Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

KEBIJAKAN INTEGRAL DALAM MENCEGAH DAN MENANGGULANGI TINDAK PIDANA PENAMBANGAN TANPA IZIN DI INDONESIA Ade Adhari
Bina Hukum Lingkungan Vol 2, No 1 (2017): Bina Hukum Lingkungan
Publisher : Pembina Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia (PHLI)

Penambangan Tanpa Izin (PETI) merupakan salah satu jenis tindak pidana yang marak terjadi, mengancam keseimbangan, stabilitas dan produktifitas lingkungan hidup. Dengan perkataan lain, tindak pidana tersebut mendatangkan bahaya bagi lingkungan hidup beserta unsur-unsur di dalamnya (ruang, benda, daya, keadaan, dan makluk hidup). Hal ini dikarenakan, karakteristik PETI antara lain tidak mematuhi good mining practice sehingga menimbulkan ekses seperti pencemaran lingkungan, pencemaran air dengan merkuri, tidak dilakukan reklamasi setelah pasca tambang, dan lain sebagainya. Mempertimbangkan hal tersebut, dan sejalan dengan konsensus global penanggulangan PETI harus ditembuh melalui kebijakan integratif yang memadukan antara kebijakan non-penal dan penal. Kebijakan non-penal berorientasi mengatasi sebab-sebab munculnya (eliminating the causes) PETI, antara lain melalui reformasi kesadaran hukum, penciptaan lapangan pekerjaan dan meningkatkan keterampilan masyarakat, dan meningkatkan fungsi pengawasan pemerintah. Hal ini diharapkan dapat mencegah terjadinya tindakan penambangan secara melawan hukum tersebut. Sementara itu, kebijakan penal dilakukan dengan berorientasi pada usaha menanggulangi PETI yang lebih bersifat represif dengan mengandalkan sanksi pidana sebagai sarananya. Pada akhirnya, PETI bukan hanya dapat ditanggulangi melainkan dapat dicegah.Kata Kunci: PETI, Kebijakan Integral, Kebijakan Kriminal

Kepastian Hukum Penerapan Kriteria Kewenangan Penyidikan Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi oleh Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Republik Indonesia Lambertus Josua Tallaut; Ade Adhari
Jurnal Analisis Hukum Vol 5 No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Nasional

Corruption crimes at the investigation stage, the authority is owned by the Prosecutor's Office, the Police, and the KPK. The authority of the KPK is regulated in Article 11 of the KPK Law. However, in practice, the Prosecutor's Office investigates corruption cases that fall under the authority of the KPK, which results in legal uncertainty. The purpose of this research is to understand the essence of legal certainty, and its application is related to the authority to investigate the KPK normatively, as well as to be investigated by the Attorney General's Office. The type of research used is juridical-empirical, the research approach is the law approach and the case approach. Certainty is a legal value that underlies the birth of legal principles and norms, therefore it must be upheld because the consequences are goals rather than law. The prosecutor's action in investigating the corruption case is the authority of the KPK to create legal uncertainty, which means it violates the value of legal certainty. The prosecutor's reasoning that Article 11 is just a norm is clearly not true, because Article 11 is part of a strategic criminal law formulation policy and also the case investigated by the Prosecutor's Office caused problems because it did not file an appeal against the decision of PT DKI Jakarta which was considered to have violated the sense of justice. Prosecutors' actions violate the value of legal certainty, injure the characteristics of the rule of law and injure the strategic city of criminal law policies at the formulation stage.

Kepastian Hukum Ketentuan Pelaku Utama Dalam Kriteria Justice Collaborator di Indonesia Amelia Elisabeth Putri Kusuma; Ade Adhari
Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021): Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law
Publisher : ILIN Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

The purpose of this research is to analyze and understand the application of main suspect of justice collaborator criteria in Indonesia. This research is a normative law research, namely law research conducted by examining legal books, legal journals and other library materials as well as the secondary data related to justice collaborator. The result of this research is the legal certainty regarding the main suspect of the justice collaborator criteria that has not been fulfilled by the Indonesian Law, so it has the potential to harm the law enforcement process. This is due to lack of understanding of the main suspect of justice collaborator among the law enforcers. Therefore, the intervention of the authorities to improve the current legal system is required in order to achieve the legal objectives. Specifically, justice, expediency, and legal certainty especially regarding the justice collaborator. The Government needs to accommodate this policy in a clear, vivid, and complete rules. Starting from the criteria and the condition, implementation of procedures, the reward, and the protection for the justice collaborator himself.

MASALAH YURIDIS TIDAK DITETAPKANNYA KUALIFIKASI DELIK DALAM KETENTUAN PIDANA PADA UNDANG-UNDANG YANG DISAHKAN DALAM KURUN WAKTU 2015-2019 Ade Adhari; Anis Widyawati; Fajar Dian Aryani; Musmuliadin Musmuliadin
Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, dan Seni Vol 5, No 1 (2021): Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, dan Seni
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/jmishumsen.v5i1.11167.2021

In the 2015-2019 period, there were 20 (twenty) ratifications and promulgations of laws in which there were policies for the formulation of criminal provisions. Chapter Criminal Provisions in various laws have a strategic position so that criminal law norms can be operational properly at the level of application and execution of crimes. However, at the in abstracto level, the formulation of criminal provisions in these various laws contains juridical problems. The research method used to answer these problems is doctrinal research by conceptualizing law is statutory regulation. There is a criminal law issued in the 2015-2019 period which is the object of study. The results showed that the juridical problems found were, among others, 19 laws that did not stipulate juridical qualifications in the form of crimes or violations. The distinction between crimes and violations has a juridical consequence in the form of differentiating penalties for crimes and violations in Book I of the Criminal Code. The absence of a determination of this juridical qualification means that the general provisions in Book I of the Criminal Code Chapter I-XVIII cannot be enforced. Therefore, it is necessary to reform the criminal law towards the formulation policy by improving the formulation of criminal law norms which contain juridical issues in these various laws. Dalam kurun waktu 2015-2019 terdapat 20 (dua puluh) pengesahan dan pengundangan undang-undang yang didalamnya terdapat kebijakan formulasi ketentuan pidana. Bab Ketentuan Pidana dalam berbagai undang-undang memiliki posisi yang strategis agar norma hukum pidana dapat operasional dengan baik pada tataran aplikasi dan eksekusi pidana. Namun dalam tataran in abstracto, formulasi ketentuan pidana dalam berbagai undang-undang tersebut mengandung masalah yuridis. Metode penelitian yang digunakan untuk menjawab permasalahan tersebut adalah penelitian doktrinal dengan mengkonsepsikan hukum adalah peraturan perundang-undangan. Terdapat undang-undang pidana yang terbit pada periode 2015-2019 yang menjadi objek kajian. Hasil penelitian menunjukan masalah yuridis yang ditemukan antara lain terdapat 19 undang-undang yang tidak menetapkan kualifikasi yuridis berupa kejahatan atau pelanggaran. Pembedaan kejahatan dan pelanggaran mengandung konsekuensi yuridis berupa adanya pembedaan aturan pemidanaan bagi kejahatan dan pelanggaran yang ada dalam Buku I KUHP. Tidak adanya penetapan kualifikasi yuridis ini menyebabkan ketentuan umum dalam Buku I KUHP Bab I-XVIII tidak dapat diberlakukan. Oleh sebab itu diperlukan pembaharuan hukum pidana terhadap kebijakan formulasi tersebut dengan memperbaiki perumusan norma hukum pidana yang memuat masalah yuridis dalam berbagai undang-undang tersebut.

PENERAPAN PASAL 28 AYAT (2) UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 19 TAHUN 2016 TENTANG INFORMASI DAN TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK DALAM MENANGGULANGI DELIK UJARAN KEBENCIAN DI INTERNET Windisen Windisen; Ade Adhari
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 6, No 1 (2022): Maret
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v6i1.4292

Hate speech is an act that is prohibited by law, with the development of technology, information and communication, hate speech is also found on the internet. Regulations regarding hate speech offenses on the internet in Indonesia are formulated in Article 28 paragraph (2) of Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions as amended by Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions (UU ITE). However, in its application, Article 28 paragraph (2) of the ITE Law is considered problematic and does not provide legal certainty. Therefore, the problem formulated, namely "How from Article 28 paragraph (2) of the ITE Law in Overcoming Hate Speech Offenses on the Internet". The method used is empirical juridical which is a type of sociological legal research and can be mentioned by field research, which examines the applicable legal provisions and what has occurred in people's lives. The results of this study are the application of Article 28 paragraph (2) of the ITE Law referring to the SKB of the ITE Law which this article is intended for the act of spreading information that causes hatred based on SARA, but does not include a submission of opinions that contains criticism or disagrees, if the perpetrator found guilty will be subject to criminal sanctions in the form of imprisonment and fines.

PENYELESAIAN HUKUM TERHADAP KASUS SUDAN SELATAN Zavira Aulia; Ester Daniela A Siregar; Levina Cerelia; Ade Adhari
PROSIDING SERINA Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021): PROSIDING SERINA III 2021
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Universitas Tarumanagara

South Sudan is now officially the Republic of South Sudan and has become a country in East Africa. However, after secession, South Sudan's condition was not better, in fact South Sudan was again trapped in internal and external conflicts. Such as the occurrence of rebellions or inter-ethnic conflicts. The current crisis in South Sudan, if we look at its history, is a problem that has occurred since the founding of the Sudan People's Liberation Movement (SPLM). Although there are differences in the SPLM which are basically tactical and ideological in nature, the disputes that occur between the two factions lead to different identities of its members, namely nuer versus dinka. This was triggered by the political rivalry between the two. As a new country, South Sudan must be faced with the problems of civil conflict that has been going on since 2013 which has had an impact on the country such as the economy, human rights violations, and hunger. This causes investors to suffer huge losses. Thus, on the basis of interests and to realize world peace, a number of countries and international institutions are present to help facilitate the resolution of the conflict that occurred in South Sudan. In this writing, the author uses a normative research method with a descriptive research nature. The purpose of this paper is to find out the legal remedies that have been taken by third parties in resolving the South Sudan conflict and to understand the reasons for the importance of third parties in the South Sudan conflict. Sudan Selatan kini secara resmi bernama Republik Sudan Selatan dan telah menjadi sebuah negara di Afrika Timur. Namun setelah memisahkan diri, kondisi Sudan Selatan justru tidak lebih baik, justru Sudan Selatan kembali terjebak dalam konflik internal maupun eksternal. Seperti masih terjadinya pemberontakan ataupun konflik antar etnis. Krisis yang terjadi di Sudan Selatan saat ini, jika kita lihat dari sejarahnya, merupakan permasalahan yang terjadi sejak berdirinya gerakan Sudan People’s Liberation Movement (SPLM). Meskipun terdapat perbedaan dalam SPLM pada dasarnya bersifat taktis dan ideologis, namun perselisihan yang terjadi antara dua faksi tersebut membawa pada identitas anggotanya yang berbeda yaitu nuer melawan dinka. Hal tersebut dipicu oleh persaingan politik antar keduanya. Sebagai negara yang baru, Sudan Selatan harus dihadapkan dengan permasalahan konflik sipil yang berlangsung sejak tahun 2013 yang memberikan dampak kepada negara tersebut seperti perekonomian, pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM), dan kelaparan. Sehingga mengakibatkan negara-negara investor mengalami kerugian yang besar. Dengan demikian, atas dasar kepentingan-kepentingan dan untuk mewujudkan perdamaian dunia, maka sejumlah negara dan lembaga-lembaga internasional hadir untuk membantu memfasilitasi penyelesaian daripada konflik yang terjadi di Sudan Selatan. Dalam penulisan ini, penulis menggunakan metode penelitian normatif dengan sifat penelitian deskriptif. Adapun tujuan dari penulisan ini untuk mengetahui upaya hukum yang telah dilakukan oleh pihak ketiga dalam penyelesaian konflik Sudan Selatan serta memahami alasan pentingnya pihak ketiga dalam konflik Sudan Selatan.

KEBIJAKAN INTEGRAL DALAM MENCEGAH DAN MENANGGULANGI TINDAK PIDANA PENAMBANGAN TANPA IZIN DI INDONESIA Ade Adhari
Bina Hukum Lingkungan Vol 2, No 1 (2017): Bina Hukum Lingkungan
Publisher : Pembina Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia (PHLI)

Penambangan Tanpa Izin (PETI) merupakan salah satu jenis tindak pidana yang marak terjadi, mengancam keseimbangan, stabilitas dan produktifitas lingkungan hidup. Dengan perkataan lain, tindak pidana tersebut mendatangkan bahaya bagi lingkungan hidup beserta unsur-unsur di dalamnya (ruang, benda, daya, keadaan, dan makluk hidup). Hal ini dikarenakan, karakteristik PETI antara lain tidak mematuhi good mining practice sehingga menimbulkan ekses seperti pencemaran lingkungan, pencemaran air dengan merkuri, tidak dilakukan reklamasi setelah pasca tambang, dan lain sebagainya. Mempertimbangkan hal tersebut, dan sejalan dengan konsensus global penanggulangan PETI harus ditembuh melalui kebijakan integratif yang memadukan antara kebijakan non-penal dan penal. Kebijakan non-penal berorientasi mengatasi sebab-sebab munculnya (eliminating the causes) PETI, antara lain melalui reformasi kesadaran hukum, penciptaan lapangan pekerjaan dan meningkatkan keterampilan masyarakat, dan meningkatkan fungsi pengawasan pemerintah. Hal ini diharapkan dapat mencegah terjadinya tindakan penambangan secara melawan hukum tersebut. Sementara itu, kebijakan penal dilakukan dengan berorientasi pada usaha menanggulangi PETI yang lebih bersifat represif dengan mengandalkan sanksi pidana sebagai sarananya. Pada akhirnya, PETI bukan hanya dapat ditanggulangi melainkan dapat dicegah.Kata Kunci: PETI, Kebijakan Integral, Kebijakan Kriminal

Kepastian Hukum Penerapan Kriteria Kewenangan Penyidikan Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi oleh Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Republik Indonesia Lambertus Josua Tallaut; Ade Adhari
Jurnal Analisis Hukum Vol 5 No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Nasional

Corruption crimes at the investigation stage, the authority is owned by the Prosecutor's Office, the Police, and the KPK. The authority of the KPK is regulated in Article 11 of the KPK Law. However, in practice, the Prosecutor's Office investigates corruption cases that fall under the authority of the KPK, which results in legal uncertainty. The purpose of this research is to understand the essence of legal certainty, and its application is related to the authority to investigate the KPK normatively, as well as to be investigated by the Attorney General's Office. The type of research used is juridical-empirical, the research approach is the law approach and the case approach. Certainty is a legal value that underlies the birth of legal principles and norms, therefore it must be upheld because the consequences are goals rather than law. The prosecutor's action in investigating the corruption case is the authority of the KPK to create legal uncertainty, which means it violates the value of legal certainty. The prosecutor's reasoning that Article 11 is just a norm is clearly not true, because Article 11 is part of a strategic criminal law formulation policy and also the case investigated by the Prosecutor's Office caused problems because it did not file an appeal against the decision of PT DKI Jakarta which was considered to have violated the sense of justice. Prosecutors' actions violate the value of legal certainty, injure the characteristics of the rule of law and injure the strategic city of criminal law policies at the formulation stage.

Analysis Of The Formulation Of Criminal Provisions In Law Number 12 Of 2012 Concerning Higher Education Ade Adhari; Imelda Martinelli; Indah Siti Amelia; Leony Sondang
Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Vol 23, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.jdh.2023.23.2.3654

The criminal determination legislation policy in Law no. 12 of 2012 concerning Higher Education is a part of the stages of crime prevention in the field of higher education which is expected to be able to provide clear directions for law enforcement officials at the application and execution stages of a crime by providing complete sentencing rules. However, it turns out that the criminal provisions in the law are only an incomplete or partial set of tools in the context of tackling criminal acts in the field of higher education. This can be seen from the many juridical problems in the law, including the absence of juridical qualifications, corporate criminal responsibility issues and so on. For this reason, in the future it is necessary to update the existing criminal provisions formulation policy in the Higher Education Law.Keywords: Criminal Law Policy; Formulation; Juridical Issues

Title

Found 9 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 9 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 9 Documents
Search