Yordan Gunawan
Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta and Facultat de Dret, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Spain

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Should the JCPOA be Revived? An Analysis of the Iran Nuclear Deal Yordan Gunawan; Aisyah Ajeng Putri Riyanto; Wandita Surya Putri; Cyabriena Asela; Dwilani Irrynta
Nurani Hukum Vol. 5 No. 2 December 2022
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51825/nhk.v5i2.16776

Abstract

The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) is referred to as one the peaceful settlement of the international dispute in the form of a multilateral agreement restricting Iran's nuclear development in exchange for the lifting of economic sanctions. However, some issues have emerged since the agreement entered into effect. The United States withdrew from the agreement and reimposed the economic sanctions against Iran, consequently affecting Iran’s commitment to its nuclear obligations. State Parties' initiative to reinstate the agreement in its original form is invalid under international law since the issue is Iran and the United States' actions. In this research, the authors examined the termination and establishment of a new agreement as a strategy to overcome existing issues. The research methodology combines qualitative research with normative legal research. The results showed that the JCPOA is a "treaty of contract" agreement that binds only the State Parties and must be terminated because the unilateral United States withdrawal and Iran's loosening of compliance obligations effected the agreement to run out of control, preventing it from achieving its targeted purpose. After the agreement is terminated, a new agreement on Iran's nuclear program should establish in accordance with international law. 
Police Brutality as Human Rights Violation: A Study Case of Black Lives Matter Yordan Gunawan; Amarta Yasyhini Ilka Haque; Paul Atagamen Aidonojie
Varia Justicia Vol 19 No 1 (2023): Vol 19 No.1 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31603/variajusticia.v19i1.6588

Abstract

Today’s unresolved human rights issue is racial misbehavior and police brutality in all of its manifestations. The United States of America stands as a horrifying example of a State that has failed to protect its citizens against bigotry. This has been especially visible in recent years, with several incidents of unjustified police shootings of African-Americans culminating in the formation of the global movement known as “Black Lives Matter,” abbreviated as BLM, which began quietly as a Twitter hashtag. Thus, this study addressed how the legal enforcement against police brutality in the case of Black Lives Matter in the US in regards to human rights violations based on international human rights perspective. The author employed normative research in this study which focuses on library (literature) studies and emphasizes reading and analyzing resources. The result showed that police brutality against Black people is common in the US. Despite the fact that the US has considered regulatory frameworks that establish standards that address discriminatory racial practices in the targeting and killing of unarmed Black boys and men, the implementation of police brutality protection in the US has yet to be effective and thorough. As a result, national action is required to address this issue. There is an urgent need for top management and institutions to step up their supervision of police behavior in order to address the abuse of power by some police forces.