Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL CENDEKIA HUKUM Ensiklopedia of Journal Pagaruyuang Law Journal
Riki Zulfiko
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Barat
Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Paradigma Sexsual Consent Dalam Pembaharuan Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual Riki Zulfiko
Pagaruyuang Law Journal Volume 5 Nomor 2, Januari 2022
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31869/plj.v5i2.3151

Abstract

Gerakan feminisme hukum telah berkontribusi besar terhadap diterimanya paradigma sexual consent dalam hukum pidana, banyak negara negara eropa merubah hukum pidana mereka dan memasukkan sexual consent sebagai paradigma dalam pelanggaran sexual dinegara mereka. Ide menggunakan sexual consent dalam pembaruan hukum pidana Indonesia dipandang bertentangan dengan cita hukum pancasila dan dianggap melegalisasi zina. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji konseptual paradigma sexual dalam pandangan feminsme hukum dan kesesuainnya dengan nilai sosiofilosofis bangsa Indonesia serta pandagan hukum pidana terhadap penggunaan paradigma sexual consent dalam tindak pidana kekerasan seksual.peneltian ini menggunakan pendekatan konseptual dengan merujuk pada pandangan ahli hukum dan doktrin doktrin hukum.
THE DISTINCTION LAW OF PROCEDURE OF CORRUPTION CASE AND THE GENERAL COURT IN INDONESIAN CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM Sukmareni Sukmareni; Roni Efendi; Riki Zulfiko
JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum) Vol 6, No 2 (2021): JCH (JURNAL CENDEKIA HUKUM)
Publisher : STIH Putri Maharaja

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33760/jch.v6i2.337

Abstract

The Corruption Crime Court which based on Article 5 of the corruption Court Law has the authority to examine, adjudicate and decide on the corruption crime cases, money laundering crimes that was initiated by corruption crime and criminal acts that are expressly stipulated in other laws that considered as corruption act. The existence of sovereignty possessed by the State gives rise to jurisdiction (the authority to judge) in regulating the needs of the state both internally and externally. As a sovereign country, Indonesia has jurisdiction in resolving internal and external problems. There are three questions of the research; 1) What is the procedural law of the General Court in the Indonesian criminal justice system? 2) What is the procedural law of the Corruption Crime Court in the Indonesian criminal justice system?, 3) What is the difference between the procedural law of the Corruption Crime Court compared to the law of the General Court in the Indonesian criminal justice system ?.This research is hoped that the procedural laws used in the General Courts and the Corruption Crime Courts will be known, as well as the differences in the procedural laws used in the two Courts. This research is descriptive, using a normative juridical approach, especially the legal approach, used are secondary data as the main legal material in the form of laws relating to the procedural law of general courts and Corruption Crime courts. and qualitative analisis. Based on the research, it was found that differences in the procedural law of Corruption Crime courts compared to general court procedural law in the Indonesian criminal justice system were seen in the independence  of the Corruption Crime court institutions and the material that became the authority and the judicial process with the composition and members of the Panel of Judges consisting of career judges and ad hoc judges. division of duties for the presiding judge and its members, the period of time for the examination of the Corruption Crime and the evidence used, as well as their secret registrations which are also special in nature.
PELAKSANAAN PEMENUHAN HAK NARAPIDANA UNTUK MENDAPATKAN PEMBINAAN KEMANDIRIAN DAN KETERAMPILAN DI LEMBAGA PEMASYARAKATAN KELAS III SULIKI Miftahul Jannah; Sukmareni Sukmareni; Riki Zulfiko
Ensiklopedia of Journal Vol 6, No 1 (2023): Vol. 6 No. 1 Edisi 2 Oktober 2023
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Penerbitan Hasil Penelitian Ensiklopedia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33559/eoj.v6i1.1962

Abstract

Correctional Institutions is a place to provide guidance to Prisoners and Correctional Students. Article 2 of Government Regulation number 31 of 1999 concerning the Guidance and Guidance of Correctional Assisted Citizens explains that the coaching and coaching activity program includes personality and independence coaching and development. Prisoners will receive guidance on independence and skills to equip them when they return to society. Regarding the implementation of independence and skills development, there are several obstacles faced by the Correctional Institutions Suliki Class III Penitentiary. This research is normative and empirical legal research, namely research that refers to legal norms contained in statutory regulations, literature, existing legal norms and data obtained from document studies and interviews at Class III Prison Suliki and then analyzed to answer community problems in this study related to the implementation of rights fulfillment to obtain independence and skill development. The results of the study show that the implementation of fulfilling the rights of convicts to gain independence and skills training has been going well, but there are still some obstacles. Prison Suliki has made several efforts to overcome obstacles in the implementation of independence and skills in Prison Suliki, but the efforts made are still not optimal due to budget constraints.
Co-Authors Efendi, Roni Miftahul Jannah Sukmareni Sukmareni Sukmareni Sukmareni