Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Criminal Liability of Perpetrators of Embezzlement in Position at PT. Tunas Baru Lampung (Study of Decision Number 96/Pid.B/2022/PN.Gns) Zulfi Diane Zaini; Yulia Hesti; Bayu Chandra Wijaya
AURELIA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia Vol 2, No 1 (2023): January 2023
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/aurelia.v2i1.295

Abstract

Among several criminal acts related to property and goods, there is a crime known as embezzlement where abuse of trust dominates as the main element in the occurrence of this crime. The problem in this research is what factors cause the perpetrator to commit the crime of embezzlement in his position at PT. Tunas Baru Lampung based on Decision Number 96/Pid.B/2022/PN.Gns, What is the criminal responsibility for the perpetrators of embezzlement of office at PT. Tunas Baru Lampung based on Decree Number 96/Pid.B/2022/PN.Gns. The factor that caused the defendant to commit embezzlement was due to economic factors where the defendant wanted to control the goods and then sell them and the money from the sale would be divided into three and the money would be used by the defendant for their daily needs. The defendant is responsible for his actions pursuant to Article 374 of the Penal Code. Jo Article 55 paragraph (1) 1 of the Criminal Code, the defendant was sentenced to nine months in prison.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA PELAKU PENGGELAPAN DALAM JABATAN DI PT. TUNAS BARU LAMPUNG (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 96/PID.B/2022/PN.GNS): Universitas Bandar Lampung Zulfi Diane Zaini; Yulia Hesti; Bayu Chandra Wijaya
YUSTISI Vol 10 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ibn Khaldun Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32832/yustisi.v10i2.14335

Abstract

Among several criminal acts related to assets and objects, there is a crime known as embezzlement where abuse of trust dominates as the main element in the occurrence of this crime. The problem in this study is what are the factors that cause the perpetrator to commit the crime of embezzlement in his position at PT. Tunas Baru Lampung based on Decision Number 96/Pid.B/2022/PN.Gns, What is the criminal responsibility for the perpetrators of embezzlement in positions at PT. Tunas Baru Lampung based on Decision Number 96/Pid.B/2022/PN.Gns. The factor that caused the defendant to commit embezzlement was due to economic factors where the defendant wanted to control the goods and then sell them and the money from the sale would be divided into three and the defendant would use the money for daily needs. The defendant is responsible for his actions based on Article 374 of the Criminal Code. In conjunction with Article 55 paragraph (1) 1st of the Criminal Code, the defendant was sentenced to nine months in prison. Keywords: criminal liability, embezzlement, in office
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA PELAKU PENGGELAPAN DALAM JABATAN DI PT. TUNAS BARU LAMPUNG (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 96/PID.B/2022/PN.GNS) Zulfi Diane Zaini; Yulia Hesti; Bayu Chandra Wijaya
YUSTISI Vol 10 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ibn Khaldun Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32832/yustisi.v10i2.14335

Abstract

Among several criminal acts related to assets and objects, there is a crime known as embezzlement where abuse of trust dominates as the main element in the occurrence of this crime. The problem in this study is what are the factors that cause the perpetrator to commit the crime of embezzlement in his position at PT. Tunas Baru Lampung based on Decision Number 96/Pid.B/2022/PN.Gns, What is the criminal responsibility for the perpetrators of embezzlement in positions at PT. Tunas Baru Lampung based on Decision Number 96/Pid.B/2022/PN.Gns. The factor that caused the defendant to commit embezzlement was due to economic factors where the defendant wanted to control the goods and then sell them and the money from the sale would be divided into three and the defendant would use the money for daily needs. The defendant is responsible for his actions based on Article 374 of the Criminal Code. In conjunction with Article 55 paragraph (1) 1st of the Criminal Code, the defendant was sentenced to nine months in prison. Keywords: criminal liability, embezzlement, in office