Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

ANALISIS KUALITAS PELAYANAN PUBLIK DI KANTOR KECAMATAN SIMPANG EMPAT KABUPATEN BANJAR tamliha harun
AS-SIYASAH: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik Vol 7, No 1 (2022): : (Mei) AS SIYASAH - Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik
Publisher : UPT Publikasi Dan Pengelolaan Jurnal Universitas Islam Kalimantan MAB Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31602/as.v7i1.5529

Abstract

Untuk menyelenggarakan pelayanan publik maka diangkat dan ditetapkanlah  pelaksana pelayanan publik.  Pelaksana pelayanan publik adalah pejabat, pegawai, petugas, dan setiap orang yang bekerja  di dalam organisasi  penyelenggara yang bertugas melaksanakan tindakan atau serangkaian tindakan pelayanan publik. Pelayanan publik ditujukan kepada masyarakat, yaitu seluruh pihak, baik warga negara maupun penduduk sebagai orang perseorangan, kelompok, maupun badan hukum yang berkedudukan  sebagai penerima manfaat pelayanan publik, baik secara langsung maupun tidak langsung.
UPAYA PENAGGULANGAN GELANDANGAN DAN PENGEMIS DI KECAMATAN MARTAPURA KOTA KABUPATEN BANJAR (Perda Kabupaten Banjar Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Penanggulangan Gelandangan dan Pengemis) tamliha harun
AS-SIYASAH: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik Vol 3, No 2 (2018): (Nopember) AS SIYASAH - Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik
Publisher : UPT Publikasi Dan Pengelolaan Jurnal Universitas Islam Kalimantan MAB Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (145.798 KB) | DOI: 10.31602/as.v3i2.2086

Abstract

This research was conducted with the aim to find out more about the efforts made by the Banjar Regency Government in tackling the problem of homelessness and beggars in Martapura Kota District, Banjar Regency. It is expected that the results of this study can provide input for the Banjar Regency Government in an effort to maximize the sprawl response in the region. This research is a descriptive study, with data collection techniques: interviews, observation, and documentation, then the results are analyzed qualitatively. The results of this study indicate that: a. Sprawl in Banjar District (especially in Martapura Kota District) has been carried out through preventive efforts, repressive measures, and rehabilitation (rehabilitative) efforts based on Regional Regulation Number 2 of 2014 concerning Countermeasures for Homelessness and Beggars; b. These sprawl countermeasures are still not optimal, if referred to the regional regulation which covers them, especially rehabilitation efforts have not been carried out properly; c. The efforts of the sprawl control have not yet been maximized due to several obstacles, including the lack of apparatus (Social Service and Satpol PP), the lack of available budget allocations, and the unavailability of flat construction facilities and infrastructure as needed; d. Criminal sanctions and non-criminal sanctions in accordance with the Regional Regulation, cannot yet be applied firmly and consistently to sprites who have committed violations, as a result sanctions imposed on sprawl do not cause a deterrent effect.
MEKANISME IMPLEMENTASI SIDANG PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA INFORMASI PUBLIK (AJUDIKASI NON LITIGASI) DI KOMISI INFORMASI PROVINSI KALIMANTAN SELATAN Tamliha Harun
AS-SIYASAH: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik Vol 2, No 2 (2017): (Nopember) AS SIYASAH - Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik
Publisher : UPT Publikasi Dan Pengelolaan Jurnal Universitas Islam Kalimantan MAB Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (181.872 KB) | DOI: 10.31602/as.v2i2.1179

Abstract

The title of this research is: "Mechanism of Implementation of Public Information Dispute Settlement Session (Non-Litigation Adjudication) at Information Commission of South Kalimantan Province". This research was conducted with the intention to provide input to the Information Commission of South Kalimantan Province in an effort to improve its performance, especially in the implementation of public information dispute resolution session (non litigation adjudication). And also to inform the public, so all of them know and understand how the mechanism of public information dispute resolution session inInformation Commission. This research is a descriptive research, with its data collection techniques : interview, observation, and documentation, then analyzed qualitatively. The result of the research shows that : The mechanism of implementation of public information dispute resolution in Information Commission of South Kalimantan Province has been implemented in accordance with the provisions regulated by Undang-undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2008 About KIP and PERKI Nomor 1 Tahun 2013 About Public Information Dispute Procedure. In order for the implementation of public information dispute resolution hearing in the Information Commission to work better and professional, it is recommended that the commissioners need to follow the education/ non-litigation adjudication mediation training and secretariat follow the education/ training of registrant, and supported by representative facilities and infrastructure in the implementation of information dispute resolution session.
BEBERAPA KENDALA IMPLEMENTASI TUGAS DAN FUNGSI KOMISI INFORMASI PROVINSI KALIMANTAN SELATAN Tamliha Harun
AS-SIYASAH: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik Vol 1, No 1 (2016): (Nopember) AS SIYASAH - Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik
Publisher : UPT Publikasi Dan Pengelolaan Jurnal Universitas Islam Kalimantan MAB Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (353.182 KB) | DOI: 10.31602/as.v1i1.585

Abstract

The objective of this research is to find out how the constraints faced by the Information Committee of South Kalimantan Province in the implementation of tasks and functions. This type of research: descriptive, with data collection techniques: interviews, observation, and documentation. Average data analysis used is qualitative analysis. The results showed that: found some constraints / bottlenecks in the implementation of tasks and functions of the Information Committee of South Kalimantan, namely: a. Human resources: the commissioners, secretaries, and staff sekretarit still less than the maximum, b. The amount of the available budget is relatively small and highly bureaucratic management procedures. c. Infrastructure available is limited and does not conform to the standard requirements, and d. Lack of support from the government, both politically and budget, as well as the culture of permissiveness toward public disclosure.
IMPLEMENTASI PROGRAM INDONESIA PINTAR PADA SMPN 3 BANJARBARU KECAMATAN CEMPAKA KOTA BANJARBARU Tamliha Harun
AS-SIYASAH: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik Vol 6, No 1 (2021): (Mei) AS SIYASAH - Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik
Publisher : UPT Publikasi Dan Pengelolaan Jurnal Universitas Islam Kalimantan MAB Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31602/as.v6i1.3858

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to find out how the implementation of the Smart Indonesia Program (PIP) at SMPN 3 Banjarbaru, Cempaka Subdistrict, Banjarbaru City, is it in accordance with the Regulation of the Director General of Education of the Ministry of Education and Culture Number: 1881 / D / BP / 2019 concerning Guidelines for Implementing the Smart Indonesia Program at the Basic Education level. This research is a descriptive study, with data collection techniques interview, observation, and documentation, then the results are analyzed qualitatively. The results of this study indicate that: a. Implementation of the Smart Indonesia Program (PIH), through the Smart Indonesia Card (KIP) at SMPN 3 Banjarbaru has been running well and effectively, in accordance with applicable regulations; b. The number of students receiving assistance from the Smart Indonesia Program through the Smart Indonesia Card at SMPN 3 Banjarbaru was 228 students. However, there are some people who actually no longer meet the requirements, because the income of the parents / guardians of the students concerned has increased from before. KIP recipient students, the process of recapitulation, verification and input of student KIP recipient student data to Dapodik, until the disbursement and use of KIP funds by recipient students; d. The Smart Indonesia Program (PIH), through the Smart Indonesia Card (KIP) at SMPN 3 Banjarbaru, is very beneficial for students from poor or underprivileged families, so that the number of students dropping out of school can be reduced; e. However, there were still some students who received KIP or their guardians who did not understand the use of KIP funds, so they were used to finance expenses outside the context of their educational / school needs. 
PELAKSANAAN MEDIASI SENGKETA INFORMASI PUBLIK DI KOMISI INFORMASI PROVINSI KALIMANTAN SELATAN Tamliha Harun; Jumarianto Jumarianto
AS-SIYASAH : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik Vol 7, No 2 (2022): (November) AS SIYASAH - Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik
Publisher : UPT Publikasi Dan Pengelolaan Jurnal Universitas Islam Kalimantan MAB Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31602/as.v7i2.8962

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find out how the mechanism for implementing public information dispute mediation at the Information Commission of South Kalimantan Province, with the hope that public bodies as managers of public information and the public as users of public information know and understand the mechanism for resolving public information disputes through mediation at the Information Commission. This research uses descriptive-qualitative research, with interview, observation and documentation data collection techniques and then analyzed qualitatively. The research results can be described as follows; 1) The process of mediation activities at the Information Commission is an integral part of the process of non-litigation adjudication activities 2) Mediation activities are the first step in resolving public information disputes regarding open information caragories between the applicant and the respondent, guided by a mediator from the Information Commission Commissioner. 3) There are 3 (three) possible outcomes of mediation, namely successful mediation, failed mediation, and failed mediation. 4) If the mediation is successful (agreed), then the information dispute is considered completed. If mediation fails/fails, then the trial adjudication proceeds to the proof stage. 5) If the mediation is successful (agreed), then the results of the mediation are confirmed in the form of the Information Commission's Mediation Decision, and read out before the adjudication session. 6) The Information Commission mediation decision is legally binding on the parties, and must be implemented no later than 14 (fourteen) working days after the decision is read out.The purpose of this study is to find out how the mechanism for implementing public information dispute mediation at the Information Commission of South Kalimantan Province, with the hope that public bodies as managers of public information and the public as users of public information know and understand the mechanism for resolving public information disputes through mediation at the Information Commission. This research uses descriptive-qualitative research, with interview, observation and documentation data collection techniques and then analyzed qualitatively. The research results can be described as follows; 1) The process of mediation activities at the Information Commission is an integral part of the process of non-litigation adjudication activities 2) Mediation activities are the first step in resolving public information disputes regarding open information caragories between the applicant and the respondent, guided by a mediator from the Information Commission Commissioner. 3) There are 3 (three) possible outcomes of mediation, namely successful mediation, failed mediation, and failed mediation. 4) If the mediation is successful (agreed), then the information dispute is considered completed. If mediation fails/fails, then the trial adjudication proceeds to the proof stage. 5) If the mediation is successful (agreed), then the results of the mediation are confirmed in the form of the Information Commission's Mediation Decision, and read out before the adjudication session. 6) The Information Commission mediation decision is legally binding on the parties, and must be implemented no later than 14 (fourteen) working days after the decision is read out.