This Author published in this journals
All Journal HUKUM BISNIS
Arief Dwi Atmoko
Universitas Narotama

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

KEDUDUKAN HUKUM PENYIDIK TERHADAP OBYEK PRAPERADILAN Arief Dwi Atmoko
Jurnal HUKUM BISNIS Vol 2 No 1 (2018): Jurnal Hukum Bisnis
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Narotama

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (114.367 KB) | DOI: 10.33121/hukumbisnis.v2i1.591

Abstract

The supreme court issued the principle of law number 4 in 2016 on prohibition of judicial decision for a review of pre judicial. Weighing of the award the constitutional court 21/PUU-XII/2014 IS the result a review article 77 KUHAP judicial, and the constitutional court number 65/PUU-IX/2011 is the result the state judicial to review the rate of article 83 verse 2 KUHAP. In shortcut number 4 years 2016 explained that phrase ‘ evidence ‘, beginning enough evidence is a minimum of two evidence any, as well as “the suspect”, “the seizure”, and “shake down”. Are including amongst the as an object pre judicial. As in the law and that there is no legal remedy again. Intended legal remedy was “for a review of the ban to the award pre judicial”. After shortcuts number 4 years 2016 former has been no longer legal remedy to a preliminary injuction, and now this pre judicial decisions really final.
PEMBAHARUAN HUKUM AGRARIA DI INDONESIA Suwardi .; Arief Dwi Atmoko
Jurnal HUKUM BISNIS Vol 3 No 2 (2019): Volume 3 no.2, Oktober 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Narotama

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (119.212 KB) | DOI: 10.31090/hukumbisnis.v3i2.972

Abstract

The policy of implementing Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Agrarian Regulations (UUPA) is centered on services for the people, especially the peasantry, which is the largest part of the Indonesian people whose economic conditions are weak. At that time, the provisions of landreform began to be implemented concerning restrictions on the control of agricultural land, the prohibition of land ownership in a hurry (absentee), redistribution of land affected by landreform and absentee provisions, profit-sharing arrangements and agricultural land pawn. In addition, the abolition of colonial rights and the provisions on the conversion of land rights which were originally stipulated in the old legal instruments, became new rights according to the LoGA
KONSEPSI KEKUASAAN LEGISLASI PRESIDEN DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR 1945 Heru Kuswanto; Arief Dwi Atmoko
Jurnal HUKUM BISNIS Vol 4 No 1 (2020): Vol.4 no.1 April 2020
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Narotama

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31090/hukumbisnis.v4i1.1019

Abstract

Penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis dan memahami kesesuaian kekuasaan legislatif presiden setelah amandemen UUD 1945 terhadap prinsip-prinsip sistem presidensial. Penelitian hukum ini menggunakan pendekatan statuta, konseptual, komparatif, dan historis. Bahan hukum primer dan sekunder yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini dikumpulkan melalui literatur yang menyelidiki dan menginventarisir bahan hukum dengan dokumen, buku literatur, jurnal hukum, dan undang-undang yang terkait dengan objek penelitian. Bahan hukum yang telah diperoleh dijelaskan dan disajikan secara deskriptif dan analitik dengan menggunakan metode deduktif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kekuasaan legislatif presiden setelah amandemen UUD 1945 tidak sesuai dengan prinsip sistem presidensial pemerintahan secara eksplisit memisahkan kekuasaan eksekutif dan legislatif dalam sistem kekuasaan sebagai implementasi dari gagasan pembatasan negara kekuatan dan prinsip kedaulatan rakyat. Kekuasaan legislatif presiden setelah amandemen UUD 1945 cenderung melemahkan fungsi legislatif, menciptakan ketidakseimbangan antara eksekutif dan legislatif, dan menghambat realisasi legislasi sesuai dengan kehendak rakyat. Kata kunci: Konsepsi Kekuasaan, UUD 1945, Legislasi
TINJAUAN PUTUSAN HAKIM TENTANG PELAKSANAAN EKSEKUSI TERHADAP NO. 1099/PID.B/2017/PN.SBY IAN SOEMARDI; ARIEF DWI ATMOKO
Jurnal HUKUM BISNIS Vol 4 No 2 (2020): Vol 4 no 2 Oktober 2020
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Narotama

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine and analyze the decision of the Surabaya district court and follow-up on these decisions in the criminal justice system in Indonesia, as we know that criminal law enforcement includes a series of processes starting from investigation, investigation, prosecution and will lead to the formation of a judge's decision. as the peak and basis for the execution of the convicted person. Judges in drafting their decisions must reflect a sense of justice, a sense of usefulness and legal certainty. in the decision against decision no. 1099 / PID.B / 2017 / PN.SBY, which the author reviewed and analyzed, that the judge in compiling his decision did not include the defendant to leave the house at issue in court so that in the provisions of Article 167 Paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code so that the decision does not reflect justice , benefits and legal certainty in Indonesia.Keywords: verdict, fairness, benefit, certainty