Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

JUDICIAL ACTIVISM OR SELF-RESTRAINT : SOME INSIGHT INTO THE INDONESIAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT Radian Salman; Sukardi Sukardi; Mohammad Syaiful Aris
Yuridika Vol. 33 No. 1 (2018): Volume 33 No 1 January 2018
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

The Constitutional Court of Republic of Indonesia is centralized judicial review institution which implements a posteriori and abstract control. Constitutional court decision often politically sensitive and involve important issues. On the one hand handing down strong decisions that uphold important constitutional principles can bring great benefits to citizens and can strengthen support for democracy but on the other hand, strong role of the court in judicial review tends to encroach increasingly on the territory of the law making institution. This article examines the decision of constitutional court in the framework of a tension between constitutionalism and democracy, especially from theoretical or conceptual approach. As result of examining its decisions, Indonesian Constitutional Court may reflect two characters; judicial activism as characterized by acting as law-maker and using policy in judicial decisions and/ or judicial self-restraint. Recent Indonesian experience shows that judicial review of legislation is not a simply of judicial control over law-making institution, as it brings tension in the context of power relations in the scheme of separation of power. Relationship between the court and legislature, in respective of judicial review, will culminate in the philosophy of the judiciary. However, as constitutionalism and democracy are virtue, decisions of the Constitutional Court in judicial review should create mode of self-limitation within the framework of the principle of separation of powers.

Penataan Sistem Pemilihan Umum yang Berkeadilan untuk Penguatan Sistem Presidensiil Di Indonesia Mohammad Syaiful Aris
Yuridika Vol. 33 No. 2 (2018): Volume 33 No 2 May 2018
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Justice in election one of the constitutional mandates expressly in Article 22E Paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the State of the Republic of Indonesia. Nevertheless the Constitution does not provide further guidance on what the meaning of justice in election. Therefore, it is necessary to search philosophically what exactly the meaning of justice in the election. An alternative system is needed as a bridge between the proportional system and the district system. An alternative system must be able to create a minimum majority party in parliament to support presidential policies, improve the accountability the member of parlements and accommodate heterogeneous groups.

Pembentukan Peradilan Khusus Penyelesaian Hasil Pemilihan Kepala Daerah dalam Pelaksanaan Pemilu Serentak Nasional Mohammad Syaiful Aris
Media Iuris Vol. 5 No. 3 (2022): MEDIA IURIS
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/mi.v5i3.34154

AbstractThe urgency of establishing a special court for resolving election disputes because this special court is an order of Law Number 8 of 2015 which must be formed before the implementation of the national simultaneous regional elections in 2024. Although, in its development, The Constitutional Court Decision Number 85/PUU-XX/2022, the Constitutional Court has the authority to examine and adjudicate cases of disputes over election results are no longer limited to “until the establishment of a special judicial body”, but will be permanent, because such a special judicial body will no longer be formed. However, this is considered less than ideal. This study aims to outline the urgency of a special judiciary for the resolution of regional head election results in the implementation of national simultaneous elections using conceptual and statutory approaches. The results showed that it is necessary to establish a special judicial model for national simultaneous elections, which is a special judiciary that is ad hoc under the general judicial environment of the Supreme Court. For the seat of the special judiciary for dispute resolution, the regional elections are placed on the High Court to resolve disputes over the results of elections in the province as is the model of the corruption court based in the provincial capital so that the budget for the establishment and management of this special judiciary is not too large. Keywords: Election; Election Law; Special Courts for Regional Head Elections. AbstrakUrgensi pembentukan peradilan khusus penyelesaian sengketa pilkada karena peradilan khusus ini merupakan perintah Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2015 yang harus dibentuk sebelum pelaksanaan Pilkada serentak nasional tahun 2024. Walaupun, dalam perkembangannya Putusan MK Nomor 85/PUU-XX/2022, Mahkamah Konstitusi berwenang memeriksa dan mengadili perkara perselisihan hasil pemilihan tidak lagi terbatas hanya “sampai dibentuknya badan peradilan khusus”, melainkan akan bersifat permanen, karena badan peradilan khusus demikian tidak lagi akan dibentuk. Tetapi, hal tersebut dirasa kurang ideal. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguraikan urgensi peradilan khusus penyelesaian hasil pemilihan kepala daerah dalam pelaksanaan pemilu serentak nasional dengan menggunakan pendekatan konseptual dan perundang-undangan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perlu dibentuk suatu model peradilan khusus untuk pemilu serentak nasional, yang merupakan sebuah Peradilan khusus yang bersifat ad hoc di bawah lingkungan peradilan umum pada Mahkamah Agung. Untuk tempat kedudukan Peradilan khusus penyelesaian sengketa Pilkada diletakan pada Peradilan Tinggi untuk menyelesaikan sengketa hasil pilkada di wilayah propinsi tersebut sebagaimana model pengadilan tindak pidana korupsi yang berkedudukan di ibukota propinsi sehingga anggaran untuk pendirian dan pengelolaan peradilan khusus ini tidak terlalu besar. Kata Kunci: Pemilu; Hukum Pemilu; Peradilan Khusus Hasil Pemilihan Kepala Daerah.

Opportunities and Challenges in the Implementation of Plurality - Majority (District) Electoral System for Strengthening the Indonesian Presidential System Mohammad Syaiful Aris
Yuridika Vol. 37 No. 3 (2022): Volume 37 No 3 September 2022
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/ydk.v37i3.37604

Presidential government system has its own disadvantages, one of them is the possibility a minority president presence in this system, namely a president who is not supported by a parliamentary majority, even though the President has a strong mandate from public, but with a minority position, the government’s agenda which carried out by the president could be hampered by parliament or the legislature, therefore it is needed a coalition government. The combination of a presidential system with a multi-party system is difficult to implement because whoever the president is elected will be encountered with a certain condition that it is impossible to support him in parliament without forming a coalition. In order to respond the problem in strengthening the presidential system in Indonesia, the author offers a majority general election system or district system (first Past the Post) as an effort to create an effective and responsible government. This is a legal study which used two approaches, namely statutory approach and conceptual approach. Based on the results of study, it can be concluded that the majority system was more appropriate for creating an effective and responsible government because it could encourage the simplification of political parties and the responsibilities of people’s representatives to the voters in each district.

THE BLOCKCHAIN-BASED ON E-VOTING IN THE LOCAL ELECTIONS SYSTEM: AN EFFORT TO REALIZE E-DEMOCRACY Mohammad Syaiful Aris; Dita Elvia Kusuma Putri; Gio Arjuna Putra; Xavier Nugraha
Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum Vol 10, No 1 (2023): Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum
Publisher : UNISSULA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26532/jph.v10i1.22811

E-voting in post-conflict local elections is still a long debate. One of the reasons is related to the security problem e-voting. Over time, system blockchain born which is known unhackable. Therefore, will analyze, first, urgency using e-voting in post-conflict local election system and secondly the formulation use of blockchain-based e-voting in the post-conflict local election system. The method research is legal research with statute approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. As for the results of the study: first, urgency using blockchain in regional head election system, because there are still many problems, namely: 1) Multiple voter data which results in voters being able to vote more than one time, 2) There are still ballots that have been voted, due irresponsible persons, 3) Distribution of ballot boxes and ballots have problems both before and after voting, and 4) Many post-conflict local election officers died and got sick due to fatigue while on duty, and secondly, the formulation use blockchain in electronic-based regional head election system, must considered: 1) review readiness of districts/cities, 2) Making rules with stakeholders, 3) Resource training humans, 4) Socialization to the community, 5) The implementation is carried out systematically tiered, 6) Implement pilot project before implemented.

Title

Found 5 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 5 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 5 Documents
Search