Azka Abdi Amrurobbi
Universitas Gadjah Mada

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Discourse Analysis: Kinship Politics in the 2020 Regional Head Election Moch Edward Trias Pahlevi; Azka Abdi Amrurobbi; Muhammad Iqbal Khatami; Bambang Eka Cahya Widodo
Bestuurskunde: Journal of Governmental Studies Vol 1 No 1 (2021): Kinship Politics in the 2020 Regional Head Elections in Indonesia
Publisher : Ministry of Home Affairs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53013/bestuurskunde.1.1.29-40

Abstract

After the issuance of the Constitutional Court Decision No.33 / PUU-Xlll / 2015 as the cancellation of the ban on dynastic politics, a number of candidates from the incumbent's relatives advanced in the direct Pilkada and mushroomed up to the 2020 regional elections. The occurrence of kinship politics is not only seen in terms of regulation, but the rise of kinship politics is also due to problems in political parties in carrying out the political recruitment function. This study seeks to analyze the findings of the online media reported in Kompas and Tempo. This study uses qualitative methods and uses Nvivo 12 Plus in processing data. In this study, it is explained that the factors for the formation of dynastic politics from online media coverage of Kompas dominantly explains the recruitment of political parties which are less democratic, while Tempo online media dominantly explains that the supporting factors for the formation of kinship politics are party recruitment, family support, and weak legal rules. In addition, the impact of kinship politics from the analysis of Kompas online media reports is the creation of corrupt behaviour and damaging the bureaucratic order. Meanwhile, the impact of kinship politics from the analysis of Tempo online media is the decline in the quality of democracy and damage to the structure of the party. This type of research used in this research is qualitative research. The analysis used in this paper is descriptive analysis. Analysis was performed using the Nvivo 12 plus software.
Politik Jalanan: Fenomena Perilaku Politik Gerakan Pemuda Ka’bah Kota Yogyakarta di Pemilu Serentak 2019 Moch. Edward Trias Pahlevi; David Efendi; Azka Abdi Amrurobbi
JIIP: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan Vol 5, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Program Studi Sarjana (S1) Ilmu Pemerintahan, FISIP, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jiip.v5i2.8375

Abstract

Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh opini masyarakat yang menganggap bahwa Gerakan Pemuda Ka’bah (GPK) memiliki tendensi kelompok kekerasan dan kepentingan politik praktis, khususnya yang berafiliasi pada Partai Persatuan Pembangunan (PPP). Kehadiran kelompok ini disebut sebagai kelompok vigilante atau milisi yang dianggap oleh masyarakat sebagai kelompok kekerasan terutama di jalanan. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk melihat bagaimana manuver politik GPK selama momentum pemilu 2019 yang lalu. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian lapangan yang mengkaji tentang perilaku politik dan politik jalanan. Lokasi penelitian dilakukan di Kota Yogyakarta dengan mengunakan metode penelitian kualitatif, yang mengandalkan data-data primer dari para informan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa perilaku GPK dalam politik jalanan dan eksistensi simbol ternyata berkorelasi dengan kepentingan ekonomi mereka. Selain itu, munculnya GPK Khittah berdampak pada menurunnya suara pemilih PPP di Kota Yogyakarta. 
THE DEMOCRATIC DECLINE IN INDONESIA UNDER COVID-19 PANDEMIC Fairuz Arta Abhipraya; Moch Edward Trias Pahlevi; Azka Abdi Amrurobbi
JWP (Jurnal Wacana Politik) Vol 5, No 2 (2020): JWP (Jurnal Wacana Politik) Oktober
Publisher : Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24198/jwp.v5i1.28581

Abstract

The debate about the weakening of democracy in various countries in controlling the COVID-19 pandemic is currently rising. This article aims to describe how the Indonesian government has implemented various pandemic control policies based on the indicators of democracy from the Freedom House, which include transparency, freedom of opinion, human rights, and pluralism. This article uses a qualitative method with a descriptive analysis approach, while data collection uses a literature study focusing on various government efforts and responses from civil society regarding pandemic control. The research results reveal that the policy does not pay attention to the transparency of state budget allocations, including the appointment of goods supplier partners. Threats of doxing against those critical of pandemic control policies interfere with free speech. In the civil society realm, a pandemic’s fear raises the stigma that this virus is identical to the Chinese-ethnic group. This paper concludes that indications of weakening transparency, freedom of opinion, human rights in pandemic control policies, and community responses contrary to pluralism values potentially reduce the quality of democracy in Indonesia.