Articles
<![CDATA[Desentralisasi dan kesehatan keuangan daerah di Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Q.A., Dhea Tikha]]>;
<![CDATA[sujarwoto, sujarwoto]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik Vol 1, No 1 (2015): Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[FIA UB ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (13.531 KB)
|
DOI: 10.9874/fia-ub.v1i1.527
<![CDATA[Local government fiscal health is important for effective fiscal decentralisation. This study examines local government fiscal decentralisation in Indonesia. Data comes from Indonesian Financial Information System 2013. The findings show that after more than four decades decentralisation, most of local governments are still strongly depend on central government in financing local development. The wide gap of fiscal capacity exists between local government at Java and outside Java. The findings suggest that improving local government capacity in mobilising and managing fiscal resources is vital to improve local government fiscal health in decentralised Indonesia.]]>
<![CDATA[Desentralisasi, tata kelola pemerintahan, dan kemiskinan di negara-negara berkembang ]]>
<![CDATA[Sujarwoto, Sujarwoto]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik Vol 1, No 1 (2015): Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[FIA UB ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (13.531 KB)
|
DOI: 10.9874/fia-ub.v1i1.519
<![CDATA[Theoretical arguments of the link between decentralisation, governance and poverty reduction are merit, but the implementation of decentralisation often fails to reduce poverty. This paper examines why decentralisation works and does not work to reduce poverty in developing countries. It shows that decentralisation will benefit for poverty alleviation if exist local political competition, community participation, and capacity of local government.]]>
<![CDATA[Desentralisasi, dinasti politik dan kemiskinan di Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Sujarwoto, Sujarwoto]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik Vol 1, No 2 (2015): Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[FIA UB ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (13.531 KB)
|
DOI: 10.9874/fia-ub.v1i2.535
<![CDATA[This paper examines the link between decentralisation, political dynasty and poverty in Indonesia. Data come from Indonesia Social Economic Survey 2013 and official statistics. Multilevel modelling is used to test whether people live in districts with political dynasty are poorer compared to other districts without political dynasty. The results show people live in districts with political dynasty are significantly poorer and it robust with other individual and district characteristics. The results highlight the detrimental effect of political dynasty on poverty in Indonesia and therefore policy makers should aware of the danger of political dynasty which can impede decentralisation in reducing poverty.]]>
<![CDATA[Communal Conflict in Indonesia: Contagious or Latent Issues? ]]>
<![CDATA[Sujarwoto, Sujarwoto]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Vol 19, No 2 (2015) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Gadjah Mada ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini mengkaji faktor sosial, ekonomi dan politik sengketa komunal yang terjadi di Indonesiadan menguji bagaimana sengketa komunal secara spasial terhubung antarkabupaten atau kota di seluruhIndonesia. Data bersumber dari Sensus Potensi Desa (Podes) tahun 2008 dan laporan statistik pemerintahyang berisi informasi mengenai sengketa komunal di seluruh kabupaten/kota di Indonesia (N kabupaten/kota= 465). Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa sengketa komunal di Indonesia terjadi akibat adanya faktorfaktorlaten di dalam kabupaten/kota. Dibandingkan dengan keragaman agama dan etnis, sengketa komunalmemiliki hubungan kuat dengan kemiskinan, ketimpangan ekonomi, elite capture dan lemahnya kapasitaskabupaten/kota dalam mengelola sumber-sumber fi skal daerah.]]>
<![CDATA[Model task sharing dalam community based healthcare: studi kasus pada program SMART Health di Desa Sidorahayu Kecamatan Wagir Kabupaten Malang Jawa Timur ]]>
<![CDATA[Sujarwoto, Sujarwoto]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik Vol 4, No 1 (2018): Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[FIA UB ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (13.531 KB)
<![CDATA[This paper examines model of task sharing in community based healthcare within SMARThealth program in Sidorahayu village Malang East Java Indonesia. A single case study was applied to explore task sharing model from health workers to non health workers in health screening for risks of cardiovascular disease. Indepth interviews were conducted to 10 key informants between January to May 2018. The findings show that task sharing model occurs within a health facility in which non health workers can provide services with adequate competency and quality. Responsibilities in health screening is delegated to lower level health service providers so that it can effectively reach consumers. The results sugests that task sharing model provides an alternative model for solving low number and distribution of health workers in rural areas in providing health screening for cardiovascular risks.]]>
<![CDATA[Why decentralization in Indonesia is not good for reducing women fertility? Results from National Socio Economic Survey 2002-2014 and a case study ]]>
<![CDATA[Abrianty, Tria]]>;
<![CDATA[Sujarwoto, Sujarwoto]]>
<![CDATA[ JPAS (Journal of Public Administration Studies) Vol 2, No 1 (2017) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[FIA UB ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (651.137 KB)
|
DOI: 10.21776/ub.jpas.2017.002.01.4
<![CDATA[This study examines the relationship between decentralization and women fertility in Indonesia. Mixed methods combining multilevel analyses of National Survey Data (Susenas) 2002-2014 and a case study of Empat Lawang district were used to examine the relationship and to elaborate why fiscal, administrative and political decentralization do not contribute for reducing women fertility in the country. The findings show that decentralization in Indonesia do not contribute for reducing women fertility. It reveals that lack of district fiscal capacity, lack of competencies of street level bureaucrats, and lack of district mayor political commitment in family planning challenges the promises of decentralization for reducing women fertility. The findings conclude that decentralization in the country may not an effective way for reducing and controlling women fertility. The government may revitalize decentralized family planning and population control programs by addressing those three challenges.]]>
<![CDATA[Why decentralization works and does not works? A systematic literature review ]]>
<![CDATA[Sujarwoto, Sujarwoto]]>
<![CDATA[ JPAS (Journal of Public Administration Studies) Vol 2, No 1 (2017) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[FIA UB ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (437.014 KB)
|
DOI: 10.21776/ub.jpas.2017.002.01.1
<![CDATA[This systematic literature review is purposed to elaborate why decentralization works and does not works? The results show that decentralization will increase public services at sub national level or local government when certain conditions exist. Empirical findings across developing countries in last decades show that decentralization will benefit for improving local public services when competitive and fair local election, transparency, checks and balance, citizen participation and community social capital exists. Capacity of public servants and availability of basic infrastructures is also key conditions for effective decentralization across developing countries.]]>
<![CDATA[Health information inequalities and child healthcare: Evidence from Indonesia National Socio-Economic Survey 2013 ]]>
<![CDATA[Sujarwoto, Sujarwoto]]>
<![CDATA[ JPAS (Journal of Public Administration Studies) Vol 3, No 1 (2018) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[FIA UB ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (1210.783 KB)
|
DOI: 10.21776/ub.jpas.2018.003.01.8
<![CDATA[This study for the first time examines the relationship between health information inequalities and child healthcare access in Indonesia, a developing country has been cited as one biggest emerging Internet users in the world. Data come from the Indonesian National Socio-Economic Survey (Susenas) 2013, which comprises 1.25 million individuals, 250 thousands households, and 497 districts. The results of descriptive and instrumental variable analysis indicate trend of widening disparities across socio-economic status and geographical areas in Internet and child immunisation access. A strong evidence for the causal flow running from a mother’s access to Internet to child immunisation is found. All instruments are highly correlated with mother’s access to Internet but uncorrelated with child immunisation. Supply factors across districts – particularly village health posts (posyandu) – are associated with child immunisation. The results are robust against individual, household and district socio-economic characteristics associated with child immunisation access. The results suggest that increasing mother’s access to Internet may bridge child immunisation disparities in Indonesia.]]>
<![CDATA[Why does fiscal decentralization negatively affect student dropout rates? Results from Indonesia’s National Socioeconomic Survey 2002-2014 and two case studies ]]>
<![CDATA[Pujiastuti, Reni Tri]]>;
<![CDATA[Sujarwoto, Sujarwoto]]>
<![CDATA[ JPAS (Journal of Public Administration Studies) Vol 2, No 1 (2017) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[FIA UB ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (653.119 KB)
|
DOI: 10.21776/ub.jpas.2017.002.01.2
<![CDATA[The consequences of fiscal decentralization on basic education outcomes are always debatable. Yet, its consequences on student dropout rates remain questionable. In this paper, we examine why fiscal decentralization in Indonesia has not effectively reduced student dropout. Mixed method analyses combining the Indonesian National Socioeconomic Survey (Susenas) 2002-2014 and two case studies in the districts of Sleman and Yogyakarta are used to explore the reasons for which fiscal decentralization has not reduced student dropout in Indonesia. Instead of reducing student dropout, we found that fiscal decentralization increases the risk of student dropout at the elementary school, transitional and junior secondary school levels. We found lack of fiscal capacity, inefficiency of educational budget allocation, and technical inefficiency in program implementation to be the main challenges that prevent district governments from effectively reducing student dropout.]]>
<![CDATA[Does decentralization good for reducing communal conflict? A multilevel analysis of communal conflict at Indonesia’s villages 2008-2014 ]]>
<![CDATA[Rusyiana, Aris]]>;
<![CDATA[Sujarwoto, Sujarwoto]]>
<![CDATA[ JPAS (Journal of Public Administration Studies) Vol 2, No 1 (2017) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[FIA UB ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (1155.42 KB)
|
DOI: 10.21776/ub.jpas.2017.002.01.3
<![CDATA[Whether decentralization is good for reducing communal conflict is still debatable. This study examines the linkage between three types of decentralization and communal conflict in Indonesia. Data come from the Village National Census (Podes) 2008-2014 (N=234,717). Results of multilevel logit regression shows that only administrative decentralization that significantly associated with reducing communal conflict, while fiscal and political decentralization are not. The findings suggest that decentralization work for reducing communal conflict through better capacity of local bureaucrats.]]>
