Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Bahasa Lingua Scientia Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengabdian Masyarakat
Fatchul Mu'in
Unknown Affiliation
Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
TYPES OF FEEDBACK USED BY THE STUDENTS IN INTERMEDIATE WRITING CLASS Hendra Alamsyah; Rina Listia; Fatchul Mu'in
Jurnal Bahasa Lingua Scientia Vol 13 No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Pusat Pengembangan Bahasa IAIN Tulungagung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21274/ls.2021.13.1.%p

Abstract

Writing is the most complicated skill among other language skills. In the writing activity, the students have to invent ideas and organize them into sentences and paragraphs that will be clear for readers. Feedback is crucial to give significant improvement to student's writings. Peers and maybe various can provide feedback. This study's objective was to describe the types of feedback used by students of the Intermediate Writing Class in writing an argumentative paragraph. Descriptive qualitative was the design of research. The subjects of this research are A1 and A4 Intermediate Writing course students of the English language Education Study Program of Lambung Mangkurat University. The data were collected through observation and document analysis. The data were then analyzed through three steps: familiarizing and organizing, coding, and interpreting and representing. The result was found that the students used several feedback types, namely written feedback as responding and written feedback as correcting. Written feedback as correcting used by the students consists of direct feedback, metalinguistic feedback, and unfocused feedback. From some of the metalinguistic feedback that some students used, they were using the grammatical description. Some of the metalinguistic feedback that some students used was the metalinguistic explanation (grammatical description). There was no metalinguistic feedback of the error code. There was only one student who used unfocused feedback. In conclusion, the students used four feedback types: written feedback as responding, written feedback as correcting, or written corrective feedback consisting of direct feedback, metalinguistic feedback, and unfocused feedback. Written feedback as responding is the feedback that the students used most while doing peer feedback. The students need to look for more information and explanation or feedback from the teachers and their friends and give feedback while doing peer feedback properly to not only use one type of feedback.
TYPES OF FEEDBACK USED BY THE STUDENTS IN INTERMEDIATE WRITING CLASS Hendra Alamsyah; Rina Listia; Fatchul Mu'in
Jurnal Bahasa Lingua Scientia Vol 13 No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Unit Pengembangan Bahasa UIN Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21274/ls.2021.13.1.103-123

Abstract

Writing is the most complicated skill among other language skills. In the writing activity, the students have to invent ideas and organize them into sentences and paragraphs that will be clear for readers. Feedback is crucial to give significant improvement to student's writings. Peers and maybe various can provide feedback. This study's objective was to describe the types of feedback used by students of the Intermediate Writing Class in writing an argumentative paragraph. Descriptive qualitative was the design of research. The subjects of this research are A1 and A4 Intermediate Writing course students of the English language Education Study Program of Lambung Mangkurat University. The data were collected through observation and document analysis. The data were then analyzed through three steps: familiarizing and organizing, coding, and interpreting and representing. The result was found that the students used several feedback types, namely written feedback as responding and written feedback as correcting. Written feedback as correcting used by the students consists of direct feedback, metalinguistic feedback, and unfocused feedback. From some of the metalinguistic feedback that some students used, they were using the grammatical description. Some of the metalinguistic feedback that some students used was the metalinguistic explanation (grammatical description). There was no metalinguistic feedback of the error code. There was only one student who used unfocused feedback. In conclusion, the students used four feedback types: written feedback as responding, written feedback as correcting, or written corrective feedback consisting of direct feedback, metalinguistic feedback, and unfocused feedback. Written feedback as responding is the feedback that the students used most while doing peer feedback. The students need to look for more information and explanation or feedback from the teachers and their friends and give feedback while doing peer feedback properly to not only use one type of feedback.
PELATIHAN MASSIVE ONLINE OPEN COURSE (MOOC) BERBASIS QUIZIZZ MEMBACA TEKS UNTUK MGMP BAHASA INDONESIA SMPN KOTA BANJARMASIN Rusma Noortyani; Fatchul Mu'in; Noor Cahaya; Nuruddin Wiranda; Uswatun Hasanah; Jarkani; Delfisea Cahya
Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 6 No. 3 (2023): Agustus
Publisher : FKIP Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jppm.v6i3.5555

Abstract

Mitra kegiatan PKM ini adalah untuk MGMP bahasa Indonesia SMPN kota Banjarmasin. Guru-guru bahasa Indonesia tingkat SMPN kota Banjarmasin diberikan pelatihan pembuatan Massive Online Open Course (MOOC) dengan menggunakan Google Classroom dan media kuisnya menggunakan kuis interaktif online dari Quizizz. Dengan melakukan kegiatan PKM ini, tujuan khusus yang dicapai adalah guru menjadi lebih mampu menggunakan teknologi untuk melaksanakan dan menilai pembelajaran daring. Diharapkan peserta PKM ini dapat menambah wawasan dan inspirasi kepada guru lain dari latar belakang pendidikan yang berbeda di sekolah atau dalam kegiatan MGMP untuk masing-masing kelompok guru mata pelajaran. Diharapkan bahwa kegiatan PKM ini akan memberikan dukungan yang menyeluruh dalam langkah-langkah berikut: 1) Pertemuan awal dengan guru mitra untuk membahas pentingnya teknologi informasi dalam pembelajaran dan penilaian pembelajaran; 2) Pelatihan intensif soal kuis/ujian dan penerapan soal kuis/ujian dalam kuis interaktif online Quizizz; 3) Focus Group Discussion (FGD) tentang media kuis interaktif online Quizizz yang dikembangkan; dan 4) Simulasi kuis interaktif online Quizizz, 5) Evaluasi hasil operasi.
Co-Authors Delfisea Cahya Hendra Alamsyah Jarkani Noor Cahaya Nuruddin Wiranda Rina Listia Rusma Noortyani USWATUN HASANAH