Kaharuddin Kaharuddin
Magister Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Implementasi Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 Tentang Administrasi Perkara Dan Persidangan Di Pengadila Secara Elektronik: Studi Kasus Pada Pengadilan Agama Maros Kaharuddin Kaharuddin; Syahruddin Nawi; Anggreany Arief
Journal of Lex Generalis (JLG) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023): Journal of Lex Generalis (JLG)
Publisher : Journal of Lex Generalis (JLG)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian menganalisis penerapan asas nebis in idem dalam penyelesaian perkara perdata pada putusan Nomor 352/Pdt.G/2019/PA. Mrs.; (2) mengetahui dan menganalisis pertimbangan hakim pemeriksa perkara Nomor 352/Pdt.G/2019/PA. Mrs dalam menerapkan asas nebis in idem. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif . Hasil Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa: (1) penerapan asas nebis in idem dalam perkara perdata Putusan Nomor 352/Pdt.G/2019/PA Mrs. sudah sesuai dengan hukum acara yang berlaku di Indoensia, karena unsur-unsur suatu perkara dikatakan sebagai nebis in idem telah terpenuhi secara hukum; (2) pertimbangan majelis hakim dalam memutuskan perkara tersebut sudah tepat dan benar menurut hukum. The research objective is to analyze the application of the nebis in idem principle in the settlement of civil cases in decision No. 352/Pdt.G/2019/PA. Mrs.; (2) knows and analyze the considerations of the judge examining case Number 352/Pdt.G/2019/PA. Mrs. in applying the principle of nebis in idem. This research is normative legal research. The results of this study indicate that: (1) the application of the principle of nebis in idem in civil cases Decision Number 352/Pdt.G/2019/PA Mrs. is in accordance with the procedural law applicable in Indonesia because the elements of a case are said to be nebis in idem legally fulfilled; (2) the considerations of the panel of judges in deciding the case are appropriate and correct according to law.
Analisis Penerapan Asas Hukum Pada Perjanjian Sektor Jasa Konstruksi Kaharuddin Kaharuddin; Syahruddin Nawi; Salle Salle
Journal of Lex Philosophy (JLP) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): Journal of Lex Philosophy (JLP)
Publisher : Doktor Ilmu Hukum Program Pascarajana Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian menganalisis penerapan berbagai asas hukum perjanjian dalam berbagai perjanjian jasa konstruksi yang dikemas dalam bentuk perjanjian baku (standad contract). Metode penelitian yang adalah tipe penelitian hukum normative (doctrinal) Hasil penelitian, (1). Asas-asas yang harus terealisasi atau terjabarkan pada perjanjian atau kontrak pada sektor jasa konstruksi yakni: Asas konsensualisme, kebebasan berkontrak, asas kekuatan mengikat perjanjian (pacta sun servanda), asas itikat baik, asas kepercayaan, asas personalia, asas persamaan hukum, asas keseimbangan, asas kepastian hukum, asas kepatutan, asas kebiasaan, asas perlindungan, asas keadilan, asas kepatutan, asas kemanfaatan, dan asas moral. (2). Bahwa beberapa asas-asas perjanjian belum terealisasi atau terjabarkan secara optimal pada berbagai perjanjian atau kontrak pada sektor jasa konstruksi yakni asas kebebasan berkontrak, asas persamaan hukum, asas kepatutan, asas moral dan asas keseimbangan. The research objective is to analyze the application of various legal principles of agreement in various construction service agreements which are packaged in the form of standard contracts. The research method is a type of normative (doctrinal) legal research. Research results, (1). The principles that must be realized or described in agreements or contracts in the construction services sector are the principle of consensual, freedom of contract, the principle of the power of binding agreements (pacta sun servanda), the principle of good faith, the principle of trust, the principle of personnel, the principle of legal equality, the principle of balance, the principle of legal certainty, the principle of propriety, the principle of custom, the principle of protection, the principle of justice, the principle of propriety, the principle of expediency, and the principle of morals. (2). That several principles of agreement have not been realized or explained optimally in various agreements or contracts in the construction services sector, namely the principle of freedom of contract, the principle of legal equality, the principle of propriety, the moral principle and the principle of balance