Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Urgensi Pengaturan Perkara Constitutional Complaint Dalam Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nugroho, Rahmat Muhajir
Jurnal Hukum Novelty Vol 7, No 1 (2016)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (620.757 KB)

ABSTRACTThis study aimed to evaluate the mechanism for settling disputes in the Constitutional Court containing elements of constitutional complaint. In particular, this study focused on two things: first assessing the urgency/ importance of the idea of setting constitutional complaint in the Constitutional Courts authority. Secondly, to formulate recommendations on setting constitutional complaint in the Constitutional Courts authority.The method used in this research is descriptive qualitative. This type of research is a doctrinal law. This research studied the concept and implementation of the judicial settlement of cases that contain elements of constitutional complaint (complaint constitution) by the Constitutional Court.The conclusion of this study is an important constitutional complaint mechanism is contained within the competence of the Constitutional Court to solve problems of injustice experienced by citizens as a result of public policies undertaken by the government in a broad sense, namely the executive, legislature and judiciary. Setting constitutional complaint within the competence of the Constitutional Court does not have to be explicitly stipulated in the constitution, but enough in the explanation of the Constitutional Court Act. That is not to add direct authority of the Court, but expand the meaning of the authority of the Court in testing the law.

Simultaneous Local Election in Indonesia: Is It Really More Effective and Efficient? Nugroho, Rahmat Muhajir; Asmorojati, Anom Wahyu
Jurnal Media Hukum Vol 26, No 2, December 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jmh.20190135

Election system that is not carried out simultaneously, among others, has led to high political costs of local election. One of the objectives of the simultaneous local election design is the budget efficiency of the election implementation. This study aims to evaluate whether the simultaneous local election implementation may create a more effective and efficient local elections in the Special Region of Yogyakarta and South Kalimantan. This research was conducted using a normative juridical approach by analysing the applicable legal regulations, particularly Law Number 8 of 2015. In addition, an empirical juridical approach was used to see the implications of the establishment of Law Number 8 of 2015 on the Local Election. The results of study showed that the simultaneous local elections held in the Special Region of Yogyakarta and South Kalimantan were more effective and efficient in terms of controlling and solving problems, budgeting and time used for the implementation of the local election.

Simultaneous Local Election in Indonesia: Is It Really More Effective and Efficient? Nugroho, Rahmat Muhajir; Asmorojati, Anom Wahyu
Jurnal Media Hukum Vol 26, No 2, December 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jmh.20190135

Election system that is not carried out simultaneously, among others, has led to high political costs of local election. One of the objectives of the simultaneous local election design is the budget efficiency of the election implementation. This study aims to evaluate whether the simultaneous local election implementation may create a more effective and efficient local elections in the Special Region of Yogyakarta and South Kalimantan. This research was conducted using a normative juridical approach by analysing the applicable legal regulations, particularly Law Number 8 of 2015. In addition, an empirical juridical approach was used to see the implications of the establishment of Law Number 8 of 2015 on the Local Election. The results of study showed that the simultaneous local elections held in the Special Region of Yogyakarta and South Kalimantan were more effective and efficient in terms of controlling and solving problems, budgeting and time used for the implementation of the local election.

Urgensi Pengaturan Perkara Constitutional Complaint Dalam Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Rahmat Muhajir Nugroho
Jurnal Hukum Novelty Vol 7, No 1 (2016)
Publisher : Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

ABSTRACTThis study aimed to evaluate the mechanism for settling disputes in the Constitutional Court containing elements of constitutional complaint. In particular, this study focused on two things: first assessing the urgency/ importance of the idea of setting constitutional complaint in the Constitutional Court's authority. Secondly, to formulate recommendations on setting constitutional complaint in the Constitutional Court's authority.The method used in this research is descriptive qualitative. This type of research is a doctrinal law. This research studied the concept and implementation of the judicial settlement of cases that contain elements of constitutional complaint (complaint constitution) by the Constitutional Court.The conclusion of this study is an important constitutional complaint mechanism is contained within the competence of the Constitutional Court to solve problems of injustice experienced by citizens as a result of public policies undertaken by the government in a broad sense, namely the executive, legislature and judiciary. Setting constitutional complaint within the competence of the Constitutional Court does not have to be explicitly stipulated in the constitution, but enough in the explanation of the Constitutional Court Act. That is not to add direct authority of the Court, but expand the meaning of the authority of the Court in testing the law.

Tinjauan Yuridis Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Sebagai Tindak Lanjut Atas Putusan Pengujian Undang-Undang Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi Indra Wicaksono; Rahmat Muhajir Nugroho
Ahmad Dahlan Legal Perspective Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah, pertama, untuk mengetahui dan mengkaji secara yuridis pelaksanaan putusan uji materiil oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi yang tidak berbentuk Undang-Undang. Kedua, untuk mengetahui dan mengkaji pengaturan ke depan mengenai pembentukan Undang-Undang yang Berlaku sebagai implementasi dari putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian dengan jenis penelitian hukum normatif. Sumber data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah sumber data sekunder dengan bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Metode pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah studi pustaka dan analisis dengan teknik analisis deskriptif kualitatif. Berdasarkan hasil pembahasan dapat dijelaskan sebagai berikut. Pertama, putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi tentang uji materi yang dilaksanakan dengan bentuk hukum selain undang-undang dengan menguji Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tidak sesuai jika bentuk hukum selain undang-undang yang mengimplementasikan atas putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi tentang uji materi tersebut. Kedua, putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi tentang uji materi harus dilaksanakan dengan undang-undang. Maka dari itu penulis memberikan rekomendasi pelaksanaan terhadap putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi mengenai uji materiil tersebut, agar tidak terdapat berbagai bentuk hukum pelaksanaan terhadap putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi tersebut; regulasi yang tumpang tindih; dan ketidakpastian hukum.

Reconstruction of the mechanism of nomination for president and vice president in elections in indonesia Rahmat Muhajir Nugroho
Borobudur Law Review Vol 4 No 2 (2022): Vol 4 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31603/burrev.6905

The candidacy threshold of President and Vice President in Act Number 7 the Year 2017 concerning Elections causes the Political Party of Elections Participants unable to submit the President and Vice President candidates independently and the recent political parties that participated in 2019 elections. Political Parties have lost their constitutional rights as they cannot propose the candidates of President and Vice President. It is required to find an alternative mechanism of President and Vice President candidacy which grants more protection to the Political Parties' constitutional rights and achieves the essence of people's sovereignty. Article 222 of Act Number 7 the Year 2017 requires the Political Party to have a minimum of 20% seats in the House of Representatives or a minimum of 25% votes of the previous legislative election to submit presidential candidacy. Meanwhile, article 6A section (2) of the 1945 Indonesian Constitution does not govern regarding President and Vice President candidacy; thus, article 222 of Act Number 7 the Year 2017 contradicts the Constitution. The provision in the Elections Act has several implications, among others, limiting the freedom of political parties to submit president candidate, causing discrimination, injustice, and a material loss to the new political party. Moreover, the threshold is not in accordance with the essence of people's sovereignty as granted in the Constitution.

Title

Found 6 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 6 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 6 Documents
Search