Amalia Septiani
Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Implementasi Desain Pembelajaran Inovatif Ppda Masa Pandemi Covid-19 di SDN Pondok Jengkol Ina Magdalena; Amalia Septiani; Aura Rahmatun Rafidah
TSAQOFAH Vol 3 No 3 (2023): MEI
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/tsaqofah.v3i3.961

Abstract

Schools in Indonesia have stopped offering in-person instruction due to the spread of the Covid-19 pandemic. Instead, students learn through online or distance learning. For online and distance education, qualified and easily accessible technology support is required. Revolution 4.0 is the right learning program that can be used today to respond to technological advancements and educational advancements. However, Indonesia's human resource issues, particularly those pertaining to schoolchildren, remain extremely complex. When it comes to teaching, teachers also face a lot of challenges. As a result, the purpose of this community service project, which takes the form of online-based learning design training during the Covid-19 pandemic, is to boost teachers' ability to implement online-based learning designs at Pondok Jengkol Public Elementary School in Tangerang. This service uses mentoring and training to plan and create online learning designs. Participants in this service activity will be able to create online learning designs by incorporating technology into public elementary school education. The improvement of online-based learning plans is bundled as logical articles, then, at that point, a collection of internet learning plans is made. The book can be used as a reference to add scientific knowledge and insights to public elementary school learning about online-based learning design.
Analisis Pendekatan Realistic Mathematic Education dalam Pemahaman Pembelajaran Bangun Datar Siswa Kelas 3 SD Een Unaenah; Amalia Septiani; Nurfadilah Nurfadilah; Siti Mariyam
MASALIQ Vol 3 No 6 (2023): NOVEMBER
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/masaliq.v3i6.1566

Abstract

RME learning is an approach to student-centered mathematics learning that links students to the real world. But in reality, teachers more often use conventional learning. One of the difficulties of students in understanding learning material is influenced by the approach used by the teacher which is still not appropriate and interesting and very influential on student learning outcomes in mathematics. This study aims to: (1) analyze the mathematics learning outcomes of students who use the PMRI application, (2) analyze the mathematics learning outcomes of students who do not use the PMRI application, (3) analyze significant differences in mathematics learning outcomes between those who use and do not use the PMRI application . This study uses a quantitative approach. The type of research used is Quasi Experimental Design, using the Nonequivalent Control Group Design quasi experimental design. The population in this study were 40 students in class III at SDN JURUMUDI 4. Sampling using total sampling technique is a sampling technique in which all members of the population are taken as a sample. The sample in this study were 20 students in class III A as the control class and 20 students in class III B as the experimental class. Data analysis of the results of this study used the Malnn-Whitney test. Based on the data analysis that has been done by the researcher, it can be concluded that: (1) The mathematics learning outcomes of third grade students at SDN JURUMUDI 4 who use the PMRI application have an average of 82. (2) The mathematics learning outcomes of third grade students at SDN JURUMUDI 4 who not using PMRI implementation has an average of 58.65. (3) There is a significant difference in mathematics learning outcomes in class III students at SDN JURUMUDI 4 between those who use and do not use the PMRI application. The results of the analysis show a significant value of 0.00 <0.05, so H0 is rejected. It can be concluded that the mathematics learning outcomes of students who were taught using PMRI were better than the mathematics learning outcomes of students who were not taught using PMRI.