Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

WALI DALAM MISTIK ISLAM MENURUT REYNOLD A. NICHOLSON Agus Himmawan Utomo
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 22, No 2 (2012)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.12993

Abstract

In Islamic tradition most people are known as ‘wali’ when they have miracle (karamah), such as healing people from blindness, transforming anything to another thing, etc.. Those karamah got muslims respect to the walis. Many cases show that they have privileges and permissions to behave or act which is different from common people. These privileges attract some persons to claim themselves as ‘wali’. The phenomena tends to position communities of one society in a destructive conflict because it is susceptible to manipulate the predicate of wali. According to Reynold A. Nicholson, the wali is everyone who is chosen by Allah. There is no boundaries of age, sex, race, or any other condition for the wali. Wali or aulia (plural) are chosen for their piety and ability to manage their desire, and because of their intimate relation to God, they had karamah. While Sufis are chosen from muslim community, aulia are chosen from the Sufis.
Status Ontologis Perempuan (Gugutan Riffat Hasan atas Konstruksi Teologis dari Konsep Gender) Agus Himmawan Utomo
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 13, No 3 (2003)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.31302

Abstract

The phenomena of gender inequalities such as subordination discrimination and violance upon women made up feminist to change the situation conscriously. Riffat Hasan, a moslem feminist, made the effort to reconstruct a minor theological understanding of women in Moslem world's which is supposed to be the roots of gender inequalities. Women aren't created only for completing the life of men as shown in some verses and hadits. Ontological-status of woman is not depend on what, when, and from where they were created
REDEFINING THE MEANING OF FREEDOM IN LIBERAL THEOLOGY AND LIBERATION THEOLOGY, AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION IN RELIGIOUS LIFE Nurul Huda; Arqom Kuswanjono; Agus Himmawan Utomo
Khazanah: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora Vol. 21 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : UIN Antasari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18592/khazanah.v21i1.8759

Abstract

The concept of freedom in historical settings is often regarded as the primary catalyst for the rise and fall of civilizations. In ancient Greece, freedom was deemed to have played a crucial role in propelling Greek civilization to its zenith. The dark ages of Europe were similarly perceived as a period of diminished freedom due to the dominance of the church. However, the emergence of the Renaissance and modern era marked a resurgence of freedom, reminiscent of the values prevalent during the ancient Greek period, characterized by secular principles. Religious values were considered incompatible with modernity. Nevertheless, in a religious society, the essence of freedom lies in the most fundamental realm, namely theology. This article aims to explore how freedom is evident in the attributes of God, the life of Jesus, and the Bible within the context of liberal and liberation theology. Both of these theological perspectives signify a profound shift in religious attitudes, moving away from dogmatism and excessive conformity to orthodoxy, towards a more critical and progressive outlook. Liberal and liberation theology present a responsive depiction of religion, advocating for and fighting alongside human freedom, thus ensuring that religion remains relevant and problem-solving. While liberal theology endeavors to vocalize freedom to bridge the gap between faith and modern sciences, liberation theology strives for human freedom from all forms of discrimination and marginalization. Despite their apparent similarities, they diverge in their interpretation of freedom, leading to distinctions in the practical realm and religious practices.
KONSEP KETUHANAN NON-KUALITAS DALAM BUDDHISME: SEBUAH ANTITESIS KONSEP TUHAN PERSONAL Galuh Nur Fattah; Agus Himmawan Utomo
Jurnal Agama Buddha dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Vol. 9 No. 1 (2023): Jurnal Agama Buddha dan Ilmu Pengetahuan
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Buddha Negeri Raden Wijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53565/abip.v9i1.719

Abstract

Buddhisme adalah sebuah agama dan sistem filsafat yang memberikan pijakan moral dan metodologi praksis bagi seseorang untuk merealisasikan pencerahan dan melenyapkan penderitaan. Namun sebagai agama, Buddhisme terkadang dipandang tidak layak, karena tidak memiliki konsepsi tentang Tuhan sebagai mana agama-agama dalam tradisi Abrahamik yang monoteisme. Pandangan yang menyatakan bahwa Buddhisme tidak layak disebut sebagai agama ini didasarkan pada paradigma agama dunia yang memang sangat dipengaruhi oleh tradisi Abrahamik. Banyak yang beranggapan bahwa Buddhisme itu bercorak ateistik, ada juga yang beranggapan bahwa Buddhisme itu politeistik, bahkan ada yang menganggapnya bukan bukan agama. Bahkan di dalam internal penganut Buddhisme pun banyak yang tidak memahami hal tersebut, ada yang menyebut Tuhan sebagai karma (Pali: kamma) dan ada juga yang menganggap Nirvana (Pali: Nibbana) sebagai Tuhan. Pada dasarnya Buddhisme tidak membicarakan tentang permasalahan ketuhanan (non-theistic religion), akan tetapi dalam literaturnya masih dibahas mengenai makhluk-makhluk adi-kodrati seperti dewa dan brahma. Pembahasan mengenai dewa dan brahma ini yang sering disalahartikan dan dipandang sebagai Tuhan. Oleh sebab itu perlu ada penjelasan yang lebih terperinci untuk menegaskan bahwa, kalaupun ada diperlukan adanya konsepsi ketuhanan dalam Buddhisme, maka bentuk ketuhanan itu adalah betuk ketuhanan yang non-kualitas.