi publik, termasuk sistem informasi kesehatan. Pengembangan sistem informasi kesehatan di antaranya dilakukan melalui sistem pelaporan, pendataan dan pemetaan kasus-kasus kesehatan, termasuk kejadian penyakit. Melalui sistem informasi kesehatan tersebut, pemerintah memberikan kemudahan bagi masyarakat untuk memperoleh hak akses terhadap pelayanan kesehatan dalam upaya meningkatkan derajat kesehatan masyarakat. Hak atas informasi kesehatan merupakan hak dasar sosial yakni the rights to health care yang bersumber dari hak asasi manusia. Sementara itu, dalam pelayanan kesehatan dikenal adanya hak atas rahasia medis (medical secrecy). Hak ini merupakan hak dasar individual yang bersumber dari hak asasi manusia, yakni the rights of self determination. Pada UU KIP, diatur bahwa informasi kesehatan termasuk informasi publik, tetapi informasi kesehatan yang berisi data kesehatan seseorang termasuk informasi yang dikecualikan untuk dibuka kepada publik. Artinya bahwa pada UU KIP juga diberikan jaminan perlindungan terhadap rahasia kedokteran. Persoalannya adalah saat rahasia kedokteran tersebut terkait dengan seseorang yang berpotensi menularkan penyakit kepada orang lain, sementara salah satu strategi penanggulangan yang paling awal adalah melalui pelaporan yang merupakan subsistem informasi kesehatan. Problem yang kemudian muncul adalah hak mana yang perlu didahulukan, apakah hak atas informasi kesehatan terkait penyakit menular ataukah hak individu pasien atas rahasia medisnya untuk dilindungi dan tidak diberitahukan mengenai penyakitnya kepada orang lain.Kata Kunci: informasi publik, informasi kesehatan, hak asasi manusia, hak menentukan badan sendiri, rahasia kedokteran. The Right to Public Information Access and the Right to Medical Secrecy: A Human Rights Issues in Health CareAbstractIn the era of public information disclosure, it is a right for the public to know about most of any information, including one related to health affairs. Public information system, including health information system is organized and regulated by the government. The health information system is conducted through among others reporting, data gathering and mapping of health cases, including disease incidence. Through the health information system, the government provides public convenience to access information on health services, for the improvement of community health. The right to get information is a fundamental social right, which is the rights to health care that derives from human rights principles. Meanwhile, in the other hand, there is something called medical secrecy which is right to confidential medical information. This right is a fundamental individual right derives from human rights principles, namely the rights of self-determination. The Act on KIP says that health information is included into public information but the health information containing a person's health data is categorized to be information that is exempted to be disclosed to the public. This means that the Act on KIP guarantees protection of medical secrecy. A problem appears when the medical secrecy is associated with someone who has the potential to transmit the disease to others whereas one of the earliest prevention steps is by making a report which is indeed to be a subsystem of health information. Therefore, the problem that later arises is which rights that should be put in prior—whether the rights to health information related with transmitted diseases or the patient's individual rights to his/her medical secrecy that should be protected and not be disclosed to public.Keywords: public information, health information, human right, the right of self determination, medical secrecy.DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v1n2.a3