Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search

Studi Fatwa Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) No. 005/MNU-33/VIII/2015 Tentang Hukum Alih Fungsi Lahan Perspektif Maslahah Sulhani Hermawan
Jurnal Hukum Islam Volume 16, Nomor 2, Desember 2018
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah Institut Agama Islam Negeri Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28918/jhi.v16i2.1743

Abstract

This paper highlights that Nahdlatul Ulama (NU), Indonesia’s largest Muslim organizations,contributes its basic principles to food sovereigntyover the country. One of the national contributions is demonstrated throughthe fatwa No. 005/MNU-33/VIII/2015 in Bahtsul Masa’il ad-Diniyyah al-Waqi’iyyah point VII on Land Use Conversion Lawissued when holding the 33rd NU national congress (muktamar) in Jombang, East Java.The fatwa issuance denotes an alternative to enhance Indonesia’s food sovereignty. This present study aims to investigate the Islamic edict concerning land use conversion law in the perspective of maslahah (public interests/benefits). A qualitative approach was employed in this library research. The fatwa No. 005/MNU-33/VIII/2015 in Bahtsul Masa’il ad-Diniyyah al-Waqi’iyyah point VII on Land Use Conversion Law was used as the primary data. The study applies the theory of maslahah to analyze the data. The finding promotes that the law argument over the haram aspect of the land use conversion in the fatwa indicates the existence of maslahah and the prevention of darar (harm conditions) due to the land conversion.
HUKUM ISLAM DAN TRANSFORMASI SOSIAL MASYARAKAT JAHILIYYAH Sulhani Hermawan
Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol 2 No 3 (2014): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun
Publisher : SCAD Independent

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Islamic law is holy commands of God that governs all aspects of the life of every Muslim, and includes legal materials is purely spiritual and religious materials. Islam came to the middle of Jahiliyyah society by bringing Shari'ah (legal sistem) is perfect so as to set a fair and egalitarian relations between human individuals in the community. Clearly, the Qur'an rejects the use of the law of Jahiliyyah which assessed full consideration lust and partiality towards certain groups in power in the society. Furthermore asserted that Islamic law is the only law that should be held down by humans because it comes from Allah and brings the principles of sosial justice and equality. Islamic law stands on the principles that should be maintained in absolute and universal. Those principles are the definitive teachings and the benchmark of understanding and acceptance of Islamic law as a whole. If then there are the rules of the Islamic law that seems incompatible with the egalitarian principles and other principles, then the rule must be read within the context of the surrounding social reality and pay attention to its function as a legal counter to the rules of law applicable non-egalitarian during Jahiliyyah.
TINJAUAN KEADILAN SOSIAL TERHADAP HUKUM TATA PANGAN INDONESIA Sulhani Hermawan Hermawan
Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 24, No 3 (2012)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (414.181 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jmh.16115

Abstract

This paper tries to explore the perspectives of social justice concepts for food laws in Indonesia, especially food and farm. The analysis begin with critical study about positive Laws in Indonesia on food and farm. This is followed by critical study for Regulation of Government on food and farm. Philosophical study of justice and injustice, the facts of injustice for majority of Indonesian farmers, are used to look critically how the positive laws on food and farm become the trigger of the injustice. Tulisan ini mengungkap perspektif keadilan sosial terhadap Hukum Tata Pangan di Indonesia, terutama pangan dan pertanian. Analisis dimulai dengan studi kritis terhadap Undang-Undang di Indonesia tentang tata pangan dan pertanian lalu diikuti dengan studi kritis terhadap beberapa Peraturan Pemerintah yang terkait dengan UU tersebut. Kajian filosofis soal keadilan dan ketidakadilan serta beberapa fakta tentang ketidakadilan yang diderita oleh mayoritas petani Indonesia, dipakai untuk menyoroti secara kritis bagaimana hukum positif tentang tata pangan dan pertanian justru menjadi pemicu ketidakadilan tersebut.
Studi Fatwa Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) No. 005/MNU-33/VIII/2015 Tentang Hukum Alih Fungsi Lahan Perspektif Maslahah Sulhani Hermawan
Jurnal Hukum Islam Volume 16, Nomor 2, Desember 2018
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, University of KH. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28918/jhi.v16i2.1743

Abstract

This paper highlights that Nahdlatul Ulama (NU), Indonesia’s largest Muslim organizations,contributes its basic principles to food sovereigntyover the country. One of the national contributions is demonstrated throughthe fatwa No. 005/MNU-33/VIII/2015 in Bahtsul Masa’il ad-Diniyyah al-Waqi’iyyah point VII on Land Use Conversion Lawissued when holding the 33rd NU national congress (muktamar) in Jombang, East Java.The fatwa issuance denotes an alternative to enhance Indonesia’s food sovereignty. This present study aims to investigate the Islamic edict concerning land use conversion law in the perspective of maslahah (public interests/benefits). A qualitative approach was employed in this library research. The fatwa No. 005/MNU-33/VIII/2015 in Bahtsul Masa’il ad-Diniyyah al-Waqi’iyyah point VII on Land Use Conversion Law was used as the primary data. The study applies the theory of maslahah to analyze the data. The finding promotes that the law argument over the haram aspect of the land use conversion in the fatwa indicates the existence of maslahah and the prevention of darar (harm conditions) due to the land conversion.
Hukum Sunat Perempuan Dalam Pemikiran Musdah Mulia Roudhotul Jannah; Sulhani Hermawan
Jurnal Al-Hakim: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa, Studi Syariah, Hukum dan Filantropi Vol. 4 No. 1 (2022): May 2022
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (953.461 KB) | DOI: 10.22515/alhakim.v4i1.5008

Abstract

Controversy regarding female genital mutilation based on arguments occurred from various circles, both scholars, health experts and academics. Indonesia did not escape the debate. The Indonesian Ulama Council (MUI) and the two largest Islamic Community Organizations (Ormas) in Indonesia issued different fatwas. MUI has a sunnah fatwa, the Batsul Masa'il Institute of Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) has a sunnah and obligatory fatwa, and the Muhammadiyah Tarjih Institute condemns it as haram. In the midst of the heat of this feud, Musdah Mulia, a progressive Muslim feminist, came up with her thoughts on banning female genital mutilation. The focus of this research is Musdah Mulia's thoughts on female genital mutilation. This study aims to determine the characteristics and legal arguments of Musdah Mulia's thoughts on female genital mutilation. This study uses qualitative methods, while in collecting data the author used primary data in the form of interviews and secondary data from literature review in the form of books, articles and publications of scientific papers related to research. As for the analysis, the author used descriptive analysis method, which is a way of writing that prioritizes observations of actual symptoms, events and conditions in the present and then concludes things that are considered important and relevant. The results of the research show that Musdah Mulia's thoughts on female genital mutilation based on the arguments in the Al-Qur'an and Hadits. Musdah also emphasized aspects of benefit, basic medical and human rights. Practicing female circumcision is tantamount to doing things that are dangerous to women. Therefore, based on the above considerations, Musdah Mulia said the appropriate rule of law is la ḍarara wa la ḍirar, the meaning of which is to stay away from something dangerous is prioritized. Abstrak Kontroversi mengenai sunat perempuan dengan dilandaskan argumentasi-argumentasi terjadi dari berbagai kalangan, baik ulama, ahli kesehatan maupun akademisi. Indonesia tidak luput dari perdebatan tersebut. Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI) dan juga dua Organisasi Kemasyarakatan (Ormas) Islam terbesar di Indonesia mengeluarkan fatwa yang berbeda. MUI berfatwa sunnah, Lembaga Batsul Masa’il dari Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) berfatwa sunnah dan wajib, dan Lembaga Tarjih Muhammadiyah menghukumi haram. Di tengah hangatnya perseteruan ini, Musdah Mulia, seorang feminis muslim progresif, muncul dengan pemikirannya yang melarang sunat perempuan. Fokus dari penelitian ini adalah pemikiran Musdah Mulia tentang sunat perempuan. Penelitian ini memiliki tujuan untuk mengetahui karakteristik dan juga argumentasi hukum pemikiran Musdah Mulia tentang sunat perempuan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif, dalam mengumpulkan data penulis menggunakan data primer berupa wawancara dan data sekunder kajian kepustakaan berupa buku, artikel dan publikasi karya ilmiah. Analisis yang penulis gunakan metode deskriptif analisis, yaitu cara penulisan yang mengutamakan pengamatan terhadap gejala, peristiwa dan kondisi aktual pada masa kini kemudian menyimpulkan hal-hal yang dianggap penting dan relevan. Hasil dari penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pemikiran Musdah Mulia tentang sunat perempuan didasarkan oleh dalil-dalil dalam Al-Qur’an dan Hadis. Musdah juga menekankan aspek kemaslahatan, dasar medis dan hak asasi manusia. Dengan melakukan praktik sunat perempuan berarti sama saja dengan melakukan hal yang berbahaya kepada perempuan. Oleh karenanya, berdasarkan pertimbangan-pertimbangan di atas, Musdah Mulia mengatakan kaidah hukum yang tepat adalah la ḍarara wa la ḍirar, maksudnya adalah menjauhi sesuatu yang membahayakan diutamakan.
Negara, Politik Identitas, dan Makar: Pandangan Organisasi Massa Islam Tentang Makar dan Upaya Pencegahannya Melalui PERPPU Ormas Sulhani Hermawan; Sidik Sidik
Al-Ahkam Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah dan Hukum Vol. 6 No. 1 (2021): Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum
Publisher : IAIN Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22515/alahkam.v6i1.3993

Abstract

The discourse of mass organization dismissal of Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia (HTI) by the government through the Government Regulation in Lieu of Law No. 2/2017 (Perppu), that now has been officially being the mass organization regulation, causes pro and contra.This article analyses the substance of the differencies of HTI, NU, and Muhammadiyah opinion about violant attack (makar) and Perppu as its rule to protect it. It also analyses the rationale and reason of their opinion. This article finds two points: First, HTI noted that their activities were not a violant attack but the religious proselytizing (dakwah) so that the dimissal act through Perppu, according to them, was not appropriate. Meanwhile, NU said that HTI activities were a violant attack and they supported itsdismissal through Perppu. Whereas Muhammadiyah argued that the contradiction toward national idology is a violant attack but it dimissal has to be constitutional. Second, based on the social dialectic theory, this article notes that the differencies of these mass organization opinion were influenced by their different conception on nation that internalized when they looked at the problem of violant attack and Perppu. According to the political identity theory, each mass organization brings religious knowledge identity that fitted together, especially concerning Perppu.   Diskursus terkait penonaktifan organisasi massa (ormas) Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia (HTI) oleh pemerintah melalui Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang No. 2 tahun 2017 (Perppu Ormas), yang kemudian disahkan menjadi UU Ormas, memunculkan pro-kontra. Artikel ini mengkaji bagaimana substansi perbedaan pandangan HTI, Nahdhatul Ulama (NU), dan Muhammadiyah (MU) tentang makar dan Perppu sebagai payung hukum pencegahannya. Lantas, apa sebenarnya yang melandasi perbedaan pandangan tersebut. Kajian ini menemukan beberapa hal. Pertama, HTI berpandangan bahwa aktivitas mereka bukan makar melainkan aktivitas dakwah sehingga pembubarannya melalui Perppu dinilai tidak beralasan. Sementara NU memandang aktivitas HTI adalah makar dan mendukung pembubarannya melalui Perppu. Adapun Muhammadiyah berpandangan bahwa yang bertentangan dengan ideologi negara adalah makar, tapi pencegahannya harus secara konstitusional. Kedua, merujuk pada teori dialektika sosial, perbedaan sikap masing-masing ormas dipengaruhi oleh pandangan mereka tentang konsepsi negara yang terinternalisasi dalam menyikapi persoalan makar dan pencegahannya melalui Perppu. Sementara berdasarkan teori politik identitas, masing-masing ormas mengusung identitas pemahaman keagamaan yang saling beririsan terkait Perppu.
MENARIK BENANG MERAH IMPLEMENTASI MERDEKA BELAJAR-KAMPUS MERDEKA DI UNIVERSITAS NEGERI MEDAN DAN UNIVERSITAS SYIAH KUALAH BANDA ACEH Susilo Surahman; Muhammad Julijanto; Sulhani Hermawan
Muróbbî: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022): September
Publisher : Fakultas Tarbiyah Institut Agama Islam Bani Fattah Jombang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52431/murobbi.v6i2.1079

Abstract

On the one hand, independent campuses gave birth to new learning concepts and strengthened cooperation networks with parties outside the university. But on the other hand, the separate campus faces various obstacles in its implementation. This paper aims to explain the implementation of Merdeka Belajar-Kampus Merdeka (MBKM) at Medan State University and Syiah Kuala University Banda Aceh. This research is a type of field research—data collection through observation, interviews, and documentation. Data analysis is carried out descriptively by triangulation. The results showed that Medan State University and Syiah Kuala University Banda Aceh applied the same pattern: the learning block model outside higher education, the non-block learning model outside higher education, and the acceleration model. Meanwhile, the obstacle faced by these two universities is the readiness factor.