Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
2.058
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Indonesian Journal of Legality of Law Clavia: Journal of Law
Andi Tira
Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bosowa
Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 14 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Indonesian Journal of Legality of Law

 1 
ANALISIS HUKUM PENYELESAIAAN SENGKETA HAK ATAS TANAH DI KAWASAN WADUK TUNGGU PAMPANG KOTA MAKASSAR Muhammad Taufiq; Baso Madiong; Andi Tira
Indonesian Journal of Legality of Law Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): Indonesian Journal of Legality of Law, Desember 2022
Publisher : Postgraduate Bosowa University Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35965/ijlf.v5i1.1894

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui penyelesaian sengketa hak atas tanah setelah pembangunan Waduk Tunggu Pampang dan efektivitas penyelesaian sengketa hak atas tanah setelah pembangunan Waduk Tunggu Pampang. Metode penelitianayang di gunakan adalah studi hukum. Hasil studi menunjukkan Masyarakat Waduk Tunggu Pampang lebih memilih penyelesaian sengketa tanah melalui mediasi yang dilakukan oleh Kantor ATR/BPN Kota Makassar dan musyawarah para pihak tanpa mediasi  diaKecamatan Manggala mematuhi aturan dan peraturan mediasi sengketah Tanah diatur dengan keputusan kepala ATR/BPN Republik Indonesia No. 34 Tahun 2007 tentang Petunjuk Teknis Penyelesaian dan Penyelesaian Masalah Pertanahan.. Proses penyelesaian suatu sengketa memiliki beberapa pendekatan yang salah satunya adalah mediasi yang merupakan upaya penyelesaian sengketa melalui perundingan Cari bentuk kesepakatan penyelesaian yang dapat disepakati oleh para pihak atau masyarakat menantang di Waduk Tunggu Pampang. Penyelesaianasengketaahakaatasatanah di kawasan Waduk Tunggu Pampang  lebih efektif  melalui mediasi dibanding secara musyawarah tanpa mediator. Hal itu disebabkan karena hasil mediasi lebih berkepastian hukum dan hasil mediasi dapat langsung ditindak lanjut oleh kantor ATR/BPN Kota Makassar. Sedangkan penyelesaian sengketa Tanah melalui musyawarah para pihak tanpa mediasi masih terdapat celah untuk diingkari oleh kedua belah pihak karena bisa disusupi oleh mafia Tanah This study aims to determine: Settlement of land rights disputes after the construction of the Waiting Pampang Reservoir The effectiveness of the settlement of land rights disputes after the construction of the Waiting Pampang Reservoir. The research method used is normative law research. The results showed that the people of the Tunggu Pampang Reservoir prefer to settle land disputes through mediation carried out by the Makassar City ATR/BPN Office and non-mediation parties deliberation in Manggala District in accordance with the regulations and mechanisms of land dispute mediation as regulated in the Decree of the Head of ATR. / BPN of the Republic of Indonesia Number 34 of 2007 concerning Technical Guidelines for Handling and Settlement of Land Problems. The process of resolving a dispute has several approaches, one of which is mediation, which is an effort to resolve disputes through negotiations upon by the parties or the community in dispute at the Waiting Pampang Reservoir. Settlement of land rights disputes in the Waiting Pampang Reservoir area is more effective through mediation than through deliberation without a mediator. This is because the results of the mediation have more legal certainty and the results of the mediation can be directly followed up by the Makassar City ATR/BPN office. While the settlement of land disputes through deliberation of the parties without mediation, there is still a gap for both parties to deny because it can be infiltrated by the land mafia.
TEORI PEMBUKTIAN PADA PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA HAK MILIK ATAS TANAH: Studi Kasus: Putusan Nomor 6/Pdt.G/2020/Pn.Wsn Mappasessu Mappasessu; Zulkifli Makkawaru; Andi Tira
Indonesian Journal of Legality of Law Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): Indonesian Journal of Legality of Law, Desember 2022
Publisher : Postgraduate Bosowa University Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35965/ijlf.v5i1.1898

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis tentang teori pembuktian apa yang digunakan oleh Hakim terhadap putusan penyelesaian sengketa hak milik atas tanah Nomor: 6/Pdt.G/2020/Pn.Wsn di Pengadilan Negeri Watansoppeng. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yakni Yuridis – Empiris, awalnya meneliti data primer putusan hakim dalam suatu pengadilan kemudian dilanjutkan penelitian data sekunder Teori Pembuktian Perdata yang digunakan penegak hukum. Penelitian empiris dengan meneliti secara langsung ke lokasi penelitian yang berkaitan dengan putusan hakim terhadap suatu putusan, serta melakukan wawancara dengan Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Watansoppeng. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Majelis Hakim menerapkan Teori Pembuktian Yang Negatif Menurut Undang Undang (Negatief-Wettelijke), dengan melihat beberapa aspek pendekatan yakni Alat bukti berupa SPPT-PBB, Minimal 2 (dua) Alat Bukti, Beban Pembuktian, Pemeriksaan Setempat, Persangkaan. This study aims to find out and analyze what theory of evidence is used by the judge in the decision to settle disputes over land ownership rights Number: 6/Pdt.G/2020/Pn.Wsn at the Watansoppeng District Court. The research method used is Juridical - Empirical, initially examining primary data on judge decisions in a court then continuing with secondary data research on Civil Evidence Theory used by law enforcement. Empirical research by examining directly to research locations related to the judge's decision on a decision, as well as conducting interviews with the Judges of the Watansoppeng District Court. The results showed that the Panel of Judges applied the Negative Theory of Evidence According to the Law (Negatief-Wettelijke), by looking at several aspects of the approach, namely the evidence in the form of SPPT-PBB, a minimum of 2 (two) pieces of evidence, burden of proof, local examination, and suspicion.
ANALISIS HUKUM PENGEMBALIAN SISA HASIL LELANG OBJEK JAMINAN HAK TANGGUNGAN Kamsilaniah Kamsilaniah; Juliati Juliati; Andi Tira; Firman Aswari
Indonesian Journal of Legality of Law Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023): Indonesian Journal of Legality of Law, Juni 2023
Publisher : Postgraduate Bosowa University Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35965/ijlf.v5i2.2209

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui proses lelang objek Hak Tanggungan oleh KPKNL Palopo dan untuk mengetahui akibat hukum jika hasil lelang tidak diterima oleh debitur. Penelitian ini dilakukan di Kantor Pelayanan Kekayaan Negara dan Lelang Palopo, Kota Palopo, Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan dan menggunakan metode tipe penelitian Normatif-Empiris. Pendekatan dilakukan dengan kepustakaan dalam kenyataan berdasarkan wawancara dengan para pihak yaitu pihak debitur dan pihak KPKNL Palopo serta dokumentasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa, pelaksanaan proses lelang objek hak tanggungan oleh KPKNL Palopo telah dilaksanakan sesuai dengan Peraturan Menteri Keuangan No. 27/PMK.06/2016 tentang Petunjuk Pelaksanaan Lelang. Akan tetapi pelaksanaan lelang tersebut tidak berlandaskan asas keadilan oleh karena penentuan nilai limit ditentukan oleh pihak penjual berdasarkan pasal 17 ayat (1) huruf e PMK No 27/PMK.06/2016 Selain itu, akibat hukum dari hasil lelang yang tidak diterima oleh debitur, oleh karena menurut debitur tidak sesuai perkiraannya, sehingga sisa hasil lelang tersebut dititipkan di Pengadilan Negeri Makale. Sesuai ketentuan pasal 1404 KUHPerdata yang mengatur tentang uang penitipan di Pengadilan Negeri. This study aims to determine the auction process for dependent rights objects by KPKNL Palopo and to find out the legal consequences if the auction results are not received by the debtor. This research was conducted at the Palopo State Wealth and Auction Service Office, Palopo City, South Sulawesi Province, and used a Normative-Empirical research type method. The approach is carried out with literature in reality based on interviews and documentation. The results showed that the implementation of the auction process for dependent rights objects by the Palopo KPKNL had been carried out in accordance with the Minister of Finance Regulation No. 27 / PMK.06 / 2016 concerning Instructions for Auction Implementation. However, in fulfilling the conditions for the auction process, there are some deviations where there are principles that are not accommodated by the rights of one of the parties in this case the owner of the goods or debtor because the auction process does not meet the principle of fairness. In addition, the legal consequence is that if the auction proceeds are not received by the debtor, this is because they do not attend/receive the remaining money from the auction due to objections and do not receive the auction proceeds, the remaining money from the auction can be deposited in the District Court in accordance with the provisions of article 1404 of the Civil Code which regulates deposit money in the District Court.
Co-Authors Abdul Haris Hamid Almusawir Nansa Alvionita Winda Aswari Anti Nari Ardhina Wijayanti Baso Madion Baso Madiong Basri Oner Budi Mangawi Firman Aswari Imam S Mansyur Juliati Juliati Kamsilaniah Kamsilaniah Mappasessu Mappasessu Muh. Reza Arisman Muhammad Akmal Jaya Muhammad Taufiq Musdalipa Musdalipa Pratiwi Handayani Daswar Syahrul Gunawan Veronica grisshanta Erga Zulkifli Makkawaru Zulkifli Makkawaru