Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Indonesian Journal of Religion and Society
Gumilar Rusliwa Somantri
Universitas Indonesia
Religion Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Membebaskan Ilmu Sosial dari Keterperangkapan Ganda Gumilar Rusliwa Somantri
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Vol 9, No 2 (2005): NOVEMBER (Potret Ilmu-ilmu Sosial)
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1691.499 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jsp.11032

Abstract

Social Science in Indonesia facing the challenge to he more authonomous. The science and scientist have to involve themself in a productive dialog with the Western tradition and at the same time, play a significant role in answering the problems related to the ongoing social change. It seems, it is a must for social science to escape itself from the multiple traps of assumption, theory, methodology and orientation, in order to answer successfully the challenge of dynamics of humanity and civilization.
Social Conflict among Mining Company and Community Ricardi S Adnan; Gumilar Rusliwa Somantri
Indonesian Journal of Religion and Society Vol 4, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Indonesian Center for Religion and Society Studies (InTReSt)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36256/ijrs.v4i1.246

Abstract

Conflicts between communities and mining companies in the district Alpha Sulawesi was a series of problems the last few years. This study found that the problems occurred between the community and mining companies were based on distorted social interactions, namely communication problems that did not work perfectly. By using a mixed method, this study which is included in the action research category found that the problem of perception and interpretation was a dominant factor in causing disputes to tension. Following the framework of Miller & Sinclair (2012), perceptions that arise and develop include physical, economic, environmental, and social issues. Through a quantitative approach with interviews using questionnaires to as many as 260 respondents spread across 13 villages and 3 sub-districts and a qualitative approach through in-depth interviews and group discussions with influential figures in these villages and PTMS management. Using the framework of Resource community member’s perception of coal industry risk and benefit, the results of this study also found differences in viewpoints in viewing environmental aspects of public health and social care.
Co-Authors Ricardi S. Adnan