Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal Of Science Education And Management Business
Nina Gusmala Delvi
Universitas Putra Indonesia YPTK Padang
Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Improving Purchase Decisions In Pandemic Times Through Expected Value By Analyzing Direct Selling And Sales Promotion at CV. Dunia Unggas Emil Salim; Nina Gusmala Delvi
Journal Of Science Education And Management Business Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): JOSEAMB ( Januari 2022 )
Publisher : Riset Sinergi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (327.437 KB)

Abstract

In this study are consumers who are in West Sumatra. Sampling using Double sampling technique namely Quota Sampling and Purposive Sampling.Based on the results of parisial research (t test) shows that there is a significant effect (0.042 <0.05) between direct selling on expected value, there is a significant effect (0.000 <0.05) between sales promotion on expected value, there is a significant influence significant (0.000 <0.05) between direct selling and sales promotion on expected value, there is an insignificant effect (0.100 <0.05) between direct selling on purchasing decisions, there is a significant effect (0.000 <0.05) between sales promotion on buying decision,There is a significant effect (0.001 <0.05) between expected value on purchasing decisions, There is a significant effect (0.005 <0.05) between direct selling and sales promotion on purchasing decisions with expected value as an intervening variable, the direct effect of direct selling (X1) is smaller than with the indirect effect of direct selling (X2 through expected value (Z) on purchasing decisions (Y), The direct effect of sales promotion (X1) is greater than the indirect effect of sales promotion (X2 through expected value (Z) on purchasing decisions (Y), the contribution of direct selling variables, sales promotion to expected value has an effect of 42.1%, the remaining 57 , 9% is influenced by other variables outside of this study, the contribution of direct selling, sales promotion variables to purchase decisions through expected value has an effect of 60.6%, the remaining 59.6% is influenced by other variables outside of this study.
Improving Purchase Decisions In Pandemic Times Through Expected Value By Analyzing Direct Selling And Sales Promotion at CV. Dunia Unggas Emil Salim; Nina Gusmala Delvi
Journal Of Science Education And Management Business Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): JOSEAMB ( Januari 2022 )
Publisher : Riset Sinergi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

In this study are consumers who are in West Sumatra. Sampling using Double sampling technique namely Quota Sampling and Purposive Sampling.Based on the results of parisial research (t test) shows that there is a significant effect (0.042 <0.05) between direct selling on expected value, there is a significant effect (0.000 <0.05) between sales promotion on expected value, there is a significant influence significant (0.000 <0.05) between direct selling and sales promotion on expected value, there is an insignificant effect (0.100 <0.05) between direct selling on purchasing decisions, there is a significant effect (0.000 <0.05) between sales promotion on buying decision,There is a significant effect (0.001 <0.05) between expected value on purchasing decisions, There is a significant effect (0.005 <0.05) between direct selling and sales promotion on purchasing decisions with expected value as an intervening variable, the direct effect of direct selling (X1) is smaller than with the indirect effect of direct selling (X2 through expected value (Z) on purchasing decisions (Y), The direct effect of sales promotion (X1) is greater than the indirect effect of sales promotion (X2 through expected value (Z) on purchasing decisions (Y), the contribution of direct selling variables, sales promotion to expected value has an effect of 42.1%, the remaining 57 , 9% is influenced by other variables outside of this study, the contribution of direct selling, sales promotion variables to purchase decisions through expected value has an effect of 60.6%, the remaining 59.6% is influenced by other variables outside of this study.
Co-Authors Emil Salim