Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JOURNAL EQUITABLE ARSY : Jurnal Aplikasi Riset kepada Masyarakat JKP (Jurnal Kajian Pemerintah: Journal of Government Social and Politics)
Radian Suparba
Universitas Islam Riau
Humanities Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
TINJAUAN PERLINDUNGAN KARAKTER FIKSI MELALUI MEREK BERDASARKAN STUDY KASUS SENGKETA MEREK SUPER MARIO BROSi Sri Arlina; Radian Suparba; Teguh Rama Prasja
JOURNAL EQUITABLE Vol 7 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37859/jeq.v7i2.4274

Abstract

The case of a fictional character who became a trademarks is the case of the "Super Mario Bros" trademarks in which individual trademarks holders, Indonesian companies and the Director General of Intellectual Property were sued by a well-known game company, Nintendo. The crew of 'mario bros' characters were used as packaging designs and characters in the game, but because the game has been loved by people in countries such as Australia, Malaysia, India, China, including Indonesia in the 90s (nineties), Nintendo decided to register the character. "super mario bros" and its variants use trademark registration media. This means that the Nintendo company avoids legal turmoil caused by irresponsible parties to use fictional characters have sold tens of thousands of copies.However, even though it has been registered, there are still parties who have managed to get the rights to the brand with the "Super Mario Bros" logo. Registered in 1994 in the name of an individual or individual before being transferred to a legal entity or company.
Upgrading Permasalahan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Bagi Aparat Penegak Hukum di Kantor DPRD Pelalawan Provinsi Riau Abd Thalib; Dafrizal Dafrizal; Della Cessa; Nur Aisyah Thalib; Radian Suparba
ARSY : Jurnal Aplikasi Riset kepada Masyarakat Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): ARSY : Jurnal Aplikasi Riset kepada Masyarakat
Publisher : Lembaga Riset dan Inovasi Al-Matani

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55583/arsy.v3i2.404

Abstract

Permasalahan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI) saat  ini  semakin  rumit,  permasalahannya, karena   sistem   HKI   semakin   berkembang   sehingga   membutuhkan pemahaman  detail  tentang  HKI.  Pada  akhirnya, permasalahan  HKI  tidak hanya  berpengaruh  di  dalam  negeri  tapi  juga  memiliki  pengaruh  di  luar negeri,  hal  ini dikarenakan  HKI  memiliki  pengaruhi  ekonomi,  sosial  ,  budaya  dan hukum. Hak  kekayaan  intelektual  merupakan  benda  yang  tidak  berwujud  namun  memiliki  nilai ekonomi yang berpengaruh bagi masyarakat banyak. Umumnya, jika benda dapat terlihat maka memiliki objek yang jelas juga sehingga dapat dinilai, namun karena Hak Kekayaan Intelektual adalah  benda  tidak  berwujud  yang  tidak  terlihat  dan  tidak  teraba,  maka  permasalahan  timbul dalam menilainya sebagai objek hukum karena objek yang didapatkan hanyalah berupa ‘hak’. Permasalahan  tidak  terhenti  disitu  saja,  dimana  HKI juga  menjadi  alat penghalang  inovasi,  menghilangkan  pencipta  karya,  mempertahankan  serta  memiliki  indikasi pencemaran  nama  baik,  yang  mana  keseluruhan  tergantung  pada  pemahaman  tentang  sistem hukum  HKI di  Indonesia  dan  secara  universal,  karena  kasus-kasus  HKI akan dipelajari sebagai bahan penerapan sistem hukum bisnis di berbagai Negara.  
HUKUM INVESTASI DITINJAU DARI THE PRINCIPLE OF SOVEREIGN EQUALITY erlina erlina; Zulherman Idris; Radian Suparba
Jurnal Kajian Pemerintah: Journal of Government, Social and Politics Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023): Oktober
Publisher : UIR Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25299/jkp.2023.vol9(2).14227

Abstract

The results of the WTO panel's decision were recorded in the DS 592 lawsuit. The final panel report was issued on October 17, 2022, stating that the export policy and the obligation to process and refine nickel minerals in Indonesia proved to violate WTO Article XI provisions. GATT 1994 and cannot be justified by Article XI.2 (a) and XX (d) GATT 1994. The purpose of the provisions of WTO Article XI.1 GATT 1994 states that each WTO member country is prohibited from making restrictions other than tariffs, taxes and other duties , and not other restrictions including quotas and licensing of imports or sales in the framework of export. There are two consequences that will be faced by Indonesia, including having to pay losses to the European Union (EU) as the plaintiff arising from the nickel export ban. Second, facing retaliation from the European Union's ban on other Indonesian commodities or in fiscal prohibition instruments. Problems in the field of capital loading are related to demands and threats to the principle of equality of sovereignty against investors who are treated differently, amid demands to make as much profit as possible. The principle can be a way out for investors to withdraw from investing in arbitration or court courts, so that Indonesia will suffer losses. Thus, it is necessary to explain the concept to understand the principle of sovereign equality and its influence in Indonesian laws and regulations in the field of capital protection, so as to provide a clear picture of the treatment of investors.
Co-Authors Abd Thalib Dafrizal Samsudin Della Cessa Erlina Erlina Nur Aisyah Thalib Sri Arlina Teguh Rama Prasja Zulherman Idris