Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE GROUP INVESTIGATION DAN TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION DENGAN PENDEKATAN CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING PADA POKOK BAHASANGARIS DAN SUDUT DITINJAU DARI SIKAP SISWATERHADAP MATEMATIKA KELAS VII SMP Swasti Maharani; Budiyono Budiyono; Dewi Retno Sari Saputro
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 4, No 1 (2014): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v4i1.9994

Abstract: The objectives of this research were to find out: (1) which learning model of the GI with CTL approach, TAI with CTL approach or conventional learning results in a better learning achievement in mathematics; (2) which students attitudes toward mathematics of the positive, neutral, or negative types results in a better learning achievement in mathematics; (3) in each students attitudes toward mathematics, which learning model of the GI with CTL approach, TAI with CTL approach or conventional learning results in a better learning achievement in mathematics; and (4) in each learning model, which students attitudes toward mathematics of the positive, neutral, or negative types results in a better learning achievement in mathematics. This research used the quasi experimental research method with the factorial design of 3x3. Its population was all of the students in Grade VII of State Junior High Schools in Ngawi regency. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique. The data of the research were analyzed by using the unbalanced two-way analysis of variance at the significance level of 5%. The results of this study showed that: (1) the GI and TAI with CTL approach learning models result in the same good learning achievement in mathematics, but both result in a better learning achievement in mathematics than the conventional learning model; (2) the mathematics learning achievement with positive attitudes toward mathematics was better than that with neutral and negative attitudes towards matematics, that with neutral attitude towards matematics was better than that with negative attitudes toward mathematics; (3) in each students attitudes toward mathematics type, the GI and TAI with CTL approach learning models result in the same good learning achievement in Mathematics, but both result in a better learning achievement in mathematics than the conventional learning model; (4) in each learning model, the mathematics learning achievement with positive attitudes toward mathematics was better than that with neutral and negative attitudes towards matematics, that with neutral attitude towards matematics was better than that with negative attitudes toward mathematics.Key words: learning model, GI, TAI, conventional, CTL approach, students attitudes toward mathematics.

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW DAN NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER PADA POKOK BAHASAN BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN INTERPERSONAL SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KOTA MADIUN Kiki Riska Ayu Kurniawati; Budiyono Budiyono; Dewi Retno Sari Saputro
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 5, No 2 (2015): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v5i2.10026

Abstract: The aims of this research were to find out the different effect of each categories of learning model, students interpersonal intelligence and their interaction towards students mathematics learning achievement on the subject of plane geometry. The research was quasi experimental with 3×3 factorial design. The population was all students of grade VIII State Junior High School in Madiun City on the second semester of 2013/2014 academic years. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling technique. The sample of this research consisted of the students of SMP N 3 Madiun, SMPN 7 Madiun, and SMPN 10 Madiun. The sample consisted of 260 students. The hypothesis test used unbalanced two ways analysis of variance at the significance level of 0,05. Based on hypothesis test, it can be concluded that: (1) the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type gives a better mathematics achievement than cooperative learning model of NHT type and direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of NHT type gives a better mathematics achievement than direct learning model; (2) students with the high interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the medium interpersonal intelligence, students with the high interpersonal intelligence had better achievement than students with the low interpersonal intelligence and the students with the medium interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the low interpersonal intelligence; (3) on the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type, NHT type and direct learning model, students with the high interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the medium interpersonal intelligence, students with the high interpersonal intelligence had better achievement than students with the low interpersonal intelligence and the students with the medium interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the low interpersonal intelligence; and (4) on students interpersonal intelligence high, medium and low, the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type gives a better mathematics achievement than cooperative learning model of NHT type and direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of NHT type gives a better mathematics achievement than direct learning model.Keywords: Jigsaw, NHT, interpersonal intelligence

PENGEMBANGAN PERANGKAT PEMBELAJARAN DENGAN PENDEKATAN CTL PADA MATERI TEOREMA PYTHAGORAS DI KELAS VIII SEKOLAH MENENGAH PERTAMA Yafita Arfina Mu’ti; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Dewi Retno Sari Saputro
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 7, No 1 (2017): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v7i1.20242

Abstract: This study aimed to: (1) produce teaching and learning materials with CTL approach on Pythagorean theorem at VIII Grade of Junior High School that was valid, practical, and effective, (2) investigate the better achievement in mathematics, whether using teaching and learning materials of CTL approach than using conventional teaching and learning materials. This study was development research. The development model used in this research was a developmental research by Plomp that contained five phases, (1) preliminary investigation, (2) design, (3) realization/ construction, (4) test, evaluation, and revision, and (5) implementation. Teaching and learning materials said have quality if fulfilled validity, practical, and effective criteria. Teaching and learning materials was categorized validity based on expert judgement. Taeching and Learning materials was categorized practical if based on theory, teaching and learning materials was able to use it without revision or little revision and had fulfilled criteria of a practical teaching and learning materials. Teaching and learning materials was categorized effective if it fulfilled the indicators for a effective learning, including students activity during studying, learning activities based on syntax, student response about the learning, and students learning result. The data in this research was collected using test, questionnaire, observation, documentation, and interview. To investigate the better student achievement used t-test. The results of this study were as follows: teaching and learning materials of CTL approach that include lesson plans, worksheets, and test of learning outcome was said to be valid, practical, and effective. Besides that, student achievement with teaching and learning materials of CTL approach was better than student achievement with teaching and learning materials of conventional approach.Keywords: Teaching and learning materials, CTL, Pythagorean theorem

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI), PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) DAN PEMBELAJARAN KLASIKAL DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI BENTUK ALJABAR DITINJAU DARI AKTIVITAS BELAJAR SISWA Suprapto Suprapto; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Dewi Retno Sari Saputro
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 6, No 2 (2016): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v6i2.10062

Abstract: The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from student’s leraning activity. The learning models compared were TAI with scientific approach, PBL with scientific approach, and classical with scientific approach.This experiment was quasi-experimental. It uses 3 x 3 factorial planning. The population was the entire 8th grade students of State Junior high School in Grobogan regency in the academic year 2014/2015. The sampling technique used was stratified cluster random sampling. The sample consisted of students of SMP N 2 Tegowanu, SMP N 3 Godong and SMP N 5 Purwodadi. Data collection instruments used were learning achievement test and student learning activity questionnaire. Hypothesis examination used was variance analysis (anava) with unequal cell.Conclusions acquired from this thesis are as follows: 1) PBL using scientific approach gives better mathematics learning achievement compared to TAI and classical Learning, TAI using scientific approach gives better mathematics learning achievement compared to classical learning. 2) student’s mathematics achievement with high learning activity is better than those with intermediate and poor learning activity, intermediate learning activity is better than those with poor learning activity. 3) on TAI using scientific approach, student’s mathematics achievement with high learning activity is as good as those with intermediate learning activity, high learning activity is better than those with poor learning activity, and intermediate learning activity is good as those with poor learning activity. Students which is given PBL using scientific approach, students with high learning activity have mathematics learning achievement as good as those with intermediate learning activity, high learning activity is better than those with poor learning activity, and intermediate learning activity is good as those with poor learning activity. 4) for students with high learning activity, PBL gives learning achievement as good as TAI, PBL gives learning achievement better than classical learning, and TAI gives learning achievement better than classical learning. For students with intermediate learning activity; TAI, PBL and classical learning gives the same good result. For students with poor learning activity; TAI, PBL and classical learning gives the same good result on student’s learning achievement. And student’s learning achievement on algebra which is given PBL is as good as those which is given classical learning.Keywords: TAI using scientific approach, PBL using scientific approach, classical learning, learning activity, learning achievement

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PBL, JIGSAW DAN STAD TERHADAP PEMAHAMAN KONSEP DAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) SISWA Lia Ariati; Budiyono Budiyono; Dewi Retno Sari Saputro
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 6, No 2 (2016): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v6i2.10052

Abstract: The aim of this research was to know the effect of the Problem Based Learning (PBL), Jigsaw, and Students Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) to the mathematics conceptual understanding and problem solving viewed from students Adversity Quotient (AQ). The type of this research was quasi-experimental with factorial design 3x3. The population was all the students of grade XI IPS SMA/MA in Wonogiri on the second semester of 2014/2015 academic year. The sample of this research consisted of 224 students. The instruments that used to collect the data were early ability test, conceptual understanding test, problem solving test, and questionnaires Adversity Quotient of students. Data were analyzed using unbalanced two ways multivariate analysis of variance with a significance level α = 5%. The results of the research were as follows. (1)Students who were subjected to the PBL learning model have a better conceptual understanding than with the learning model of Jigsaw and STAD while students were subjected to the learning model of Jigsaw have a better conceptual understanding than with the learning model of STAD. (b) Students who were subjected to the PBL learning model have the same problem solving as students with the learning model of Jigsaw but it have better than with the learning model of STAD while students with Jigsaw learning models have the same problem solving as students with learning model of STAD (2)Students with high AQ have better conceptual understanding and problem solving than students with medium and low AQ, and the students with medium AQ were better than low AQ. (3)(a) In learning model of PBL and Jigsaw, students with high AQ have the same conceptual understanding as medium AQ but better than low AQ, and students with medium AQ have a better conceptual understanding than low AQ while in learning model of STAD, students with high AQ have a better conceptual understanding than students with medium and low AQ, and the students with medium AQ were better than low AQ. (b) In learning model of PBL, Jigsaw and STAD, students who have high AQ have better problem solving than students who have students with medium and low AQ, and students with medium AQ have a better problem solving than students with low AQ. (4)(a) For high and low AQ, students were subjected to the PBL learning model have the same conceptual understanding as students who were subjected to the learning model of Jigsaw and STAD while for medium AQ, students who were subjected to the learning model of PBL have the same conceptual understanding as students who were subjected to the learning model Jigsaw but better than STAD and students who were subjected to the learning model of Jigsaw have a better conceptual understanding than students who were subjected to the learning model of STAD. (b) In each AQ, students with the PBL learning model have the same problem solving as students with Jigsaw learning model but better than STAD learning model, and students with Jigsaw learning model have a better problem solving than students of STAD learning model.Keywords : PBL, Jigsaw, STAD, AQ, conceptual understanding, problem solving.

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) DAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI FUNGSI DITINJAU DARI INTERAKSI SOSIAL Heri Cahyono; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Dewi Retno Sari Saputro
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 5, No 2 (2015): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v5i2.10022

Abstract. The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from student’s social interaction. The learning models compared were TAI with scientific approach, TPS with scientific approach, and classical with scientific approach. The type of the research was a quasi experimental research with the factorial design of 3 x 3. The population were all eight grade students of Junior High School in Ngawi regency on academic year 2014/2015. The sample consisted of students of SMPN 3 Ngrambe, SMPN 2 Paron, and SMPN 2 Widodaren, which taken by using stratified cluster random sampling technique. The data of the research were collected through documentation, questionnaire, and test. The data was analyzed using unbalanced two-ways anova at the significance level of 0,05. Based on the data analysis, it can be concluded as follows. (1) TAI with scientific approach gives better mathematics achievement than TPS with scientific approach and classical with scientific approach, TPS with scientific approach and classical with scientific approach gives same mathematics achievement. (2) Students with high social interaction have better mathematics achievements than students with medium social interaction and low social interaction, while students with medium social interaction have better mathematics achievements than students with low social interaction. (3) For TAI with scientific approach, students with high and medium social interaction have the same mathematics achievements, and both have better mathematics achievement than low social interaction. For TPS with scientific approach, students with high social interaction have better mathematics achievement than students with medium and low social interaction, and students with medium and low social interaction have the same mathematics achievement. For classical with scientific approach, students with high social interaction have better mathematics achievement than students with medium social interaction, and both have the same mathematics achievement as students with low social interaction. (4) For students with high and low social interaction, all learning models gives the same mathematics achievement. For students with medium social interaction, TAI with scientific approach gives better mathematics achievement than TPS with scientific approach and classical with scientific approach, TPS with scientific approach and classical with scientific approach gives the same mathematics achievement.Keywords: TAI with scientific approach, TPS with scientific approach, classical learning, social interaction, learning achievement.

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NHT (NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER) DENGAN ASSESMENT FOR LEARNING (AfL) PADA MATERI HIMPUNAN DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN INTRAPERSONAL SISWA SEKOLAH MENENGAH PERTAMA SE-KABUPATEN TULUNGAGUNG Addin Zuhrotul ‘Aini; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Dewi Retno Sari Saputro
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 6, No 1 (2016): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v6i1.10044

Abstract: The aims of this study were to investigate: (1) among the model of NHT, NHT with AfL and classical model, which learning model can give better mathematics learning achievement. (2) which student’s have better mathematics learning achievement, those with high, medium, or low intrapersonal intelligence. (3) viewed from learning models, which student’s have better mathematics learning achievement those with high, medium or low intrapersonal intelligence. (4) viewed from intrapersonal intelligence, which learning model produces better mathematics learning achievement NHT with AfL, NHT or classical learning model. This research used quasi experimental method with its population included all of students of state junior high school in Tulungagung Regency. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling technique. The size of the samples was 266 students. The data collection technique was include the documentation method to get 2013/2014 initial capability data before the experiment, achievement test for mathematics student’s achievements data, and questioner of intrapersonal intelligence. The data was analyzed using analysis of variance. Based on the analysis, it can be concluded as follows. (1) The model of NHT with AfL providing better mathematics learning achievement than the model of NHT and classical, while the model of NHT providing better mathematics learning achievement than classical model. (2) Students with high intrapersonal intelligence have better mathematics learning achievement than students with medium or low intrapersonal intelligence, students with medium intrapersonal intelligence have better mathematics achievement than student’s with low intrapersonal intelligence. (3) Viewed from learning models, student’s with high intrapersonal intelligence have better mathematics learning achievement than medium or low, and medium intrapersonal intelligence have better mathematics learning than low intrapersonal intelligence. (4) Viewed from intrapersonal intelligence, mathematics learning using NHT with AfL resulted students with better mathematics learning achievement than using NHT and classical learning model, learning mathematics using NHT resulted students with better mathematics learning achievement than using classical learning model.Keywords: Numbered Head Together, Assessment for Learning, Intrapersonal Intelligence

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL), NUMBERED HEAD TOGETHER (NHT) DAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS BELAJAR SISWA PADA MATERI HIMPUNAN SMP NEGERI KABUPATEN KEBUMEN Prihastini Oktasari Putri; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Dewi Retno Sari Saputro
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract: The objectives of this research are to know: (1) which one was better result in learning achievement of mathematics among PBL, NHT, and TPS, (2) which one was better learning achievement among students in high, middle, and low creativity categories of mathematics, (3) in each learning model, which one was better learning achievement among students’ creativity categories, students having high, middle, or low; and (4) in each creativity categories, which one was better learning achivement among students of PBL, NHT, or TPS. This research used quasi-experimental research. The population was all of the students in Grade VII of State Junior High School in Kebumen. The samples of research were taken by using stratified cluster random sampling technique and consisted of 268 students. They divided into three groups. They were 92 students in the group of first experiment, 88 students in the group of second experiment, and 88 students in the group of third experiment. The instruments to collect the data were test of learning achievement and the questionnaire of learning creativity in mathematics. The data were examined by using two-way ANOVA with unbalanced cells. The results of the research were as follows. (1) Student in the model of PBL model result in a better learning achievement than NHT and TPS learning models. Student in NHT learning model results in a better learning achievement than TPS learning model. (2) Learning creativity gives students a different effect on mathematics’ learning achievement in the subject of set. The students with the high creativity have a better learning achievement than those with the middle and low categories, and student with the middle creativity have a better learning achievement than those with the low creativity categoriy. (3) In each learning model, students with the high creativity category have learning achievement as good as those with the middle or low categories. (4) In each of the creativity categories of students, students with the high creativity category of PBL have learning achievement as good as those in NHT and TPS, students with the middle creativity category of PBL have better learning achievement than those in TPS, then learning models of NHT and TPS have same learning achievement, and students in PBL and NHT have same learning achievement; last, in the low learning category, student in PBL have better learning achievement than those in TPS, student in NHT and TPS have same learning achievement and the student in PBL and NHT have same learning achievement.Keywords: Problem Based Learning, Numbered Head Together, Think Pair Share, and learning creativity.

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STRUCTURED NUMBERED HEADS (SNH) DAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI POKOK BILANGAN DITINJAU DARI KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VII SMPN DI KABUPATEN KEBUMEN Muslikhah Muslikhah; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Dewi Retno Sari Saputro
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract: The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from students self regulated learning (SRL). The learning model compared were SNH with scientific approach, PBL with scientific approach and classical with scientific approach. This research used quasi-experimental research with 3x3 factorial design. The population were all seventh grade students of SMPN in Kebumen on academic year 2014/2015. This research used stratified cluster random sampling technique and sample consisted of students of SMPN 3 Kebumen, SMPN 7 Kebumen, SMPN 1 Sruweng. The instruments used were documentation, questionnaire, and test. The data analysis technique was used unbalanced two ways anova at the significance level of 0.05. Based on the data analysis, it can be concluded as follows. (1) SNH with scientific approach gives better achievement than PBL and classical with scientific approach, and PBL with scientific approach gives better achievement than classical with scientific approach. (2) Students who have high SRL have better achievement than students who have medium and low SRL, students who have medium SRL have better achievement than students who have low SRL. (3) For SNH with scientific approach, students who have high and medium SRL have the same achievement, students who have high SRL have better achievement than students who have low SRL, students who have medium and low SRL have the same achievement. For PBL and classical with scientific approach students who have high SRL have the same achievement with students who have medium and low SRL, students who have medium and low SRL have the same achievement. (4) For high SRL of the students, SNH and PBL with scientific approach gives the same achievement, SNH with scientific approach gives better achievement than classical with scientific approach, PBL and classical with scientific approach gives the same achievement. For medium and low SRL of the students, SNH with scientific approach gives the same achievement with PBL and classical with scientific approach, PBL and classical with scientific approach gives the same achievement.Keywords: SNH, PBL, Scientific Approach, Self Regulated Learning (SRL)

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) DAN MODEL KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENT (TGT) PADA MATERI DIMENSI TIGA DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KREATIF SISWA (KBK) Nanda Noor Fadjrin; Budiyono Budiyono; Dewi Retno Sari Saputro
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract. The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of the learning models on achievement viewed from creative thinking abilities (CTA) of the students. The learning models compared were PBL, TGT and direct instruction (DI). The type of the research was quasi-experimental research with 3x3 factorial design. The population of this research was the students in grade X senior high school in Purbalingga on academic year of 2014/2015. The size of the sample was 277 students, which was taken by using stratified cluster random sampling technique. The instruments used for data collection were creative thinking test and achievement test. The hypothesis test used unbalanced two ways analysis of variance. The results of the research were as follows. (1) PBL gave better achievement than TGT and DI. TGT gave better achievement than DI. (2) The students with high and medium CTA had better achievement than the students with low CTA. The students with medium CTA had better achievement than the students with low CTA. (3) In PBL, the students with high CTA had better achievement than medium and low CTA, the students with medium and low had the same achievement. In TGT, the students with high and medium CTA had the same achievement, the students with high CTA had better achievement than low CTA, the students with medium and low CTA had the same achievement. In DI, the students with high, medium and low CTA had the same achievement. (4) At the students with high CTA, PBL and TGT gave the same achievement. PBL and TGT gave better achievement than DI. At the students with medium CTA, PBL and TGT gave the same achievement, PBL gave better achievement than DI, TGT and DI gave the same achievement. The students with low CTA, PBL, TGT and DI gave the same achievement.Keywords: Problem Based Learning, Teams Games Tournamnet, Direct Instruction, Creative Thinking Abilities , Achievement.

Title

Found 14 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 14 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 14 Documents
Search