Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur

Peran sanro bola dalam tradisi membangun rumah tradisional Bugis di Kabupaten Soppeng Asta Juliarman Hatta; Iwan Sudradjat
ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur Vol 5 No 1 (2020): ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur | Januari 2020 ~ April 2020
Publisher : Program Studi Arsitektur Fakultas Teknik Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (453.473 KB) | DOI: 10.30822/arteks.v5i1.119

Abstract

The role of sanro bola in construction of Bugis traditional house in Soppeng District The diversity of race and culture makes Indonesia a country with abundance of culture. Traditional houses which have diverse form are symbol and reflection of culture in every tribe in Indonesia. The shape and architectural value of traditional Bugis houses in Sulawesi Selatan which still remains thanks to the efforts of Bugis tribe community is an example of house-building culture which still exists today. The involvement of cultural leader such as Sanro bola in tradition of Bugis’ house-building culture is essential, because they have knowledge and experiences passed on through generations. This study aims to reveal the role of Sanro bola in preserving the traditional values of building a Bugis Soppeng house. The method of this research is qualitative with explorative analysis. The result of the study revealed that the role of Sanro bola in the process of building a traditional Bugis Soppeng house divided into 6 aspects; as leader, material selection, considering about a good time and day, house orientation, constructing of traditional houses, and application of philosophy sulapa epapa'e. These six aspects are applied by Sanro bola in both physical and non-physical with the aim of providing direction and safety for the residents of the house.
Teori dalam penelitian arsitektur Iwan Sudradjat
ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur Vol 5 No 1 (2020): ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur | Januari 2020 ~ April 2020
Publisher : Program Studi Arsitektur Fakultas Teknik Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (243.409 KB) | DOI: 10.30822/arteks.v5i1.378

Abstract

Theory in architectural research ”Teori” merupakan terminologi yang maknanya jarang dipahami dengan benar oleh para mahasiswa, dosen dan bahkan peneliti sekalipun. Gambaran mental yang mereka miliki tentang teori adalah sesuatu yang abstrak, mengawang-awang, rumit, oleh karena itu dianggap sebagai hal yang patut dihindari. Seorang sosiolog terkenal Ian Craib (1984) dengan tepat memberikan gambaran tersebut: ”The very word “theory”sometimes seems to scare people … (Only) few people feel at home with theory or use it in a productive way”. Tidak dapat dibantah, teori mempunyai kedudukan yang sangat penting dalam penelitian di bidang ilmu apapun, termasuk penelitian di bidang arsitektur. Teori berperan untuk menjelaskan keterkaitan antara suatu fenomena dengan data empiris yang diamati dan dianalisis secara sistematis oleh peneliti. Kerlinger (1973) mendefinisikan teori sebagai ”seperangkat konsep, definisi dan proposisi yang menyajikan gambaran sistematik tentang suatu fenomena beserta hubungan di antara variabel-variabelnya, dengan tujuan memberi penjelasan atau memprediksi tentang fenomena tersebut”. Lebih lanjut Neuman (2003) menjelaskan bahwa teori memiliki peran penting dalam mengkaitkan suatu hasil penelitian dengan sejumlah pengetahuan relevan yang telah disumbangkan oleh para peneliti sebelumnya, sehingga melalui penelitiannya seorang peneliti tidak hanya mampu melihat sebatang pohon, tetapi sebuah hutan yang dipenuhi dengan banyak pohon. Teori dengan kata lain berperan meningkatkan kesadaran peneliti terhadap interkonektisitas di antara data dan hasil penelitian. Sayangnya banyak peneliti yang tidak mampu secara eksplisit menentukan teori mana yang sesuai dengan penelitiannya, dan bagaimana teori tersebut harus digunakan. Sebagai akibatnya mereka cenderung menjadi peneliti yang a-teoretis dan perannya hanya terbatas pada kolektor data empiris. Untuk meneliti tentang makna dalam arsitektur misalnya, seorang peneliti secara eksplisit harus menetapkan alternatif teori mana yang paling relevan baginya di antara sekian banyak teori yang telah berkembang, apakah teori strukturalisme, fenomenologi, pasca strukturalisme atau teori lainnya.
"Bersenang-senang dalam keberlanjutan": Konsep hedonistic sustainability pada karya Bjarke Ingels Nita Dwi Estika; Yudhistira Kusuma; Dewi Retno Prameswari; Iwan Sudradjat
ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur Vol 5 No 3 (2020): ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur | September 2020 ~ Desember 2020
Publisher : Program Studi Arsitektur Fakultas Teknik Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30822/arteks.v5i3.487

Abstract

Contemporary architects highlight past ideas and present new manifestos often perceived as utopian. Bjarke Ingels introduced hedonistic sustainability in response to the demand for environmentally friendly and sustainable living through different perspectives. This paper comprehensively explains the concept of hedonistic sustainability through the designs of Bjarke Ingels, a contemporary architect. Literature from various sources is examined to describe Bjarke Ingels' idea. Hedonistic sustainability combines sustainable ideas, fun, and community. Bjarke Ingels's architectural design is applied through simulation and an ironic approach. Its representation facilitates the exploration of the design objects planned concretely. The idea of playful and communality was raised through the design that accommodates various user activities. Bjarke Ingels's idea is expected to contribute to the knowledge and contemporary architecture design process in Indonesia. © 2020 Nita Dwi Estika, Yudhistira Kusuma, Dewi Retno Prameswari, Iwan Sudradjat
Interaksionisme simbolik dalam penelitian lanskap budaya vernakular Irfan Sabarilah Hasim; Indah Widiastuti; Iwan Sudradjat
ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur Vol 8 No 1 (2023): ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur | Januari 2023 ~ April 2023
Publisher : Program Studi Arsitektur Fakultas Teknik Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30822/arteks.v8i1.2080

Abstract

Customary and traditional villages, also called vernacular cultural landscapes, are local settlement units whose inhabitants adhere to ancestral beliefs. It is important to conduct research on vernacular cultural landscapes in Indonesia, given the usual and concerning degradation of cultural landscapes. Different places have different cultures and different customary rules and habits. Each has its uniqueness and distinctiveness, so there is no one standardized approach or method that can be adapted to study the vernacular cultural landscape. Different places may require different research approaches or methods; even the same place if studied under a different topic or time frame, may also require a different approach or method. There are research approaches commonly used by the researcher of the vernacular cultural landscape, including phenomenology, narrative study, case study, grounded theory, and ethnography. This article will review one approach that can be an alternative for the researcher of the vernacular cultural landscape, namely Symbolic Interactionism. Symbolic Interactionism is an approach that can be effectively applied to study human groups, community life, and social interactions. Symbolic interactionism is able to reveal the relationships that occur naturally among members of the society, particularly the relationship between intangible symbols, rules, norms, and daily activities, with tangible things such as the formation of space, buildings, circulation, and other physical configurations.