Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Pengaruh Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/Puu/Xvii/2019 Terhadap Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia (Studi Pada Pt. Adira Dinamika Multifinance Tbk Cabang Bengkulu) Meliza Meliza
JISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan Vol 7, No 2 (2023): JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan)
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pendidikan (LPP) Mandala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58258/jisip.v7i2.4869

Abstract

Currently, the need for cars or motorbikes is no longer dominated by people with strong economies. Small and medium businesses are also starting to use these two types of vehicles in developing their business and productivity so that car/motorbike rentals continue to increase. The purpose of this research is to find out and analyze the implementation system of fiduciary guarantees at PT. Adira Dinamika Multifinance, Tbk Bengkulu Branch. (ADMF), especially after the Constitutional Court decision no. 18/PUU/XVII/2019. Empirical legal research is the method used, and the format or presentation of research findings about the laws that apply in society. The central point of the research is not on the theory and formulation of norms but on how the law works in PT. ADMF. The results of the study are the application of fiduciary guarantees made to customers who default by taking back collateral from their own or third parties who receive facilities. Involve the recipient of the facility to show where the collateral is sold or transferred in order to return the collateral, which has not been completed and has not been resolved, it will be resolved in the fairest way possible. According to the Ruling of the Constitutional Court Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019, namely "the execution of a fiduciary guarantee cannot be carried out unilaterally by the creditor and must go through a District Court decision unless there is an agreement between the debtor and the creditor to resolve this execution issue.
EMPIRICAL JURIDICAL REVIEW OF EARLY MARRIAGE DISPENSATION (Case Study of the Cikarang and Pangkal Pinang Religious Courts) Meliza Meliza; Hanif Hardianto; Seno Wibowo Gumbira; Megafury apriandhini; Madina Dzakkiyyah Chairunnisa; Nadia Nurani Isfarin
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol 23, No 2 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i2.4179

Abstract

Currently the country is trying to improve Human Resources (HR) on a large scale, especially in Indonesia to advance the nation, but the high rate of early marriage has an impact on the progress of the younger generation where marriages that are held without careful preparation both from the economy, education, psychology and sociology also have an impact on the next generation born and personal and social development in society also occurs unprepared. Law No. 1 of 1974 Jo Law No. 16 of 2019 About was passed by the government as an effort to prevent early marriage by limiting the minimum age of 19 years for men and women. The purpose of this research is to find out what factors cause the application for marriage dispensation and obstacles in the application for marriage dispensation in religious courts and what steps are used in the event of rejection of the application. The method used The data collection method used in this research is an empirical juridical review by conducting observations, comparisons and interviews with sources from the Religious Court and informants who apply for marriage dispensation. Causes for advocating marriage dispensation include religious reasons, special circumstances, parental/guardian consent, legal considerations. In the implementation of the application for marriage dispensation, there are also obstacles, namely the difficulty of completing data. In the event of rejection of the application for marriage dispensation, the applicant can make cassation.