Ivans Januardy
Universitas Palangka Raya

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

CRIMINAL LAW REVIEW OF INVESTMENT MANAGERS WHO IMPLEMENT PYRAMID SCHEMES Yacob F. Martono; Rizki Setyobowo Sangalang; Ivans Januardy; Restu Ronggo Wicaksono
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Tambun Bungai Vol 8 No 1 (2023): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Tambun Bungai Palangka Raya
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Tambun Bungai Palangka Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61394/jihtb.v8i1.241

Abstract

Indonesian people's interest in investment is increasing, this is in line with current technological advances. The number of capital market investors in mid-October 2021 grew by around 68 percent from the end of 2020 which reached 3.88 million people. With advances in technology and the rapid flow of information in cyberspace, many people only think about the benefits to be gained from an investment and have no knowledge or lack of understanding about investments and their risks. This is proven by the large number of people who are victims of an illegal investment that implements schemes, for example in the investment case of capital injection (sunmod) for medical devices, the number of victims is estimated to reach 3,000 people with a loss of Rp. 1.2 Trillion. The schematic diagram is also interpreted as a fake investment system that pays old participants from the money of the new participants they recruit, not from real profits. This scheme is aimed at collapsing, because the revenue if any, will hurt the participants. The illegality of the scheme lies in the incurring of losses at a rate below the loss of the amount of money invested in the business. Investment business activities that apply schemes can be held criminally accountable for violating Law Number 7 of 2014 concerning Explanation of Trade Article 9. Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection Article 8 paragraph (1) letters a, d, e, f, Article 9 paragraph (1) letters c, e, j, k, Article 10, Article 13 paragraph 1, Article 15, and Article 17 paragraph (1) letters a, b, c, d. Regulation of the Minister of Trade Number 70 of 2019 concerning the Direct Distribution of Goods Article 21 letter k, Law Number 21 of 2008, Article 59. Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 10 of 1998 concerning Amendments to Law Number 7 of 1992 concerning Banking Article 46. ​​​​Law Number 8 of 1995 concerning Capital Markets Article 103. Article 378 of the Criminal Code concerning fraud.
Penundaan Eksekusi: Tinjauan Yuridis Kekuasaan Kehakiman Ivans Januardy
Palangka Law Review VOLUME 1 ISSUE 2, SEPTEMBER 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Palangka Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52850/palarev.v1i2.4048

Abstract

Pelaksanaan putusan pengadilan yang telah berkekuatan hukum tetap dan dapat dilakukan secara paksa, menunjukkan bahwa pihak yang tereksekusi berada dalam kondisi “keberatan” atas eksekusi yang diberlakukan terhadapnya. Keberatan tersebut adakalanya dinyatakan dalam bentuk tindakan perlawanan, yang diarahkan agar eksekusi dapat ditunda. Masalah yang diteliti, Pertama, Pasal 54 ayat (3) Undang-undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang kekuasaan Kehakiman bersifat fungsional dengan hal penundaan eksekus?, kedua, Alasan-alasan yang menjadi pertimbangan dapat ditundanya suatu eksekusi/pelaksanaan putusan hakim yang telah mempunyai kekuatan hukum tetap? Penelitian ini merupakan penilitian normatif yang mendasarkan pada bahan hukum primer dan sekunder, yang berupa peraturan perundang-undangan dan literatur-literatur yang relevan dengan objek penelitian. Bahan hukum primer dan sekunder diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan. Analisis yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah diskriptif kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa berdasarkan ketentuan Pasal 53 ayat (3) Undang-undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman, yang berbunyi, “putusan pengadilan dilaksanakan dengan memperhatikan nilai kemanusiaan dan keadilan”, sesungguhnya merupakan suatu celah yang dimanfaatkan oleh si tereksekusi untuk mengajukan permohonan penundaan eksekusi.
Pernikahan Tanpa Izin di Lingkungan Militer: Analisis Yuridis Pertimbangan Hakim pada Kasus Pidana Militer Nomor 143 K/MIL/2016 Nuraliah Ali; ivans januardy; Thea Farina; Yessiarie Silvany Sibot; Satriya Nugraha
Palangka Law Review Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): VOLUME 4, ISSUE 1, MARET 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Palangka Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52850/palarev.v4i1.13634

Abstract

Marriage without permission in the military environment is a serious violation that can disrupt discipline, operational efficiency, and the morale of soldiers. This study aims to analyze Indonesian military law concerning unauthorized marriages, focusing on Military Criminal Case Number 143 K/MIL/2016 involving a TNI AL soldier. The research examines unauthorized marriages within the military context. It employs a descriptive-analytical approach by analyzing Indonesian military law regarding marriage permissions and a concrete case of unauthorized marriage by a TNI AL soldier. The results indicate that in this case, the defendant, who married without permission, was charged with violating Article 279, Paragraph (1) of the Indonesian Criminal Code. Although a 7-month imprisonment sentence was imposed, this decision raises questions about the appropriateness and effectiveness of the sanctions in preventing unauthorized marriages. The study's implications highlight the need for broader regulations governing marriage permissions in the military to more effectively address this issue. The research concludes that unauthorized marriages remain a significant issue that needs to be addressed seriously within the military environment.