Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmiah WUNY DIJB (Diponegoro International Journal of Business) Journal of Management and Entrepreneurship Research
Pratama, Mahendra Ryansa Gallen Gagah
Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
How Do Banks Determine Their Capital Buffer? Evidence from Indonesian Bank Mahendra Ryansa Gallen Gagah Pratama; Tyas Effendi; Lina Nur Hidayati; Alfonso Mendoza-Velázquez
Journal of Management and Entrepreneurship Research Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Nahdlatul Ulama Jepara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34001/jmer.2021.6.02.1-13

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to investigate how banks determine their capital buffer. Return on Equity (ROE), Non-Performing Loans (NPL), Capital Buffer Lag (BUFFt-1), Loan to Total Assets (LOTA), and Income Diversification (IDIV) are some of the variables examined in this study. Research Design & Methods: Purposive sampling was used to collect samples for this study. It was 20 of the 42 conventional commercial banks that were listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2012-2016. In this study, multiple regression analysis was used, as well as the ordinary and two-stage least squares methods. Findings: The results of this study have shown that the capital buffer has a negative impact on return on equality (ROE) and income diversification (IDIV). The capital buffer was affected by Lag of Capital Buffer. This research examines how a bank can make a profit from the negative impact of ROE. Based on the results of the tests, the Indonesian Bank has not pursued the highest possible capital buffer. Implications & Recommendations: Companies will use their profit to further profitable activities when they fulfill a minimum capital buffer requirement. Contribution & Value Added: The results of this study try to give an idea for the management of capital and capital buffers and to determine the ideal strategy for investors and banks to meet the Basel and Government regulation. This research tries to add insight into the internal factors that determine capital buffers at conventional commercial banks in Indonesia, as well as research references in the field of financial management, particularly capital buffers.
The determinants of murabaha margin income in Islamic banking companies in Indonesia Musaroh Musaroh; Naning Margasari; Nindya Nuriswati Laili; Mahendra Ryansa Gallen Gagah Pratama
Diponegoro International Journal of Business Vol 3, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Department of Management | Faculty of Economics and Business | Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/dijb.3.2.2020.123-130

Abstract

This research was conducted to examine the effect of the operational costs, third-party funds, murabaha financing volume, Bank Indonesia’s interest rate and inflation on murabaha margin income at Islamic commercial banks in Indonesia. The period used in this research is 3 years, from 2016 to 2018. This study's population were 14 Islamic commercial banks that have been and are still registered with the Financial Services Authority from 2016 to 2018. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling and obtained a sample of 9 Islamic commercial banks. The data analysis technique used is multiple linear regression. Before conducting the multiple linear regression analysis, a classic assumption test was carried out to ensure that the model did not have normality, heteroscedasticity, autocorrelation, and multicollinearity. The results show that partially operational costs have a positive and significant effect on murabaha margin income, third-party funds have a negative and significant effect on murabaha margin income, murabaha financing volume has a positive and significant effect on murabaha margin income, while the Bank Indonesia’s interest rate and inflation do not influence on Murabaha margin income.   
DETERMINANTS OF COMPANY STOCK SPLIT DECISIONS (STUDY ON GO PUBLIC COMPANIES LISTED ON THE BEI) Mahendra Ryansa Gallen Gagah Pratama; Nadia Rachma Puspita; Yeni Nur Prilanita
Jurnal Ilmiah WUNY Vol 5, No 1 (2023): Jurnal Ilmiah WUNY
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21831/jwuny.v5i1.59727

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of the high level of stock prices, company financial performance, and stock trading liquidity on stock split decisions in companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. It uses a quantitative approach. The research population includes all companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in the 2014-2016 period. The sample was determined by purposive sampling technique and 40 companies were obtained. The analytical method used in this study is logistic regression analysis.Based on research results, it can be concluded that the level of overpriced stock prices by proxy Price Earning Ratio (PER) has a significant positive effect on the company's stock split decision. The level of expensive stock prices proxied by Price Book Value (PBV) has a significant positive effect on the company's stock split decision. The company's financial performance by proxy Earnings Per Share (EPS) has a significant positive influence on the company's stock split decision. The company's financial performance proxied by Return on Assets (ROA) has a significant negative effect on the company's stock split decision. Stock trading liquidity proxied by Trading Volume Activity (TVA) has a significant negative effect on the company's stock split decision. The Nagelkerke R Square value in this study is 0. 702 which means the ability of the variable level of expensive stock prices, the company's financial performance, and stock trading liquidity explains the company's decision variable to do a stock split of 70.2%. The remaining 29.8% of the dependent variable is explained by other factors outside the model.
Co-Authors Alfonso Mendoza-Velázquez Laili, Nindya Nuriswati Lina Nur Hidayati Musaroh, Musaroh Nadia Rachma Puspita Naning Margasari Tyas Effendi Yeni Nur Prilanita