Endah Tri Anomsari
Politeknik STIA LAN Bandung

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Natapraja : Kajian Ilmu Administrasi Negara

PARTISIPASI MASYARAKAT DALAM PENGELOLAAN HUTAN BERSAMA MASYARAKAT (STUDI KASUS DI KECAMATAN KARANGGAYAM, KEBUMEN) Endah Tri Anomsari
NATAPRAJA Natapraja No.1 Vol. 1 2013
Publisher : Yogyakarta State University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (86 KB) | DOI: 10.21831/jnp.v1i1.3463

Abstract

This qualitative descriptive research aims to understand citizen participation in Community Based Forest Management (PHBM) case study in Karanggayam, Kebumen. Participation media consists of Lembaga Masyarakat Desa Hutan (LMDH), Communication Forum, Non-governmental organization, and others. Citizen participation in planning process is scarce in grass root level. Communication Forum is the media in which PHBM stakeholders can have deliberative dialogue but the forum is not implemented as expected. Meanwhile, people participate in PHBM implementation as they charge responsibility to manage and maintain forest safety. They also support the program by providing labors and cooperating with Perhutani such as making communal farm and making land rent contract. Citizen participation also includes sharing profit and benefits of PHBM. The obstacles of participation is ineffective stakeholders’ dialogue, dependent civil society, and Perhutani’s domination over other stakeholders. Keywords: citizen participation, PHBM.
PARTISIPASI MASYARAKAT DALAM PENGELOLAAN HUTAN BERSAMA MASYARAKAT Studi Kasus Di Kecamatan Karanggayam, Kebumen Endah Tri Anomsari
NATAPRAJA Natapraja No.1 Vol. 1 2013
Publisher : Yogyakarta State University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (232.279 KB) | DOI: 10.21831/jnp.v1i1.3443

Abstract

This qualitative descriptive research aims to understand citizen participation in Community Based Forest Management (PHBM) case study in Karanggayam, Kebumen. Participation media consists of Lembaga Masyarakat Desa Hutan (LMDH), Communication Forum, Non-governmental organization, and others. Citizen participation in planning process is scarce in grass root level. Communication Forum is the media in which PHBM stakeholders can have deliberative dialogue but the forum is not implemented as expected. Meanwhile, people participate in PHBM implementation as they charge responsibility to manage and maintain forest safety. They also support the program by providing labors and cooperating with Perhutani such as making communal farm and making land rent contract. Citizen participation also includes sharing profit and benefits of PHBM. The obstacles of participation is ineffective stakeholders‟ dialogue, dependent civil society, and Perhutani‟s domination over other stakeholders.Keywords: citizen participation, PHBM
PROGRAM PEMBANGUNAN PARTISIPATIF DAN DAMPAKNYA TERHADAP PEMBERDAYAAN MASYARAKAT Endah Tri Anomsari; Rodlial Ramdhan Tackbir Abubakar
NATAPRAJA Vol 7, No 1 (2019): Governance
Publisher : Yogyakarta State University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (346.203 KB) | DOI: 10.21831/jnp.v7i1.22157

Abstract

Since the Washington Consensus in the 1990s, participation has become a mainstream issue in development policy, including in Indonesia post-Political Reformation in 1998. The involvement of the community in development policy achieves moral and intellectual support so that not only national, the local-level policy also uses participatory approach as it is considered to be effective in empowering people. Using a descriptive-qualitative approach, this study is an analysis on how participation in the Development Innovation and Regional Empowerment Program (PIPPK) brings impacts to empowerment of Bandung communities. According to data gathered in Bandung, participation cannot bring empowerment instantly. PIPPK has encouraged empowerment in terms of capability expansion, but it has not brought changes in opportunity structure. There are two main factors which leads to the results, those are: (1) that empowerment is complex, multidimensional, and continuous so that it is challenging to explore to what extent empowerment has progressed and (2) that the participation of people in PIPPK is restricted to the program implementation and not yet reflect the citizen power.Keyword: development, empowerment, community participation, participatory approach