Muhammad Fauzan Pratama
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

THE INFLUENCE OF LANGUAGE LEARNING STRATEGIES TOWARDS READING COMPREHENSION Muhammad Fauzan Pratama; Agustinus Bambang Setiyadi; Flora Flora
U-JET Vol 4, No 6 (2015): U-JET
Publisher : FKIP UNILA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (167.039 KB)

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui jenis strategi pembelajaran bahasa yang digunakan siswa dalam pemahaman membaca dan untuk mengetahui pengaruh penggunaan strategi pembelajaran bahasa terhadap pemahaman membaca. Penelitian ini dilakukan kepada 30 siswa di kelas X.9 di SMAN 14 Bandar Lampung. Peneliti memberikan kuesioner strategi pembelajaran bahasa dan tes pemahaman membaca. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ada 15 siswa yang menggunakan strategi kognitif, sementara ada 9 siswa yang menggunakan strategi metakognitif dan strategi sosial yang 6 siswa. Kemudian, hasil dari One-Way ANOVA menunjukkan bahwa F untuk strategi kognitif adalah 37,18 dengan p = 0,000, F untuk strategi metakognitif adalah 15,75 dengan p = 0,000, dan F untuk strategi sosial adalah 5.97 dengan p = .001. Hasil tersebut berarti bahwa H1 diterima, sehingga strategi kognitif, metakognitif, dan sosial secara statistik signifikan untuk pemahaman membaca. The aims of this research were to find out the type of language learning strategy that was used by students in reading comprehension and to find out the influence of using language learning strategies toward reading comprehension. This research was conducted to 30 students in class X.9 at SMAN 14 Bandar Lampung. Questionnaire of language learning strategies and reading comprehension test were given as the instruments. The results showed that there were 15 students who used cognitive strategy, while there were 9 students who used metacognitive strategy and social strategy were 6 students. Then, the result of One-Way ANOVA showed that F for cognitive strategy was 37.18 with p= .000, F for metacognitive strategy was 15.75 with p= .000, and F for social strategy was 5.97 with p= .001. The results mean that H1 was accepted, so that the cognitive, metacognitive, and social strategies were statistically significant to reading comprehension.Keywords: language learning strategies, influence, reading comprehension