Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Data Science and Software Engineering
Muhammad Syahriani Noor Basya Basya
Lambung Mangkurat University
Computer Science & IT

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Implementasi Metode Haralick dengan Random Forest Classifier untuk identifikasi Penyakit Kentang Pada Citra Daun Muhammad Syahriani Noor Basya Basya; Andi Farmadi; Dwi Kartini; Radityo Adi Nugroho; Rudy Herteno
Journal of Data Science and Software Engineering Vol 3 No 03 (2022)
Publisher : Fakultas MIPA Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Potato plants are one of the most widely grown food crops in the highlands of Indonesia. Besides being used as food, potatoes are now known to be used to fight free radicals, control blood sugar, and nourish the digestive system. Therefore, potatoes have good prospects for development. In connection with efforts to develop potatoes in Indonesia, there are obstacles, namely the attack of potato plants by disease. As for the disease in potato plants, one of the characteristics of knowing it is on the leaves. To identify the leaf image, the texture feature is an important feature to recognize the leaf from an image. This is because there are differences in texture between normal and diseased leaves. To perform image processing through texture features, one method that can be used is haralick. In this study, a system was created to identify the types of diseases present in potato leaves using the Haralick method with the Random Forest Classifier. The image used is 300 data consisting of 3 classes, namely Late Blight, Early Blight, and Health. In this study, the testing was carried out by dividing the training and testing data with a percentage of 70:30, 80:20, and 90:10. The highest accuracy value in this study was obtained by using a combination of 80:20 split data, which was 0.88. The 70:30 data split gets an accuracy of 0.85 and the 90:10 data split gets an accuracy of 0.87.
Co-Authors Andi Farmadi Dwi Kartini, Dwi Radityo Adi Nugroho Rudy Herteno