Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Jurnal Hukum Kaidah: Media Komunikasi dan Informasi Hukum dan Masyarakat
Panca Sarjana Putra
Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara, Medan
Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
PEMIDANAAN TERHADAP ANAK YANG BERHADAPAN DENGAN HUKUM Muhammad Ridwan Lubis; Panca Sarjana Putra
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol 4, No 1 (2021): MEI
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v4i1.3354

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis bagaimana perlindungan hukum terhadap anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum dan menjawa apa yang menjadi faktor  utama anak konflik dengan hukum dan bagaimana peran penegak hukum dalam penanggulangan kasus-kasus terhadap anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum. Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian hukum yuridis normatif. Tidak diragukan lagi, reintegrasi anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum adalah salah satunya hak-hak penting anak karena jika anak bertentangan dengan hukum tidak memiliki hak dan perawatan khusus sehingga tidak dapat berguna dalam masyarakat. Oleh karena itu, anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum membutuhkan perlindungan hukum dan dukungan masyarakat untuk melindungi mereka secara terpisah dari orang dewasa, karena mereka situasi, kapasitas fisik dan intelektual yang terbatas. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan faktor-faktor yang menjadi penyebab anak yang terlibat dalam kejahatan adalah keluarga faktor, faktor lingkungan /pertemanan, ekonomi, tingkat pendidikannya rendah dan alkohol/obat-obatan. Penyebabnya faktor yang harus dikurangi dan dihilangkan agar anak-anak tidak terlibat dalam melakukan kejahatan. Langkah-langkah atau upaya konkrit dari semua instansi pelaksana yang terkait dengan upaya penanganan anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum telah dilakukan namun belum menunjukkan hasil yang signifikan dalam memberikan dukungan terhadap perlindungan hak-hak anak 
PERTAGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA MEMPERDAGANGKAN JARINGAN TUBUH MANUSIA MENURUT HUKUM POSITIF DI INDONESIA Panca Sarjana Putra
Jurnal Hukum Kaidah: Media Komunikasi dan Informasi Hukum dan Masyarakat Vol 22, No 3 (2023): Edisi Mei 2023
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30743/jhk.v22i3.6927

Abstract

The perpetrators of the crime of trafficking in human organs are not only carried out by criminal syndicates who want to get money by illegal means, but the perpetrators can also be the people themselves who sell their organs with the intent and purpose of getting money. Regulations regarding the criminal act of trading in organs/body tissues in the Criminal Code do not clearly prohibit acts of trading in human organs, as well as in Law Number 21 of 2007 concerning the Eradication of Trafficking in Persons which includes trading in organs into acts of exploitation of people while in the Law -Law Number 36 of 2009 concerning Health has clearly regulated that human organs are prohibited from being traded under any circumstances. Article 192 of Law Number 36 of 2009 stipulates that every person who deliberately trades organs or body tissue under any pretext as referred to in Article 64 paragraph (3) is subject to criminal sanctions. with a maximum imprisonment of 10 years and a maximum fine of IDR 1 billion. Keywords: Criminal Acts, Trading, Body Organs
Impact of Criminal Code’s Articles 263 & 264: A Critical Look at Press Freedom and Human Rights Efren Nova; Zico Junius Fernando; Panca Sarjana Putra; Agusalim Agusalim
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 24, No 2 (2024): July Edition
Publisher : Law and Human Rights Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law and Human Rights of The Repub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2024.V24.133-146

Abstract

The public, human rights advocates, and media practitioners have engagedin significant debate regarding Articles 263 and 264 of the new CriminalCode (KUHP). These articles establish laws that criminalize spreadingfalse news that could cause social unrest. The punishments for spreadingsuch information vary depending on the severity and intention behind itsdissemination. Articles 263(1) and (2) differentiate between intentionallyspreading false information that the perpetrator knows is untrue andspreading information that is reasonably believed to be false. The punishmentfor this offense can be imprisonment for up to six years or a maximumfine of category V. Article 264 specifically addresses the act of spreadingfalse information that the perpetrator knows is untrue. Meanwhile, Article264 specifically addresses the act of spreading ambiguous, exaggerated,or incomplete news. Those found guilty can face a maximum penalty oftwo years in prison or a category III fine. This study utilizes normativelegal methodologies, which include statutory, conceptual, comparative,and futuristic approaches. The research design is characterized by bothdescriptive and prescriptive elements. Content analysis was conductedto evaluate the collected data. The study’s findings illustrate that theprimary objective of Articles 263 and 264 of the new Criminal Code is tomaintain public order and deter riots that may arise as a consequence of thedissemination of incorrect information. Nevertheless, these provisions havebeen criticized for their potential to be used as a means to suppress pressfreedom and limit public expression, both of which are fundamental aspectsof democracy and the protection of human rights. Concerns have beenraised about the potential impact of the implementation of these articles onthe protection of press freedom as guaranteed by the Press Law.
Co-Authors Agusalim Agusalim Efren Nova Muhammad Ridwan Lubis Zico Junius Fernando