Darwinsyah Minin
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search
Journal : The 2nd Proceeding Indonesia Clean of Corruption in 2020"

RECONSTRUCTION OF STATUS AND AUTHORITY OF THE SHARIA COURT IN THE NATIONAL JUDICIAL SYSTEM BASED ON JUSTICE Jufri Ghalib; Darwinsyah Minin
The 2nd Proceeding “Indonesia Clean of Corruption in 2020" Table Of Content
Publisher : The 2nd Proceeding “Indonesia Clean of Corruption in 2020"

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Article 25 of Law No. 18 of 2001 on Special Autonomy for the Special Province of Aceh as Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam province mandated that the Islamic Law Judicial in Aceh province as part of the national judicial system undertaken by Mahkamah Syar‟iyah (Sharia Courts) free from the influence of any party. For the implementation of these norms, Presidential Decree No. 11 of 2003 specifies Pengadilan Agama (Religious Courts)  that had existed in the province of Aceh should be converted into Sharia Court and Pengadilan Tinggi Agama (High Courts of  Religious Courts) in Banda Aceh should be converted into Sharia Court of the Province of Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam. Sharia Court's authority is further stipulated by Aceh Qanun. The provisions of Article 25 of Law No. 18 of 2001 are then confirmed by Article 128 to Article 137 of Law Number 11 Year 2006 concerning the Government of Aceh. Specificity of Sharia Court in Aceh Province, among others, can be seen from its absolute competencies which is based on Islamic law in the national judicial system. Furthermore, Article 128 paragraph (3) of Law Number 11 Year 2006 concerning Aceh Government and Article 49 of the Qanun Aceh Province Number 10 Year 2002 regarding Islamic Law Judicial , make it clear that the absolute competencies of Sharia Court covers judge actions in ahwal al-syakhsiyah field (family law), mu'amalah (civil law) and jinayah (criminal law), which is based on Islamic law. Struggle enforceability instituting Islamic law formally in the province of Aceh in order to have a status in the state administration by law has been successfully agreed with the promulgation of  Law No. 18 of 2001 and Law No. 11 Year 2006. Granting authority to implement Islamic law, legally embodies the implementation of Law No. 44 of 1999 on Implementation Features Special Province of Aceh. Based on the background of historical studies Sharia Court which is now the place to resolve the problem of Muslims, and in view of the Sharia Court is judicative power under Article 128 paragraph (1) of Law Number 11 Year 2006 concerning Aceh Government included in the environment of religious judicial body under the Supreme Court by Act No. 48 of 2009 on judicial power which stipulates that judicial power is implemented by the four environments of judicial bodies, namely the Public Judicial Body, Religious Judicial Body, Military Judicial Body and State‟s Administrative Judicial Body.   Occurred a noticeable difference between the two laws in the judicial seat of Islamic law in Aceh in the order of the national judicial system. Law Number 11 Year 2006 seat Islamic Law Judicial as part of the national judicial system in religious judicial body, whereas Law Number 50 Year 2009 seat Islamic Law Judicials as a special court which is in the  two environmentals of judicial bodies, religious judicial body and public judicial body in accordance with its judicial authority being absolute competence. Settings on the Islamic Law Judicial  are different from one law with other legislation can lead to differences in interpretations. The differences in interpretation or disharmony of the legislation will result in the emergence of problems at the level of implementation. The problems that have been described above are taken as the reason to do research with the title " Reconstruction of Status and Authority of Sharia Courts in National Judicial System Based on Justice of Islamic Law "
RECONSTRUCTION LAW OF PUNISHMENT AGAINST CHILDREN NARCOTICS ABUSE-BASED PROGRESSIVE LAW Salomo Ginting; Darwinsyah Minin
The 2nd Proceeding “Indonesia Clean of Corruption in 2020" Table Of Content
Publisher : The 2nd Proceeding “Indonesia Clean of Corruption in 2020"

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Children who do not abuse drugs merely as criminals, but as victims. Second, starting from the thought that children who abuse drugs are also victims, efforts to provide protection for children who abuse drugs is also a priority. This study aims to determine the legal construction of the criminal prosecution against perpetrators of child abusers of narcotics, criminal prosecution against perpetrators of child abusers of narcotics, as well as the reconstruction of criminal law against perpetrators of child abusers of narcotic-based progressive law. This study is normative, ie methods that describe or explain a fact systematically later analysis done legally with the linking of the data and facts obtained convictions related to child abusers of narcotics and associated with the legislation. Reconstruction of sentencing child abusers of narcotics with the principle of diversion and restorative justice with due regard to the principle of the best interests of the child that is no crime to children, through the reconstruction of Article 127 paragraph (1) of Law No. 35 of 2009 by adding provisions stated in Article 127 paragraph ( 1) a, b, and c does not apply to child abusers of narcotics, and every child abusers of narcotics required to undergo medical rehabilitation. it can realize the decision imposing the rehabilitation of child abusers of narcotics as a punishment-based progressive law in realizing the restorative justice. Law enforcement officials must work together and build a shared perception of the protection against child abusers of narcotics. The concept of diversion and restorative justice are two concepts which aims to find an alternative solution to the child offender drug abuse. The concept of diversion undertaken by maximizing the discretion possessed by law enforcement officials who handles children with problems with the law. The concept of restorative justice should be carried out with an understanding of the victim, the perpetrator, the victim's family and the family of the perpetrator and the community to work together to determine appropriate action against the medical rehabilitation of drug abusers of children. Keywords: Punishment, the Child Abuse To Narcotics and Law Progressive
THE RECONSTRUCTION OF LEGAL AID LAW FOR CHILDREN WHO GETCONFLICT WITH LAW IN PROCESS OF JUSTIFICATION FOR CHILDRENBASED ON THE VALUE OF PANCASILA Adi Mansar; Darwinsyah Minin
The 2nd Proceeding “Indonesia Clean of Corruption in 2020" Table Of Content
Publisher : The 2nd Proceeding “Indonesia Clean of Corruption in 2020"

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Indonesia country is a constitutional  which is coming from the law number three/ MPR / 2000 about the law an the order of rules of law. Chapter 28D verse one stated “everyone has a right in testimonial, guarantee, protection, and the law which must be fair and have the same treatment in law. Constitution has given the guarantee that all of society, will not be treated discriminatively and forbid the human right based on the chapter 28 verse 2 stated “everyone has a right to be free from the discriminated action and get the protection for the  discriminative things.  Pancasila as the ideology and the rules of social live in Indonesia has become a priority with the vision to guarantee the process of life and nation character, in order all of Indonesian society has aright to get law protection, therefore the little children.  Some helps from law for children who get conflict with law, the treatment be difference with adults, children have no ability to protect their own right, many side convince their live, the country and society have importance to protect children. Based on the abstract above , so the problem study is formulated below : 1. How the setting of legal aid the children who have conflict with law in the process of children law is positive right now? 2. How is the application of legal aid the children who have the conflict with law is positive nowadays? 3. How is the reconstruction of legal aid for children who have the conflict with the law in process of legalization for children based on the value of  Pancasila? Based an Soerjono Soekanto, the base of theory is using paradigm. Where the paradigm is divided in two three kind, they are : 1. Paradigm means law, 2.) paradigm differenciate law, 3.) paradigm as the laws order sector. The kind of research is a sociological yuridis law research or empirical yurudis. According to kirk and miller, the qualitative research is a certain tradition in social science fundamentally depended on the observation of human in the region and term. According to sugiyono the method of qualitative is suitable to be used in the research which the problem is unclean, and it is being done in the narrow social situation, so the result of this research will be deeper. According to Soerjono Soekanto the qualitative  approach is actually the research which result is descriptive.  The research uses the social legal research approach, tamahana states that socio-legal studied is given to law and society studies. Based on F.X. Adji samekto, social legal studies form the law as norm and reality, researcher in socio legal studies demand the controller of law which have been built in the knowledge of law it self ( as the apriory law and unlimited of values), and the domination of how theories work. As the consequen which look at as a reality.  The location of research is in Medan city (the court of law grade 1A, Medan, the office of public prosecutor, resort police office medan, PERADI). This research uses the primary data and secondary data and the object of tertiery law.  The technique of data collecting has been done by observation and interview with the key informan whom have been decided by researcher based on the charasteristic of research. To get the accurate data, it needs sampling distribution and random decision whether it is simple and more difficult.  The respondents whom will be asked are law practitioner and advocates, policeman, lawyer, public prosecutor. Meanwhile the collecting of secondary data, is being done by library research (documentation) that is a chronological way to find out the data by reading, analyzing, classifying and being done by the understanding of law as reflected in rules, the literature which is relevant with the problems.  The technique of analysis with the primary data, the researcher uses the technique of data analysis and type is strauss and J.Corbin, by analyzing the data since the researcher was in the field. Then  the researcher arranges the category of the data in term on theme. After the data has been given the validation, the researcher did the reconstruction and analysis with the qualitative inductive to answer the problem.  The technique of validation has a purpose to know the validity of data which has been got in the research. The technique which is used is triangulation for the source, they are : 1. By comparing the data which has been taken from observation with the data which has been taken form the result of interview with the informant. 2. By doing the comparison between perception, point of view and general opinion and the opinion research. 3. By comparing the result of interview with library research after the triangulation process done. The researcher will decide the valid data which will be used as a material for research.  The grand theory which is used in this dissertation is the theory of justice. 1. John Rawls theory about justice.  Based on john rawls in the book of “ a theory of justice “ explains the theory of social  condition as the difference principl, is the social difference and economy must be settled to give a benefit for them who are not lucky. The term of social economy different in the different principal to answer. The difference in prospect of someone to get the element of welfare income and authority. Meanwhile the principal of fair equality of opportunity shows them who have low chance to achieve the prospect of wealth, authority and income. Themselves must be given the special protection. 2. John Stuart Mill’s Justice Theory  Based on john stuart mill’s idea of utilitarianism, there are two kinds. They are happiness and truth. Mill stated the happiness and the truth as the assumption which the base of thinking about justice based on utilitarian perspective. Mill stated the purpose of life is the happiness and there is no pain, but mill stated that the justice is not sui generis because depended on functions. Mills approach through the justice is placed in analysis about logics and morality sense, started from the unfair things in society and it build is the universal concept to analyze it. Mills stated the justice theory which is separated from the function prosecution. 3. The theory of Pancasila justice  Pancasila is the philosophy for Indonesian country and laws of 1945 is source of law for all of rules of Indonesian laws. Laws manage every single life is element in a nation. So the justice can be built continuously and it has purpose for country to achieve welfare of society. One of nation purpose is to create the justice for everyone, that thing consist in the second part and fifth in pancasila. As well as can be seen in the principal of thought in UUD NRI 1945 and country is willing to create the social justice for all of people in Indonesia. 4. The theory of restorative  The restorative justice is a form of justice which is centered for the need of victim, the criminals and society. The approach of restorative justice is a paradigm to be used as a strategy and frame in handling crime problems which answer the dissatisfaction of justice system of criminal nowadays. The restorative approach is assumed as the changing of model and mechanism which work in the justice system in handling the problems of criminal nowadays. The middle theory is the system law theory of Lawrence M. Friedman. As a system, friedman divides the system of law into the three element, they are: a. Legal structure, b. Legal substance, c. Legal culture. Friedman states the law can not be straighten if there is no credible law upholder, competent and also independent. The weak of mentality in laws upholder cause the inability to straight up the law as well. The dissertation applied theory uses the progressive theory, the concept of progressive law was born and developing from the dissatisfaction feeling from the expert of law through the theory and traditional law practice which develop and criticize the asymmetrical between law and theory ( law in books) with the law in action, and the failure from law in giving the respon through the problems which happened in society. The progressive law is started from the basic assumption, law is the institution which has a purpose to transport the human in to the balance life, wealth and make the human get the happiness. Law it self does not reflect the law as the absolute and final, but is decided by it is ability to serve human. Characteristic of progressive law based on satjipto rahardjo is : law is presented to serve the society. a.) progressive law will be still exist because the law will always be on it is position as the law in the making and will not be final as long as human present, so the progressive law will always be exist to arrange to life of society. b.) in progressive law, the ethnic and humanity moral will be very strong, which will give the respon for the developing and human needs and serve the justice and wealth.  The process of green table of children who have conflict with law in the civil court of law based on the reguirement of chapter 5 2/ till chapter 62 laws numb 11, 2012 about the system of  Crime Judicature. In the court of law, ist class in Medan, the process of green table for children who hare the conflikt with law based on the reguiremen of law is the laws numb 11, 2012 about system of crime judicature of children and KUHAP.
RECONSTRUCTION OF CONSUMER PROTECTION LAW IN MAKING THE BALANCE BUSINESS BASED BUSINESS AND CONSUMER VALUE OF JUSTICE Ramon Nofrial; Darwinsyah Minin
The 2nd Proceeding “Indonesia Clean of Corruption in 2020" Table Of Content
Publisher : The 2nd Proceeding “Indonesia Clean of Corruption in 2020"

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The existence of Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection guarantee the fulfillment of the rights of consumers to consume goods and services produced by businesses, as well as achieving a balance between consumer and business. Specifications are preskriftif analytical research. This study is a prescriptive offered the concept to solve a problem, highlight something (object) aspired or should be. Is a descriptive analysis, which is to describe all the symptoms and the facts and analyzing the problems that exist in the present. In respect of consumer protection in realizing the balance of businesses and consumers based on values of justice as an effort towards a welfare state based on Pancasila and the Constitution NRI Year 1945 made to the monitoring of the use clause like to give certain restrictions that do not diminish the rights of consumers, the application of strict liability businesses ( strict liability), consumer dispute resolution pursuant to Act No. 8 of 1999, not tort (KUHPdt), and the addition of Article 45 in paragraph (2) which states: in the consumer dispute resolution in civil and criminal can not be charged back, before businesses found not guilty, and Article 63 paragraph (1) reconstructed into: criminal sanctions as referred to in Article 62, can be imposed additional penalties, such as: Deprivation of certain goods; Verdict; Payment of compensation; and the obligation of withdrawal of goods from circulation. Keyword: Consumer Protection, Balance, Businessmen, Consumer, The Value Of  Justice
RECONSTRUCTION OF LAND USED RIGHT EIGENDOM VALUES BASED ON JUSTICE AND LEGAL CERTAINTY Hakim Tua Harahap; Darwinsyah Minin
The 2nd Proceeding “Indonesia Clean of Corruption in 2020" Table Of Content
Publisher : The 2nd Proceeding “Indonesia Clean of Corruption in 2020"

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Eigendom rights is a right over the land west of Indonesia, including the rights of the fallen or been converted, by UUPA. UUPA determines that a conversion limit is per 24 September 1980. This means that the owner of the rights given 20 years to take care of the conversion. If the land is not converted, land rights eiqendom. back into the land controlled by the state. Many people tried to obtain recognition of the former land eigendom rights. Based on the formulation of the problem and research objectives, that the problem of this research included one land law policy in formulating the right to land former eigendom rights. Normative juridical approach used to determine the extent of legal principle, synchronization vertical / horizontal, and systemic law is applied, which is based on secondary data, namely primary legal materials, secondary, and tertiary. The results of the research that the conception of legal land ownership in Indonesia includes a system of feudal land law, land law west by Burgerlijk Wetboek (KUHPdt), customary land laws. Land administration system in Indonesia consists of land administration in the reign of the Netherlands, in the aftermath of independence before the entry into force of the UUPA, and according to the UUPA. Legal certainty of land rights through the conversion of the former eigendom apply for rights under the UUPA. Reconstruction of the right to land the former right eigndom based on values of justice and the rule of law, namely, Article 24 of Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 reconstructed by adding the provisions of paragraph (3), which reads: That the provisions referred to in paragraph (2) give the right priority to the filing acquire rights on the ground as the provisions of the Basic Agrarian Law. Thereby granting the priority right to apply for rights to land former eigendom rights to public tenants or people who control the land which has been controlled by the state, and because PT. Agra Citra Kharisma has provided compensation to the rights holders of priority, then the PT. Agra Citra Kharisma acquire a priority right to apply for rights eigendom vervording No. 33. That the need of holding a confirmation of the rules governing the rights eigendom lands is to avoid confusion which would certainly harm to all parties, especially the rightsholders on the ground eigendom. Keyword : Land, Justice, Legal Certainly
IDEAL RECONSTRUCTION OF REHABILITATION PUNISHMENT FOR NARCOTICS ADDICTS AND ABUSER'S VICTIMS JUSTIFIED BASED ON THE LAW OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA NO. 35 YEAR 2009(CASE STUDY IN SUMATERA UTARA PROVINCE) Ahmad Zaini; Gunarto Gunarto; Darwinsyah Minin
The 2nd Proceeding “Indonesia Clean of Corruption in 2020" Table Of Content
Publisher : The 2nd Proceeding “Indonesia Clean of Corruption in 2020"

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The Law of The Republic of Indonesia No. 35 year 2009 article 54 states that every drug addicts and abusers’ victims shall undergo medical rehabilitation and social rehabilitation, affirmed on article 103 that explains the Judge who examines the case of narcotics addicts, may decide to order the concerned to undergo treatment and/or treatment through rehabilitation, if the narcotics addict are proven guilty of a crime of narcotics, or set out to order the concerned to undergo treatment and/or treatment through rehabilitation, if the Narcotics Addict is not found guilty of a crime of Narcotics. For the Law of The Republic of Indonesia No. 35 year 2009 above to be done, a Joint Regulation between 7 (seven) Ministries/Institutions about The Handling of Narcotics Addicts and Abuser’s Victims into Rehabilitation Institutions was made in order to create an equation of perception about the punishment that should be dropped for narcotics addicts and abuser’s victims defendants is for them to be punished or set in to rehabilitation. However, in Sumatera Utara Province the narcotics addicts and abusers victims defendants are obviously set to be imprisoned for 2 – 4 years long, or even more. In other words, the rehabilitation penalty is still so far from expectation compared to imprisonment. The purpose of this script is to acknowledge the obstacles and interferences that cause the Judge to set the narcotics addicts and abuser’s victims defendants into imprisonment more than to order and/or set them out to undergo rehabilitation treatment. It is also to look further to the investigation process by the investigator, continued by the prosecution by the Prosecutor, up until the Judge’s judgement and its implementation in correctional facilities or rehabilitation institutions. Furthermore, the ideal reconstruction that should be done in order to the Law of The Republic of Indonesia No. 35 year 2009 about the narcotics addicts and abuser’s victims to be effectively functionate, where the punishment of the narcotics addicts and abuser’s victims is to be judged or set out to undergo treatment through rehabilitation. The theories used in this research are 1) Grand theory, which is The Theory of Justice, 2) Middle theory, which consists of Theory of Protection and Theory of the Work of Law, 3) Applied Theory, which includes The Theory of The Purpose of Law and The Theory of Progressive Law. The Law of The Republic of Indonesia No. 35 year 2009 is based on justice, therefore it needs some reconstruction on the article 127 so that it would not create any doubt in the action because it is considered to develop ambiguous interpretation due to its indecisiveness that leads it to be the last article of the law in judging the narcotics addicts and abuser’s victims defendants position. The reconstruction of The Law of The Republic of Indonesia No. 35 year 2009 article 127 is expected to deprive the interpretation dualism of the narcotics addicts and abuser’s victims defendants.Keywords : Rekonstruction, Rehabilitation Punishment, Narcotics Addicts and Abuser’s Victims.
RECONSTRUCTION OF DIVERSION CONCEPT IN CHILD PROTECTION OF CONFLICT WITH THE LAWS BASED ON THE VALUE OF JUSTICE Ulina Marbun; Darwinsyah Minin
The 2nd Proceeding “Indonesia Clean of Corruption in 2020" Table Of Content
Publisher : The 2nd Proceeding “Indonesia Clean of Corruption in 2020"

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

A paradigm of punishment for children in Juvenile Criminal Justice System has been changing form retibutive approach toward restorative justice approach.. Diversion is used as an instrument of restorative justice impelementation, Diversion plays dominant role to fix the crime that has done by children. However, not all children have the right to receive diversion. There are the requirements to be applied. Article 7 (2) Law Number 11 of 2012 of Juvenile Criminal Justice System, establish the requirements are under 7 years imprisonment, and not a repetition. The requirements are not reflecting the theory of justice. Children who are threatened by imprisonment over 7 years would not have the right to get diversion. Then, success rate for implementation of diversion is low, it caused by law enforcer can not establish good communication among the parties. In addition, the implementation of diversion is taken place at the police station has contributed as factors of failure of the diversion. Framework in this study is the diversion has become the rights of every child in Juvenile Criminal Justice System, and definition of the diversion should be able to create a paradigm of restorative justice approach in the juvenile criminal justice system. The research method u in this study used doctrinal research method or normative research that study baout law which is drafted and developed by the basis of the doctrine. Based on the study that has been done, the application of diversion based on Law No, 11 of 2012 of Juvenile Criminal Justice System Children is unable to reflect the values of justice, it caused by the requirements, where the approach of restorative justice reflects the principle of justice, as intended by Aristotle in the theory of distributive justice and corrective justice. The conclusion of this research are: First, the protection of children in accommodated in the Law No. 11/2012 of Juvenile Criminal Justice System, but the concepts could not provide the protection in a holistic manner. Secondly, these obstacles (in implementation of diversion) because of culture (retibutive), although the juvenile criminal justice system has adobted teh restorative approach. Third, reconstruction of diversion must be built by the constructing diversion concept paradigm, so every child without exception has the rights to get diversion. Keyword: Divertion Concept, Child Protection, Juvenile Cryminal Justice System